Safety and Efficacy Study of TG-873870 (Nemonoxacin) in Diabetic Foot Infections

December 25, 2014 updated by: TaiGen Biotechnology Co., Ltd.

An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multi-Center Study of TG-873870 for Treating Patients With Diabetic Foot Infections of Mild to Moderate Severity Associated With Gram-Positive Pathogens

Safety and Efficacy Study of TG-873870 (Nemonoxacin) in Diabetic Foot Infections

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study will assess the safety and efficacy of TG-873870 (Nemonoxacin) in patients with Diabetic Foot Infections. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) assessment will be conducted in a subgroup of eight consenting patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gauteng
      • East Lynne, Gauteng, South Africa
        • Eastmed Academic Clinical Trial Center
      • Hammanskraal, Gauteng, South Africa
        • Jubilee Clinical Trial Center
      • Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa
        • Montana Hospital
      • Witbank, Gauteng, South Africa
        • Park Medical Center
    • Port Elizabeth
      • Korsten, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
        • Mercantile Clinical Trial Center
      • Kaoshiung, Taiwan
        • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital- Kaoshiung, Taiwan
      • Taichung, Taiwan
        • Cheng Ching Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
      • Tainan, Taiwan
        • Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Wan Fang Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Cardinal Tien Hospital (CTH), Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
      • Tao Yuan, Taiwan
        • Cheng-Gung Memorial Hospital - LinKou, Taiwan
      • Khon Kaen, Thailand
        • Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University
    • California
      • Montebello, California, United States, 90640
        • Healthcare Partners
      • Pasadena, California, United States, 91105
        • Healthcare Partners
    • Iowa
      • Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50314
        • The Amputation Prevention Center at Broadlawns Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Body weight ≥ 40 kg
  • Previously known or newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus, including type 1 and type 2 (per the American Diabetes Association guidelines), which is controlled by proper lifestyle (diet, exercise) or treatment with either oral medications or insulin
  • Patients' HbA1c ≦ 12% at screening
  • Clinically defined diabetic foot infection of mild or moderate severity (PEDIS grade 2-3) as based on the guideline of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. It includes any inframalleolar infection of the soft-tissue, such as paronychia, cellulitis, myositis, abscesses, and tendonitis
  • Evidence of necrotic tissue, purulent collections or abscess that may require excision, incision or drainage (based on investigator's judgment, and a surgeon if needed)
  • Must be able to provide suitable tissue specimens (preferably obtained by biopsy or tissue curettage, or purulent fluid aspiration, rather than by swabbing) from the infected wound (after appropriate cleansing and debridement) for Gram-staining and bacterial cultures (aerobes and anaerobes)
  • A confirmed Gram-positive pathogen infection by Gram-stain. The criterion to determine patient's eligibility for study recruitment is a Gram-stained smear with at least 1 Gram-positive organism seen in at least two high power fields. A solely Gram-positive pathogen infection or a polymicrobial infection including Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens are acceptable within the framework of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A co-morbid disease condition that could compromise evaluation or participation in this study, such as severe hepatic disease (e.g., active hepatitis, decompensated liver cirrhosis), renal failure (estimated creatinine clearance [CrCl] <30 ml/minute or need for hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis), or active systemic malignancy (advanced or metastatic), unless enrollment is deemed appropriate at the discretion of the Investigator with prior consultation with the study Medical Monitor
  • History of prolonged QTc interval or a medical condition requiring the use of a concomitant medication that is associated with an increased QTc interval (e.g., class I or class III anti-arrhythmic agents)
  • Contact dermatitis over the infected skin area, infected third-degree burn wounds, necrotizing fascitis, extensive gangrene, pyoderma gangrenosum, deep vein thrombosis, shock, or any medical disorder that could either interfere with the evaluation of treatment or the response of the patient to therapy
  • Radiological evidence of bone or joints infection within 7 days prior to or at screening, i.e. potential osteomyelitis or septic arthritis
  • Clinically defined uninfected or severe infection (PEDIS grade 1 or 4) as based on the Infectious Diseases Society of America classification system
  • Any known severe immunosuppressive condition, such as an active hematological malignancy, HIV infection or active treatment with any immunosuppressive drug (including corticosteroids at a dose of >20 mg/day of prednisone, or its equivalent)
  • Has received or will be receiving chemotherapy or oncolytics within six months prior to entering or during the study
  • History of current or active alcohol abuse (>3 drinks daily or binge drinking) or any illicit drug use
  • Known or suspected critical ischemia of the affected limb (based on investigators' clinical judgments and vascular assessment)
  • Wound that contains or is proximate to any prosthetic materials or devices that is/are not scheduled for removal
  • Patient with a foot infection that, in the investigator's judgment, is severe enough to require hospitalization or intravenous antibiotic therapy
  • Neutrophil count <1000 cells/mm3

