Safety Study of Using Symlin Alongside Insulin in a Multiple Injection Port

September 28, 2020 updated by: Thomas C. Blevins, M.D., Texas Diabetes & Endocrinology, P.A.

A Randomized, Parallel, Single Center, Comparison, Pilot Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Using Symlin Alongside Insulin in a Multiple Injection Port (I-PORT)

The purpose of this study is to determine whether injecting Symlin and insulin through a multiple injection port is safe and effective. This will be measured by HbA1c values taken at the beginning of the study and at the final visit.

The secondary objective of the study is to measure patient satisfaction toward using the multiple injection port.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this clinical study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of giving pramlintide and insulin in the same multi-port injection device (I-PORT™). Efficacy was measured by HbA1c values taken at baseline and the final visit

The secondary objective of this study is to measure patient satisfaction, opinions and attitudes toward using the I-PORT™ for insulin and pramlintide administration compared to standard insulin and pramlintide injections. The secondary safety and efficacy evaluations included weight, Glycomark, 7-point SMBG evaluations, CGMS evaluations, incidence of glucose values > 300 mg/dl, incidence of glucose values < 70 mg/dl, and insulin dose before the study period, at month 1, 2 and 3.

The primary patient satisfaction evaluations included Quality of Life Questionnaire and treatment satisfaction questionnaires.

The I-PORT™ is a disposable, low profile injection port through which insulin is injected subcutaneously from a standard syringe or insulin pen.(Figure 1) The I-PORT™ allows multiple insulin injections for up to 72 hours. Once the device is applied, the insertion needle is removed and the cannula remains underneath the skin, serving as a delivery channel into the SQ tissue- one skin puncture every three days. To use the device, the subject places the needle on an injection device, such as a syringe or insulin pen, through the re-sealable septum at the top of the I-PORT™ and injects medication directly into the delivery channel.

Study participants included male and females ages 18 and older who were utilizing a regimen of at least two injections daily of rapid acting insulin and at least two injections daily of pramlintide (Symlin®) with an HbA1c between >6.5 and < 9.0%.

There were 39 patients screened for the study and 8 screen failures leaving 31 subjects ages 18 and older, diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus for a minimum of six months. 1 patient dropped out of the study due to an AE and 30 completed the study.

A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel, Single Center, Comparison Study. Approximately 13 patients with type 1 diabetes and 18 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized into one of two treatment groups. The randomization was stratified within diabetes type (1 vs. 2) and low (6.5-7.5) vs. high (7.6-9.0) HbA1c level. The randomization process was executed using a computer generated randomization table.

Subject Groups:

  • Group 1- Study subjects administered insulin and pramlintide using standard injection therapy during the entire duration of the trial
  • Group 2- Study subjects administered insulin and pramlintide via a single I-PORT™ for the entire duration of the trial

This study consisted of 8 visits: Screening/Visit 1, Visit 1a (Day -3), Visit 2 (Baseline/Day 0), Visit 3(Day 14), Visit 4(Month 1), Visit 5(Month 2), Visit 5a (Day 81) Visit 6(Month 3).

Subjects participating in this protocol were asked to take their rapid acting insulin preparations and Pramlintide (Symlin®) at the same time using the dose called for by their prescribed regimen established prior to study entry. Subjects used their usual type of insulin preparations obtained by prescription from the commercial pharmacy system. Subjects randomized into Group 2 were given guided instruction on the proper technique of insertion, use and removal of the I-PORT™.

I-PORT™ devices were provided to the subjects and dispensed throughout the trial. Pramlintide (Symlin) was supplied by Amylin Pharmaceuticals.

Patients performed a 7 point SMBG test 3-5 days at baseline and all subjects were instructed on use of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (Medtronic iPro). The sensor was inserted for 3-day wear at baseline and blood samples for HbA1c and Glycomark testing were obtained. All subjects completed treatment satisfaction and QoL questionnaires. Each subject was randomized to one of two possible treatment groups.

At each visit, subject diaries were reviewed, weight measurement and a site insertion exam were performed. AEs and concomitant medications were reviewed at each visit.

