- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00868062
Responses to Colloid Infusions
November 15, 2011 updated by: University of Nottingham
Do 100 kiloDaltons Matter? A Prospective Randomised Double-blind Study on the Blood Volume Expanding Effects of Two Different Colloids in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
In situations such as dehydration, illness and surgery, fluid 'drips' are given to patients to keep them hydrated.
Different fluids stay in the circulation for different lengths of time.
For example, some types of fluid remain in the circulation for a short time which means patients would need to be given more fluid to achieve the desired effects.
Giving a lot of fluid to sick patients can in itself cause problems, for example, it can affect the way the bowels work and delay the patient's recovery from illness.
In these situations the investigators use specialized fluids called colloids, that are designed to stay in the circulation for longer.
This means a smaller amount of fluid needs to be used and less problems are likely to occur.
There are two different types of colloids that are commonly used, but the investigators do not know which of them is better.
The purpose of this study is to investigate which of the two different colloids (one is called Gelofusin and the other is called Voluven) works better in patients who undergo surgery.
Knowing which of the two fluids works best in patients will help us improve the care of surgical patients.
The investigators hypothesis is that the fluid that has the larger size of molecules as part of the solution will work better during surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
To study the responses of patients to 1 litre infusions of Gelofusine (succinylated gelatine 40g/L) and Voluven (6% hydroxyethyl starch in 0.9% saline) over 1 h intraoperatively.
In particular, the extent and time course of the effects of the two infusions on haematocrit, serum albumin, serum biochemistry, plasma expanding capacity and the resultant urinary responses will be measured
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
24
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Nottinghamshire
-
Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom, NG17 4JL
- Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 60 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male and female patients aged 18-60 years undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for proven gallstone disease.
- BMI of 20-26 kg/m2
- Able to give voluntary written informed consent to participate in the study
- Able to understand the requirements of the study, including anonymous publication, and agree to co-operate with the study procedures
- (Females of child bearing age will be offered a pregnancy test)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a known history of allergic reaction to the colloid infusions
- Patients with acute cholecystitis or the systemic inflammatory response syndrome
- Patients with a serum bilirubin > 25 μmol/l
- Females who are pregnant or refuse to have a pregnancy test
- Patients with a haemoglobin < 10 g/l
- Patients with a history of acute pancreatitis
- Patients likely to undergo common bile duct exploration
- Patients with renal impairment, ischaemic heart disease, cardiac failure and chronic restrictive airways disease
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: 1
|
1 litre infusion following induction of anaesthesia
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
The magnitude and duration of the plasma volume expanding effects of the two colloids.
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
4 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
To determine the effects of the two infusions on serum and urinary osmolality, sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, urea, albumin, microalbumin and haematological parameters.
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
4 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dileep Lobo, FRCS, University of Nottingham
- Principal Investigator: Mukul Dube, FRCS, Sherwood Forrest Hospitals NHS Trust
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
April 1, 2009
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2011
Study Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2011
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 23, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
March 24, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
November 16, 2011
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 15, 2011
Last Verified
November 1, 2011
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 08101 colloidAug08
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesAmerican College of SurgeonsCompletedCholecystectomy, Laparoscopic | Appendectomy, Laparoscopic | Cholecystectomy, RoboticUnited States
-
Clinical Research Centre, MalaysiaCompletedComplication Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy | Conversion Laparoscopic to Open CholecystectomyMalaysia
-
Intuitive SurgicalRecruitingLaparoscopic Cholecystectomy | Robotic-assisted CholecystectomyUnited States
-
Mohamed Bakr Mohamed AhmedNot yet recruitingLaparoscopic Cholecystectomy
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedLaparoscopic CholecystectomyEgypt
-
Acibadem UniversityCompleted
-
Prisma Health-UpstateCompleted
-
Seoul National University Bundang HospitalCompletedCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicKorea, Republic of
-
Banaras Hindu UniversityCompletedCholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
Clinical Trials on Succinylated gelatine, 40g/L, (Gelofusine - B Braun)
-
Kratochvil Milan, MDIBA - Masaryk University Institute of biostatistics and analysesUnknownHip Replacement, Total | Hemorrhage, Surgical | Thrombocytopathy
-
Tampere UniversityFinnish Cultural Foundation; Sigrid Jusélius Foundation; Päivikki and Sakari... and other collaboratorsRecruitingRenal Insufficiency | Aortic Stenosis | Primary Hypertension | Secondary HypertensionFinland