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Nemonoxacin
Nemonoxacin 750 mg,oral administration, single-arm, once daily 7±1 and 14±1 days.
750 mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Success (in ITT Population)
Time Frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination

Clinical Success

  • Resolution is defined as total resolution of all pretreatment clinically significant signs and symptoms of infection and no development of any systemic evidence of infection.
  • Improvement is defined as resolution of more than two, but not all, pretreatment clinical signs and symptoms, or partial resolution of all clinical signs and symptoms relative to the baseline assessment, with no further need for antibiotic therapy, and no need for infection-related surgical interventions.
Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microbiological Success Rate
Time Frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination

Microbiological Success

  • Eradicated, defined as absence of the original pathogen(s) from a repeat culture of the original infection site performed at the TOC visit.
  • Presumed Eradicated, defined as meeting the definition for Clinical Success at the TOC visit, but tissue sample could be obtained for culture from the original infection site.

    • TOC=Test of Cure
Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
Clinical Success (in PP Population)
Time Frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination

Clinical Success

  • Resolution is defined as total resolution of all pretreatment clinically significant signs and symptoms of infection and no development of any systemic evidence of infection.
  • Improvement is defined as resolution of more than two, but not all, pretreatment clinical signs and symptoms, or partial resolution of all clinical signs and symptoms relative to the baseline assessment, with no further need for antibiotic therapy, and no need for infection-related surgical interventions.
Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
Clinical Success (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)
Time Frame: End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)

