- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00733135
Study of the SilverHawk™ /TurboHawk™ Plaque Excision Systems Used With SpiderFX to Treat Calcified Peripheral Arterial Disease (DEFINITIVE Ca++)
August 14, 2015 updated by: Medtronic Endovascular
Determination of Safety and Effectiveness of the SilverHawk™ Peripheral Plaque Excision System for Calcium (SilverHawk LS-C) and the SpiderFX™ Embolic Protection Device for the Treatment of Calcified Peripheral Arterial Disease in the Superficial Femoral and/or the Popliteal Arteries (DEFINITIVE Ca++)
This is a multi-center, non-randomized, single arm study of the SilverHawk™ /TurboHawk™ plaque excision systems when used in conjunction with SpiderFX™ embolic protection device in treatment of moderate to severely calcified peripheral arterial disease in the superficial femoral and/or popliteal arteries.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
133
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Provides written informed consent
- Willing to comply with follow-up evaluations at specified times
- Has leg pain due to peripheral arterial disease
- Disease located within the femoropopliteal artery
- Moderate to severe calcification
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previously implanted stent(s) or stent graft(s) in target leg
- Life expectancy less than 12 months
- Has any planned surgical or endovascular intervention of target vessel 30 days before or after index procedure
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
OTHER: Atherectomy with embolic protection
All subjects were treated with atherectomy (with SilverHawk or TurboHawk device) in conjunction with embolic protection (SpiderFX device).
|
Catheter-based excision of moderate to severely calcified plaque located in the SFA and/or popliteal artery.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Successful Revascularization
Time Frame: at the end of the procedure
|
Less than or equal to 50% residual diameter stenosis following plaque excision remaining at the target lesion(s), as adjudicated by the angiographic core laboratory
|
at the end of the procedure
|
Major Adverse Event Free Rate 30 Days
Time Frame: 30 Days
|
MAE was defined as a serious adverse event that results in death, acute myocardial infarction, dissection (grade C or greater), clinical perforation, pseudo-aneurysm, thrombosis, distal embolism (clinically relevant), amputation, or clinically-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), through 30 days post-procedure, as adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC).
|
30 Days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Technical Procedural Success
Time Frame: at the end of the procedure
|
Technical Procedural Success was defined as meeting all of the following requirements:
|
at the end of the procedure
|
Residual Diameter Stenosis
Time Frame: at the end of the procedure
|
This endpoint was met when there was less than 30% residual diameter stenosis following treatment with SilverHawk™ /TurboHawk™ plaque excision systems and any adjunctive therapy (if required), as adjudicated by the angiographic core laboratory.
|
at the end of the procedure
|
Presence of Debris in Deployed SpiderFx™ Embolic Protection Device
Time Frame: at the end of the procedure
|
Presence of debris in deployed SpiderFx™ embolic protection device
|
at the end of the procedure
|
Preservation of Run-off Distal to the Filter
Time Frame: at the end of the procedure
|
Preservation of run-off distal to SpiderFX™ distal embolic protection device was determined by angiography of run-off vessels at the end of the procedure, as adjudicated by the angiographic core laboratory.
|
at the end of the procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David Roberts, MD, Sutter Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
October 1, 2008
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
November 1, 2010
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
November 1, 2010
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 8, 2008
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 11, 2008
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
August 12, 2008
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
August 26, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 14, 2015
Last Verified
August 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- FHT-P-07-003
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Peripheral Arterial Disease
-
University of NebraskaNot yet recruitingPeripheral Arterial Disease | Peripheral Vascular Diseases | Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease | Peripheral Artery DiseaseUnited States
-
CID S.p.A.Meditrial Europe Ltd.Not yet recruitingPeripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease | Peripheral Artery DiseaseItaly
-
Marissa JarosinskiRecruitingPeripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease | Peripheral Vascular Disease | Peripheral Artery Disease | Clopidogrel, Poor Metabolism of | Artery DiseaseUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityTerminatedPAD - Peripheral Arterial Disease | PVD- Peripheral Vascular DiseaseUnited States
-
Vascuros Medical Pte LtdNovella ClinicalUnknownPeripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease | Peripheral Vascular Disease | Peripheral Artery DiseaseSingapore, Belgium, Germany
-
Western Vascular Institute, IrelandRecruitingPeripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseIreland
-
Jena University HospitalAngioDroid s.r.l., Bologna (Italy)CompletedPeripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseGermany
-
Seoul National University HospitalAstellas Pharma Korea, Inc.CompletedPeripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseKorea, Republic of
-
Heidelberg UniversityTerminatedPeripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseGermany
-
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University HospitalSuspendedPeripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseGermany
Clinical Trials on SilverHawk™ LS-C, TurboHawk™ LS-C, TurboHawk™ LX-C plaque excision systems and SpiderFX™ embolic protection device
-
Medtronic EndovascularCompletedCarotid Artery DiseaseUnited States