Patients were asked to do a 7 point SMBG test 3-5 days prior to visit 3,4,5, and 5a. At visit 5a subjects were again instructed on use of a CGMS and a sensor was inserted for 3-day wear.

At the final visit (visit 6), the CGMS was removed and treatment satisfaction and QoL questionnaires were completed by all subjects, and blood samples were taken for HbA1c and Glycomark testing.

Patients were instructed to contact the site if they had 2 glucoses in a row > 300 mg/dl or 2 glucoses in a row of <70 mg/dl. Insulin and/or Pramlintide (Symlin®) were adjusted by PI as needed throughout the trial. Discontinuation of I-PORT™ use was at the discretion of the PI as a rescue measure.

The following QoL questionnaires/ Treatment satisfaction questionnaires were obtained from patients at screening and at the final visit: DSTQ, DSTQ-c, DDS, TSQ,I-PORT™ Device Benefits, Insulin/Symlin Satisfaction Questionnaire, I-PORT™ Device Management, General Diabetes Management, I-PORT™ Device Satisfaction

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

31

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
        • Texas Diabetes & Endocrinology, PA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male or female ages 18 and up
  • utilizing a regimen of at least two injections daily of insulin and at least two injections daily of Symlin
  • able to understand and sign an informed consent form and HIPPA form
  • agrees to all study visits and procedures
  • HbA1c between >6.5 and <9.0 (inclusive)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history or current diagnosis of chronic disease which in the view of the PI would interfere with adequate involvement in and completion of the requirements of the study
  • history of malignancy with in the last five years of study entry (other than basal cell carcinoma)
  • current use of any drugs that alter gastrointestinal motility (e.g., anticholinergic agents such as atropine), agents that slow intestinal absorption of nutrients (e.g. a-glucosidase inhibitors) or promotility agents (e.g. metaclopromide)
  • any contraindication of Symlin or I-PORT according to the package labeling
  • are female and pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant during the duration of the trial
  • are poorly compliant with their current insulin and/or Symlin regimen, as defined by their HCP
  • has history of known hypersensitivity to plastics or polymers
  • treatment with any investigational drug within one month prior to enrollment
  • myocardial infarction or stroke within six months prior to screening
  • initiated use of Symlin pen or any Insulin pen in lieu of a vial in last 4 weeks (pen use is okay as long as they have been using it for at least 4 weeks prior to screening visit)
  • female subjects of childbearing potential practicing inadequate birth control (adequate birth control is defined as using oral contraceptives, double barrier methods, Intrauterine devices, surgical sterilization or vasectomized partner)
  • have confirmed diagnosis of gastroparesis
  • have hypoglycemia unawareness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: I-PORT
Treatment group
The study will compare injecting Symlin and insulin into a multiple injection port (I-PORT) vs. standard injections.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: standard injections
control group
The study will compare injecting Symlin and insulin into a multiple injection port (I-PORT) vs. standard injections.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The Primary Outcome Will be Measured by HbA1c Values Taken at Screening, Baseline and After Three Months.
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Secondary Outcome Will Measure Patient Satisfaction, Opinions and Attitudes Toward Using the Multiple Injection Port for Insulin and Symlin Administration Compared to Standard Symlin Injections (Measured Through Using Questionnaires).
Time Frame: 3 months

Scores from the QOL and treatment satisfaction measures collected at Visit 1 and Visit 6.

To determine if patient satisfaction and patient opinions and attitudes toward using the I-PORT™ for insulin and Symlin® administration compared to standard insulin and Symlin® injections was significantly different for patients in the treatment and control groups, repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) was conducted on scores from the quality of life and treatment satisfaction measures collected at Visit 1 and Visit 6. The RM-ANOVA results were evaluated to determine if any statistically significant changes occurred. TSQ- lower numbers show less satisfied. DDS- Lower numbers show decrease in distress. DTSQ- Lower numbers show less satisfied. One patient did not complete Visit 6 questionnaires.

Scale ranges:

DDS scale range: 17- 102 DTSQc scale range: 16- 96 Insulin /Symlin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scale range: 15-90

3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas C. Blevins, MD, Texas Diabetes & Endocrinology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 13, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 1 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on I-PORT

3
Subscribe