Exercise Training in Asthma

Comparison of Two Types of Exercise Training for Asthmatic Subjects : Interests and Limits

The aim of the study is to compare two methods of exercise training: alternate load versus constant load realized at moderate or high intensities, in order to define the interests and the limits of each one of these two methods. The finality is to make possible to the expert to choose what exercise training induces the best results quickly and to make its choice according to the therapeutic objectives which it lays down.We also evaluate the effects of these exercises training on the vagal response and the bronchial tone of the asthmatics. From a clinical point of view, a close attention will be paid to the effects of these exercises training on the control of asthma and the quality of life of the subjects

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Strasbourg, France, 67 091
        • Service de Physiologie et d'Explorations Fonctionnelles - Pôle de Pathologie Thoracique - Nouvel Hôpital Civil
      • Strasbourg, France, 67091
        • Service de Pneumologie - Pôle de Pathologie Thoracique - Nouvel Hôpital Civil

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 to 45 years old
  • mild to moderate persistent asthma (GINA classification)
  • stabilized asthma
  • physical activity level between 5 and 11 (Baecke and coll, 1982)
  • no contra-indication for physical training

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cardiovascular pathology
  • metabolic pathology
  • traumatic pathology
  • BMI≥30
  • tobacco
  • diabetes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CA
Exercise training with alternate load
Comparison of two methods of exercise training: alternate load versus constant load realized at moderate or high intensities
Active Comparator: CC
Exercise training with constant load
Comparison of two methods of exercise training: alternate load versus constant load realized at moderate or high intensities

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max)
Time Frame: At T-1 = eight weeks before training - At T0 = beginning of training - At T1 = eight weeks after training
At T-1 = eight weeks before training - At T0 = beginning of training - At T1 = eight weeks after training
Maximal power output (Pmax)
Time Frame: At T-1 = eight weeks before training - At T0 = beginning of training - At T1 = eight weeks after training
At T-1 = eight weeks before training - At T0 = beginning of training - At T1 = eight weeks after training

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Exhaled NO (eNO)
Time Frame: At T-1 = eight weeks before training - At T0 = beginning of training - At T1 = eight weeks after training
At T-1 = eight weeks before training - At T0 = beginning of training - At T1 = eight weeks after training
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: At T-1 = eight weeks before training - At T0 = beginning of training - At T1 = eight weeks after training
At T-1 = eight weeks before training - At T0 = beginning of training - At T1 = eight weeks after training
Force Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1)
Time Frame: At T-1 = eight weeks before training - At T0 = beginning of training - At T1 = eight weeks after training
At T-1 = eight weeks before training - At T0 = beginning of training - At T1 = eight weeks after training

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Evelyne LONSDORFER, MD, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 21, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

January 12, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Exercise training

3
Subscribe