Clinical Success

  • Resolution is defined as total resolution of all pretreatment clinically significant signs and symptoms of infection and no development of any systemic evidence of infection.
  • Improvement is defined as resolution of more than two, but not all, pretreatment clinical signs and symptoms, or partial resolution of all clinical signs and symptoms relative to the baseline assessment, with no further need for antibiotic therapy, and no need for infection-related surgical interventions.
End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)
Per-Pathogen Clinical Responses (at Test of Cure)
Time Frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
Clinical responses were assessed on a per-pathogen basis for the most frequently isolated pathogens at baseline (i.e., present in four or more patients), including MRSA. Clinical Responses were assessed at Test of Cure visit within each of the ITT and PP populations. Insufficient numbers prevented reporting Clinical Success rates for Streptococcus pyogenes in the PP population.
Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
Per-Pathogen Clinical Response (at End of Treatment/Early Termination)
Time Frame: End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)
Clinical responses were assessed on a per-pathogen basis for the most frequently isolated pathogens at baseline (i.e., present in four or more patients), including MRSA. Clinical Responses were assessed at at End of Treatment/Early Termination within each of the ITT and PP populations. Insufficient numbers prevented reporting Clinical Success rates for Streptococcus pyogenes in the PP population.
End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)
Per-Pathogen Microbiological Responses
Time Frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
Microbiological responses were assessed on a per-pathogen basis for the most frequently isolated pathogens at baseline (i.e., present in four or more patients), including MRSA. Microbiological Responses were assessed at Test of Cure visit within each of the ITT and PP populations. Insufficient numbers prevented reporting Microbiological Success rates for Streptococcus pyogenes in the PP population.
Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
Total Wound Score (at Test of Cure in ITT Population)
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Baseline); Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
The Diabetic Foot Infection (DFI) Wound Scores will be used to evaluate the wound assessment at baseline and Test of Cure visits. The wound composite score was based on combining the general wound parameters (signs and symptoms of infection), and wound measurements (length, width, depth). Each wound parameter was assigned a score based on severity, with higher scores defining greater severity. For wound measurements and undermining, larger measurements received higher scores. The minimum and maximum score are 3 and 49, respectively.
Visit 1 (Baseline); Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
Total Wound Score (at Test of Cure in PP Population)
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Baseline); Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
The Diabetic Foot Infection (DFI) Wound Scores will be used to evaluate the wound assessment at baseline and Test of Cure visits. The wound composite score was based on combining the general wound parameters (signs and symptoms of infection), and wound measurements (length, width, depth). Each wound parameter was assigned a score based on severity, with higher scores defining greater severity. For wound measurements and undermining, larger measurements received higher scores. The minimum and maximum score are 3 and 49, respectively.
Visit 1 (Baseline); Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
Total Wound Score (at End of Treatment/ Early Termination in ITT Population)
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Baseline); End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)
The Diabetic Foot Infection (DFI) Wound Scores will be used to evaluate the wound assessment at baseline and End of Treatment/ Early Termination visits. The wound composite score was based on combining the general wound parameters (signs and symptoms of infection), and wound measurements (length, width, depth). Each wound parameter was assigned a score based on severity, with higher scores defining greater severity. For wound measurements and undermining, larger measurements received higher scores. The minimum and maximum score are 3 and 49, respectively.
Visit 1 (Baseline); End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)
Total Wound Score (at End of Treatment/ Early Termination in PP Population)
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Baseline); End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)
The Diabetic Foot Infection (DFI) Wound Scores will be used to evaluate the wound assessment at baseline and Test of Cure visits. The wound composite score was based on combining the general wound parameters (signs and symptoms of infection), and wound measurements (length, width, depth). Each wound parameter was assigned a score based on severity, with higher scores defining greater severity. For wound measurements and undermining, larger measurements received higher scores. The minimum and maximum score are 3 and 49, respectively.
Visit 1 (Baseline); End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)
Diabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in ITT Population
Time Frame: End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)
The number of patients within each of the PEDIS grading categories (uninfected, mild, moderate and severe) at baseline and End of Treatment/Early Termination.
End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)
Diabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in ITT Population
Time Frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
The number of patients within each of the PEDIS grading categories (uninfected, mild, moderate and severe) at baseline and Test of Cure.
Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
Diabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at End of Treatment/Early Termination in PP Population
Time Frame: End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)
The number of patients within each of the PEDIS grading categories (uninfected, mild, moderate and severe) at baseline and End of Treatment/Early Termination.
End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)
Diabetic Foot Assessment (PEDIS) Shifts From Baseline at Test of Cure in PP Population
Time Frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
The number of patients within each of the PEDIS grading categories (uninfected, mild, moderate and severe) at baseline and Test of Cure.
Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
Need for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in ITT Population)
Time Frame: End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)
Results in relation to the need for surgery, hospitalization, new and/or additional non-study antibiotic therapy for failure of initial oral therapy at End of Treatment/Early Termination.
End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)
Need for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in ITT Population)
Time Frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
Results in relation to the need for surgery, hospitalization, new and/or additional non-study antibiotic therapy for failure of initial oral therapy at Test of Cure.
Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
Need for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in PP Population)
Time Frame: End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)
Results in relation to the need for surgery, hospitalization, new and/or additional non-study antibiotic therapy for failure of initial oral therapy at End of Treatment/Early Termination.
End of Treatment/Early Termination Visit; 7±1, 14±1, 21±1 or 28±1 days after Baseline (Day 1)
Need for Surgery, Hospitalisation and Non-Study Antibiotic Therapy for Diabetic Foot Infection During Study (in PP Population)
Time Frame: Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination
Results in relation to the need for surgery, hospitalization, new and/or additional non-study antibiotic therapy for failure of initial oral therapy at Test of Cure.
Test of Cure Visit, 12±2 days after End of Treatment Visit/Early Termination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Kuang-Chung Shih, M.D., Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Principal Investigator: Jawl-Shan Hwang, M.D., Cheng-Gung Memorial Hospital - LinKou, Taiwan
  • Principal Investigator: Te-Lin Hsia, M.D., Cardinal Tien Hospital (CTH), Taiwan
  • Principal Investigator: Jung-Fu Chen, M.D., Chang Gung Memorial Hospital- Kaoshiung, Taiwan
  • Principal Investigator: Chien-Wen Chou, M.D., Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
  • Principal Investigator: Che-Han Hsu, M.D., Cheng Ching Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
  • Principal Investigator: Joseph De Santo, M.D., HealthCare Partners, Pasadena, USA
  • Principal Investigator: Lee Rogers, M.D., The Amputation Prevention Center at Broadlawns Medical Center, Des Moines, USA
  • Principal Investigator: Kwei Quartey, M.D., HealthCare Partners, Montebello, USA
  • Principal Investigator: Lynn Tudhope, M.D., Montana Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
  • Principal Investigator: Andre Tudhope, M.D., Jubilee Clinical Trial Center, Hammanskraal, South Africa
  • Principal Investigator: Mohammed Fulat, M.D., Eastmed Academic Clinical Trial Center, East Lynne, South Africa
  • Principal Investigator: Dirkie van Rensburg, M.D., Park Medical Center, Witbank, South Africa
  • Principal Investigator: Mashra Gani, M.D., Mercantile Clinical Trial Center, Korsten, South Africa
  • Principal Investigator: Piroon Mootsitkapun, M.D., Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand
  • Principal Investigator: Chieh-Feng Chen, M.D., Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

May 28, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 9, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 25, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Foot Infections

Clinical Trials on TG-873870 (Nemonoxacin)

3
Subscribe