Fluid Lavage of Open Wounds (FLOW)

February 10, 2016 updated by: Prisma Health-Upstate

Fluid Lavage of Open Wounds (FLOW): A Multi-center, Blinded, Factorial Trial Comparing Alternative Irrigating Solutions and Pressures in Patients With Open Fractures

Open fracture wounds are a constant challenge to orthopaedic surgeons, with infections a common complication. There is currently little evidence as to which is the most effective way to wash out these wounds. This study is a multi-center, prospective, randomized study. The infection rates will be compared between irrigation using high pressure versus low pressure versus gravity flow, and also saline versus a soap solution as the irrigation solution. The results from this study will help to determine the best method of washing out open fractures wounds. In this study, all open wounds will be washed out using methods commonly used by orthopaedic surgeons

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2540

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Prahran, Australia, VIC 3181
        • The Alfred
      • Quebec, Canada
        • Hôpital de L'Enfant-Jésus
    • British Columbia
      • New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada, V3L 5P5
        • Royal Columbian Hospital-New Wesminster
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 1M9
        • Vancouver General Hospital
    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3A 1R9
        • Health Sciences Winnipeg
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 3A7
        • Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8L 2X2
        • Hamilton Health Sciences
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • McMaster University
      • London, Ontario, Canada
        • London Health Sciences
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1V 4E9
        • Ottawa Hospital- Civic
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5C 1R6
        • St. Michael's Hospital
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3G-1A4
        • McGill University Health Centre
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4J 1C5
        • Hospital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal
      • Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
        • Université de Sherbrooke
      • Prune, India
        • Sancheti Institute
      • Oslo, Norway
        • Ullevål University Hospital
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • Univeristy of Alabama at Birmingham
    • California
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • University of California-Irvine
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94110
        • University of California- San Francisco
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Wishard Health Services, Indiana University
    • Massachusetts
      • Burlington, Massachusetts, United States, 01805
        • Lahey Clinic
    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49503
        • Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55415
        • Hennepin County Medical Center
    • Missouri
      • Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65212
        • University of Missouri Health Care
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • St. Louis University
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University
    • Ohio
      • Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45409
        • Miami Valley Hospital/Wright State University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, United States
        • University of Pittsburg
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29605
        • Greenville Hospital System
    • Texas
      • Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States, 78234
        • Brooke Army Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 85 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men or women who are skeletally mature.
  2. Fracture of any extremity with complete radiographs.
  3. Open fractures (Gustilo-Anderson Types I-IIIB) (Table 2)*.
  4. Fracture requiring operative fixation.
  5. Provision of informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Open fractures with an associated vascular deficit (Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIC).
  2. Known allergy to detergents or castile soap ingredients.
  3. Previous wound infection or history of osteomyelitis in the injured extremity.
  4. Previous fracture with retained hardware in injured extremity that will interfere with new implant fixation.
  5. Surgical delay to operative wound management greater than 24 hours from hospital admission.
  6. Use of immunosuppressive medication within 6 months.
  7. Immunological deficient disease conditions (e.g. HIV).
  8. Fracture of the hand (metacarpals and phalanges).
  9. Fracture of the toes (phalanges).
  10. Likely problems, in the judgment of the investigators, with maintaining follow-up. We will, for example, exclude patients with no fixed address, those who report a plan to move out of town in the next year, or intellectually challenged patients without adequate family support.
  11. Previous randomization in this study or a competing study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Saline, gravity flow
Irrigation with Saline
Gravity flow irrigation will be standardized across participating centers as 3L bags of normal saline (alone or with soap solution) suspended 6-8 feet above floor level using an I.V. pole. Irrigation tubing (measuring 1/4 - 3/8 inch inner diameter) will be connected to the 3L bag and secured with a stopcock (or compressive device) until ready for use.
Active Comparator: Saline, Low Pressure
Irrigation with Saline

Irrigation with the Stryker SurgiLav System. At the low pressure setting delivers 5.9 p.s.i. pressure. The high-flow irrigator tip will be held perpendicular to and 5cm above the wound.

Irrigation with the Zimmer PulsaVac. For low pressure delivery, the shower tip will be used at the low pressure setting which delivers a pressure of 5.8 p.s.i.

Active Comparator: Saline, High Pressure
Irrigation with Saline

Irrigation with the Stryker SurgiLav System. For the high pressure delivery, the multi-orifice tip will be used at the high setting which delivers a pressure of 30 p.s.i.

Irrigation with the Zimmer PulsaVac System: For the high pressure delivery the shower tip will be used at the high pressure setting which delivers a pressure of 23 p.s.i.

Active Comparator: Soap, Gravity Flow
Gravity flow irrigation will be standardized across participating centers as 3L bags of normal saline (alone or with soap solution) suspended 6-8 feet above floor level using an I.V. pole. Irrigation tubing (measuring 1/4 - 3/8 inch inner diameter) will be connected to the 3L bag and secured with a stopcock (or compressive device) until ready for use.
Irrigation with Castile Soap Solution (80 ml per 3L bag of saline)
Active Comparator: Soap, low pressure

Irrigation with the Stryker SurgiLav System. At the low pressure setting delivers 5.9 p.s.i. pressure. The high-flow irrigator tip will be held perpendicular to and 5cm above the wound.

Irrigation with the Zimmer PulsaVac. For low pressure delivery, the shower tip will be used at the low pressure setting which delivers a pressure of 5.8 p.s.i.

Irrigation with Castile Soap Solution (80 ml per 3L bag of saline)
Active Comparator: Soap, high pressure

Irrigation with the Stryker SurgiLav System. For the high pressure delivery, the multi-orifice tip will be used at the high setting which delivers a pressure of 30 p.s.i.

Irrigation with the Zimmer PulsaVac System: For the high pressure delivery the shower tip will be used at the high pressure setting which delivers a pressure of 23 p.s.i.

Irrigation with Castile Soap Solution (80 ml per 3L bag of saline)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Re-operation within 12 months post initial surgery to treat an infection, manage a wound healing problem, or promote fracture healing.
Time Frame: within 12 months
within 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient function and quality of life measured by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) and the EuroQol-5D
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kyle J. Jeray, MD, Greenville Hospital System
  • Principal Investigator: Bradley Petrisor, MD, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
  • Principal Investigator: Gordan Guyatt, M.D., McMaster University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

November 10, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GHS-03-08-06
  • W81XWH-08-1-0473

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Open Fracture Wounds

Clinical Trials on Saline Solution

3
Subscribe