Longitudinal Evaluation of Women Undergoing Pelvic Surgery for the Treatment of Gynecologic Cancer

March 11, 2024 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Longitudinal Evaluation of Women Undergoing Pelvic Exenteration for Treatment of Gynecologic Malignancy

The study investigates whether certain characteristics of gynecological cancer can help researchers predict how well a patient recovers from surgery to remove the lower colon, rectum, and bladder, and create openings through which urine and stool are passed out of the body (pelvic exenteration). Comparing the types of surgery completed and procedures used may help researchers to determine which are most effective and safe in patients with a history of gynecologic cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the types of complications experienced by women who undergo pelvic exenteration at University of Texas (UT) MD Anderson Cancer Center.

II. To determine whether the number of complications experienced by women who undergo pelvic exenteration at UT MD Anderson Cancer Center differ by vaginal and bladder reconstruction types.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate pathologic predictors of recurrence including histology, size of tumor, and distance of closest margin.

II. To longitudinally assess quality of life, sexual functioning, and symptoms in women who have undergone pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies.

III. To assess the impact of certain preoperative factors (albumin, electrolyte levels, body mass index) on the occurrence of post-operative complications.

IV. To determine if preoperative positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) correlates with pathologic findings at the time of surgery.

V. To calculate time to recurrence, overall survival, and disease-free survival of patients who undergo pelvic exenteration and correlate to key demographic, clinical, and pathologic factors.

OUTLINE:

RETROSPECTIVE PORTION: Patients who have undergone pelvic exenteration complete one set of quality of life (QOL) questionnaires.

PROSPECTIVE PORTION: Patients undergoing pelvic exenteration complete questionnaires over 20-40 minutes within 2 weeks before surgery, and at 4-12 weeks, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years after surgery regarding feelings, abilities, depression, coping, social support, sexual function and body image. Patients with cervical cancer may complete 1 additional questionnaire during each of these visits.

Patients who undergo surgery are followed up every 3 months for the first 2 years, and then every 6 months for 3 years.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

79

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women with a history of gynecologic malignancy who have undergone or are being offered a pelvic exenteration

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women with a history of gynecologic malignancy, including cervical, endometrial, vulvar, or vaginal carcinoma of any histology
  • Women who have undergone a pelvic exenteration after January 1993 or who are being offered a pelvic exenteration for treatment of their gynecologic malignancy
  • Patients must be suitable candidates for surgery (in case of prospective collection)
  • Patients who have signed an approved informed consent
  • Patients with a prior malignancy allowed if > 3 years previous with no current evidence of disease
  • Women must be able to read and write in either Spanish or English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with contraindications to surgery
  • Patients unwilling or unable to complete self-administered questionnaires
  • Patients who do not read or speak English or Spanish

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Observational (questionnaires)

RETROSPECTIVE PORTION: Patients who have undergone pelvic exenteration complete one set of QOL questionnaires.

PROSPECTIVE PORTION: Patients undergoing pelvic exenteration complete questionnaires over 20-40 minutes within 2 weeks before surgery, and at 4-12 weeks, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years after surgery regarding feelings, abilities, depression, coping, social support, sexual function and body image. Patients with cervical cancer may complete 1 additional questionnaire during each of these visits.

Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Complete questionnaires

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of surgical complications
Time Frame: 4 years
Will determine whether the number of surgical complications varies by vaginal and bladder reconstruction type.
4 years
Short-term and long-term complications
Time Frame: 4 years
Will calculate incidence with exact 95% confidence intervals, and will calculate summary statistics. Will create the statistics using both cohorts of patients together. Will also do this separately by cohort and by vaginal reconstruction type as well as by bladder reconstruction type. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be used to determine whether there is a difference in number of complications by vaginal reconstruction type and by bladder reconstruction type. This will be conducted separately for each cohort. Finally, will create a Poisson regression model using both cohorts of patients with terms for cohort, vaginal reconstruction type and bladder reconstruction type as well as certain preoperative factors (albumin, electrolyte levels, body mass index) that might be predictive of number of complications.
4 years
Quality of life
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Will summarize composite scores of the quality of life surveys by time from exenteration. This will be done separately for the retrospectively recruited patients and the prospectively recruited patients. Will also summarize information by year of surgery. To determine how quality of life changes over time, will create longitudinal models for each survey instrument given to the women. The two cohorts of women will initially be analyzed separately. A second model will be created using all patients that has terms for cohort, vaginal reconstruction type and bladder reconstruction type to determine whether these terms have an effect upon quality of life.
Up to 5 years
Recurrence
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Will calculate median time to recurrence in patients who undergo pelvic exenteration. Will use log-rank tests and construct proportional hazards models to evaluate pathologic predictors of recurrence such as histology, size of tumor, and distance of closest margin.
Up to 5 years
Overall survival
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Will calculate overall survival of patients who undergo pelvic exenteration. Will use log-rank tests and construct proportional hazards models to evaluate pathologic predictors of survival such as histology, size of tumor, and distance of closest margin.
Up to 5 years
Disease-free survival
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Will calculate disease-free survival of patients who undergo pelvic exenteration. Will use log-rank tests and construct proportional hazards models to evaluate pathologic predictors of survival such as histology, size of tumor, and distance of closest margin.
Up to 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pamela T Soliman, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 11, 2008

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2008

First Posted (Estimated)

November 14, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment

3
Subscribe