A Four-Arm Study Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Tramadol Once a Day 100, 200 and 300 mg Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee (With 7-Day Follow-up)

April 25, 2012 updated by: Labopharm Inc.
The objective of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of Tramadol Once a Day 100, 200, 300 mg and Placebo

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

552

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males or Females between the ages of 40-75 with a diagnosis of moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee, consistent with the ACR Clinical Classification Criteria for Arthritis of the Knee:

    • Current knee pain.
    • Less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness with or without crepitus on active motion.
    • Confirmation either by arthroscopy or radiologist's report (X-rays showing osteophytes, joint space narrowing or subchondral bone sclerosis {eburnation}) within five years prior to entry into the study.
  2. CRP < 8 ug/mL (if available at local lab) or ESR < 40 mm/hr.
  3. Total WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index) Pain Subscale Score of > 150 mm at Baseline corresponding with moderate to severe Osteoarthritis.
  4. Oral and written language comprehension at a level sufficient to comply with the protocol and complete study-related materials.
  5. REB approval of the written Informed Consent Form in Spanish or English which was signed and dated by the patient and Investigator, prior to study participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known rheumatoid arthritis or any other rheumatoid disease.
  2. Secondary arthritis i.e. any of the following: septic arthritis; inflammatory joint disease; gout; pseudogout; Paget's disease; joint fracture; acromegaly; fibromyalgia; Wilson's disease; ochronosis; haemochromatosis; osteochondromatosis; or collagen gene mutations.
  3. Evidence of effusion greater than 15 cc upon physical examination of the joint at Baseline (Visit 1).
  4. BMI greater than or equal to 38.
  5. Major illness, requiring hospitalization during the 3 months before commencement of the screening period.
  6. Unwillingness to stop taking pain medication (for arthritis or other types of pain) or was unwilling to stop taking other medications for the treatment of OA.
  7. Previous failure or discontinuation (due to adverse events) of tramadol HCl therapy.
  8. Treatment within the last 3 weeks with any of the following medications: monoamine oxidase inhibitors; tricyclic antidepressants and other tricyclic compounds (e.g. cyclobenzaprine, promethazine); neuroleptics; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; or any other drug that reduces seizure threshold.
  9. Treatment with another investigational agent within the last 30 days.
  10. A history of seizure disorder other than Infantile Febrile Seizures.
  11. Previous or current opioid dependency.
  12. Bowel disease causing malabsorption.
  13. Pregnancy or lactating or childbearing potential and unwilling to utilize a medically approved method of contraception during participation in this clinical trial.
  14. Significant liver disease, defined as active hepatitis or elevated liver enzymes >3 times the upper boundary of the normal range.
  15. Significant renal disease, defined as creatinine clearance <30 mL/min as estimated by the method of Levey et al., 1999.
  16. Current substance abuse or dependence, other than nicotine.
  17. Allergy or adverse reaction to tramadol or any structurally similar drugs e.g. opiates.
  18. Any other condition that, in the opinion of the Investigators, would have adversely affected the patient's ability to complete the study or its measures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mg
One Tramadol Once A Day tablet at randomized dose daily.
Experimental: 2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mg
One Tramadol Once A Day tablet at randomized dose daily.
Experimental: 3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mg
One Tramadol Once A Day tablet at randomized dose daily.
Placebo Comparator: 4: Placebo
One Placebo tablet daily.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
3-item Likert-scale: "How do you rate overall pain relief with the drug?" with 3 possible answers: "very effective", "effective", or "ineffective". The average of ratings at visits 2-5 was calculated as median, rounded up to the closest integer.
12 weeks
Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Percentage of difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Pain Subscale results from the sum of 5 of the questions.
12 weeks
Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Percentage of difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no difficulty (0mm) to extreme difficulty (100mm). The WOMAC Physical Function subscale results from the sum of 17 of the questions.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 3, week 6
Percentage of difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale score between baseline and intervening visits 2-4. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Pain Subscale results from the sum of 5 questions.
Week 0, week 3, week 6
Percentage Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 3, week 6
Percentage of difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score between baseline and intervening visits 2-4. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales. The WOMAC Physical Function Subscale comprises 17 questions each rated on a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no difficulty (0mm) to extreme difficulty (100mm).
Week 0, week 3, week 6
Multiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Patients rated their knee pain by marking a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm).
12 weeks
Investigator Global Rating of Pain Relief
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The Investigator Global Rating of Pain is a 3-item Likert-scale to answer the following question: "How do you rate this patient's overall pain relief with the drug?" with 3 possible answers: "very effective", "effective", or "ineffective".
12 weeks
Dropout Rate
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Reasons for withdrawal from the trial were collected
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2003

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 30, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2012

Last Verified

April 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Tramadol Once A Day

3
Subscribe