Well-being in Cancer Patients With Neuropathy During COVID-19 Who Participated in Prior Clinical Trials

April 17, 2024 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

COVID-19: Well-Being in Cancer Patients With Neuropathy Who Participated in Prior Clinical Trials

This study investigates the experiences of cancer patients with neuropathy during the COVID-19 pandemic to learn how the COVID-19 pandemic affects their quality of life and clinical outcomes. This study will also explore whether there are differences between patients who received neurofeedback (NFB, a type of therapy that is thought to help normalize brain activity) and those who did not. Learning about quality of life in cancer patients with neuropathy during the COVID-19 pandemic may help guide development of programs and policies to improve chronic pain patient care and outcomes during a major global healthcare crisis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Assess experiences during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic of the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (e.g. physical, emotional, social well-being), and other COVID-19-specific domains (e.g. anxiety, social interactions, finances), and the associations between COVID-19 experiences and COVID-19-specific distress, HRQOL and clinical outcomes of patients who participated in one of three clinical trials.

II. Examine differences in outcomes between neuropathic pain patients who participated in one of two trials of NFB and received NFB, and neuropathic pain patients who participated in a non-treatment-related neuropathy study (i.e., who did not receive NFB).

III. Evaluate the extent to which coping and resilience factors moderate the effects of COVID-19 experiences on COVID-19-specific distress, HRQOL and clinical outcomes.

OUTLINE:

Patients complete an online questionnaire over 15 minutes about their experiences regarding the COVID-19 pandemic including testing, risks of exposure, whether people they know have acquired COVID-19, as well as questions on how the pandemic has impacted their quality of life.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

274

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Cancer patients with neuropathy who have participated in one of the following clinical trials: 2015-0399, 2012-0642, or 2010-0675.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must have participated in one of the following protocols: 2015-0399, 2012-0642, or 2010-0675
  • Has an active email address or can be contacted by MyChart or personal email

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No evidence of consent from prior clinical trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Observational (questionnaire, quality of life)
Patients complete an online questionnaire over 15 minutes about their experiences regarding the COVID-19 pandemic including testing, risks of exposure, whether people they know have acquired COVID-19, as well as questions on how the pandemic has impacted their quality of life.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Complete questionnaire

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-related quality of life and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-specific domains of interest
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
We will use the COVID-19 Specific questionnaire. This scale will ask 15 questions that are organized into three sections: (a) Questions specific to the COVID-19 pandemic such as testing, serostatus, risk factors, loss of family or friends, isolation; (b) Thoughts, experiences and emotions regarding the COVID-19 pandemic; and (c) Health-related quality of life. This assessment was developed by Lorenzo Cohen (MD Anderson), in collaboration with investigators from the University of Miami and UCLA and is a comprehensive assessment of COVID-19 experiences.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
COVID-19 experiences and COVID-19 specific distress
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Will evaluate bivariate associations between COVID-19 experiences and COVID-19-specific distress, HRQOL and clinical outcomes, using Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients, chi-squared tests, or analyses of variance (ANOVA) where appropriate.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Differences in outcomes between neuropathic pain patients
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Will use linear regression (or generalized linear models, as applicable) to assess differences in the outcomes of interest between neuropathic pain patients who received neurofeedback (NFB) from either of the two NFB trials (principal investigator [PI]: Dr. Prinsloo) and the neuropathic pain patients who participated in Dr. Gibby-Reyes' trial (who, consequently, did not receive NFB).
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Coping and resilience factors
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Will preliminarily test the interaction effect between each of the coping and resilience factors and COVID-19 experiences on COVID-19-specific distress, HRQOL and clinical outcomes.
through study completion, an average of 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sarah Prinsloo, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 26, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

April 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-0508 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2020-06014 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment

3
Subscribe