Gentamicin Open Tibia Study (GO-Tibia)

December 20, 2023 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

A Masked, Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Locally-applied Gentamicin Versus Saline in Open Tibia Fractures

Local application of antibiotics directly to the traumatic wound is a promising treatment for the prevention of infection after open tibia fractures, which are a significant source of disease burden globally, particularly in low-income countries. This study aims to measure the effect of locally applied gentamicin on risk of infection for open tibial fractures in Tanzania. If proven effective, local gentamicin would be a highly cost-effective strategy to reduce complications and disability from open tibial fractures that could impact care in both high- and low-income countries.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Tibial shaft (shinbone) fractures are the most common major fracture of the lower leg and are frequently associated with a break in the skin known as an open fracture. Because the bone is exposed by the open wound, open tibial fractures are often complicated by infection and failure of bone healing, which can lead to long-lasting disability and in some cases amputation. Intravenous antibiotics administered early after injury are a well-established measure to prevent fracture-related infection (FRI), but their effectiveness is limited by poor blood flow at the fracture site and inability to achieve high local concentrations with systemic administration. Gentamicin applied locally within the open fracture wound is a promising adjunctive measure to reduce the risk of FRI after these injuries, but there are no high-quality clinical trials evaluating its use.

This will be the first randomized trial evaluating locally administered gentamicin to reduce infection in a fracture population. If efficacious, local gentamicin is likely to be a highly cost-effective preventive strategy for FRI and may ultimately be cost saving. Although these findings will originate from a low-income country, results may be generalizable to populations in both high and low-income countries and could therefore significantly reduce the global burden of open fractures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

890

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
        • Recruiting
        • Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute
        • Contact:
          • Billy T Haonga, MD
          • Phone Number: 255-022-2151298
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Billy T Haonga, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age>18 years old
  • Open tibial shaft fracture meeting the following criteria:

    1. Orthopaed Trauma Association (OTA) Type 42
    2. Primarily closable wound
    3. Gustilo-Anderson (GA) Type I, II, or IIIA

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Time from injury to presentation > 48 hours
  • Time from injury to surgery > 7 days
  • Aminoglycoside allergy
  • GA IIIB or IIIC open fractures
  • Bilateral open tibial fractures
  • Severe brain (GCS<12) or spinal cord injury
  • Severe vascular injury
  • Severe burns (>10% Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) or >5% TBSA with full thickness or circumferential injury)
  • Pathologic fracture
  • History of active limb infection, ipsilaterally
  • Unlikely to complete follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Gentamicin
The intervention consists of 80mg of liquid gentamicin diluted in 5 mL normal saline (16mg/mL). The solution is injected by inserting a 22-gauge needle down to bone through an anteromedial approach at the level of the fracture site such that the injected solution fills the wound cavity. A total of 5mL of study solution will be administered.
Liquid gentamicin administered at the open fracture site
Placebo Comparator: Saline
The control consists of 5 mL normal saline injected immediately after wound closure at the open fracture site. The solution is injected by inserting a 22-gauge needle down to bone through an anteromedial approach at the level of the fracture site such that the injected solution fills the wound cavity. A total of 5mL of study solution will be administered.
Normal saline administered at the open fracture site

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of fracture-related infection (FRI)
Time Frame: 12 months

Fracture-related infection is a consensus definition of infection after fracture treatment. It is diagnosed by an orthopaedic surgeon based on any of the following four diagnostic criteria: (1) fistula, sinus or wound breakdown; (2) purulent drainage from the wound or presence of pus during surgery; (3) phenotypically indistinguishable pathogens identified by culture from at least two separate deep tissue/implant specimens; or (4) presence of microorganisms in deep tissue taken during an operative intervention, as seen on histopathological examination.

FRI diagnosis is likely to peak between 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery and has a non-normal time-to-event distribution, with incident cases rarely presenting later than 12 months after surgery. All events will be confirmed by an independent adjudication committee comprised of three masked, non-treating orthopaedic trauma surgeons.

12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of nonunion
Time Frame: 12 months

Binary outcome based on the following criteria:

  1. Any unplanned reoperation for promotion of bone healing; OR
  2. Modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia Fractures (mRUST) ≤10 at 12 months follow-up AND either: Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT) score ≤11 at 12 month follow-up, OR recommendation by treating surgeon for nonunion repair surgery
12 months
Occurrence of unplanned fracture-related reoperation
Time Frame: 12 months

Occurrence of unplanned fracture-related reoperation, a binary variable, for infection, wound healing, or fracture union, excluding removal of implants for prominence/irritation. This may include but is not limited to:

  1. Irrigation and debridement of surgical incisions or open fracture wounds due to infections or wound healing problems;
  2. Revision wound closure for dehiscence;
  3. Soft tissue coverage procedure for infected or necrotic wound;
  4. Fracture delayed union or nonunion surgery (such as bone grafting or implant exchange);
  5. Reoperation for hardware or prosthesis failure due to infection or bone-healing problems;
  6. Amputation for infection, wound or fracture healing problem.
12 months
Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) as measured by EQ-5D-3L (Swahili version)
Time Frame: 12 months
The EQ-5D is a survey instrument that assesses multiple domains of quality-of-life, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
12 months
Fracture healing by modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial fractures (mRUST score)
Time Frame: 12 months
The mRUST score is based on evaluation plain radiographs of the fracture site. Each cortex is scored from 1-4 based on the degree of healing and summed resulting in an ordinal scale ranging from 4 to 16, with higher score indicating greater fracture healing.
12 months
Clinical fracture healing by Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT)
Time Frame: 12 months
The FIX-IT score is an ordinal scale from 0-12 that encompasses two domains: ability to weight-bear and pain at fracture site, each scored from 0-6. Higher score indicates more clinical healing.
12 months
Occurence of FRI Suggestive Criteria
Time Frame: 12 months
Suggestive criteria are signs/symptoms of infection that do not meet criteria for definitive fracture-related infection (FRI). These include clinical signs (wound redness, fever) and radiographic signs (sequestrum), elevated serum inflammatory markers, and new onset or increased non-purulent wound drainage.
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: 12 months
All serious and non-serious adverse events will be reported as counts for each treatment group
12 months
Fold-change in creatinine level
Time Frame: 2 days
Creatinine is a laboratory value used to assess kidney function. Creatinine levels will be measured preoperatively and 2-days postoperatively for all study participants.
2 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David W Shearer, MD, MPH, University of California, San Francisco
  • Principal Investigator: Billy T Haonga, MD, Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fracture Open Tibia

Clinical Trials on Gentamicin

3
Subscribe