A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of a New Malaria Vaccine Candidate by Infecting Vaccinated Volunteers With Malaria Parasites

November 28, 2012 updated by: University of Oxford

Assessment of Protection Against Malaria by Sporozoite Challenge of Healthy Adults Vaccinated With AdCh63 ME-TRAP and MVA ME-TRAP

Malaria affects around 515 million people each year, about a million of whom die from the disease. It is a major problem for those who live in affected areas as well as for travellers to affected areas. There is a great need for a safe, effective malaria vaccine. The purpose of this study is to test 2 new vaccination regimes that include a new malaria vaccine candidate, for their ability to prevent malaria infection.

The vaccines are different types of virus which contain genetic information (DNA) from the malaria parasite. This genetic material is named ME-TRAP. The aim is to use these viruses to help the body make an immune response against the malaria parasite. Both viruses are inactivated so that they are unable to multiply within the body.

The first vaccine virus is a weakened version of a common cold virus. Such adenoviruses occur in many strain types and commonly infect chimpanzees as well as people and this vaccine uses a strain originally derived from a chimpanzee. The vaccine is called AdCh63 ME-TRAP.

The other virus is Modified Vaccinia Ankara Virus, (MVA), which is a safer form of the vaccine virus previously widely used for smallpox vaccination. The vaccine is called MVA ME-TRAP.

This study will enable the investigators to assess:

  1. The ability of different vaccine combinations to prevent malaria infection
  2. The safety of the vaccine combinations in healthy volunteers
  3. The response of the human immune system to the vaccines

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Headington
      • Oxford, Headington, United Kingdom, OX3 7LJ
        • Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able and willing (in the Investigator's opinion) to comply with all study requirements
  • Willing to allow the investigators to discuss the volunteer's medical history with their General Practitioner
  • For females only: willingness to practise effective contraception throughout the study
  • Agreement to refrain from blood donation during the course of the study
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in another research study involving an investigational product in the 30 days preceding enrolment, or planned use during the study period.
  • Prior receipt of an investigational malaria vaccine encoding ME-TRAP or any other investigational vaccine likely to impact on interpretation of the trial data
  • Administration of immunoglobulins and/or any blood products within the three months preceding the planned administration of the vaccine candidate
  • Any confirmed or suspected immunosuppressive or immunodeficient state, including HIV infection; asplenia; recurrent, severe infections and chronic (more than 14 days) immunosuppressant medication within the past 6 months (inhaled and topical steroids are allowed)
  • Pregnancy, lactation or intention to become pregnant during the study
  • Contraindication to both anti-malarial drugs (Riamet® and chloroquine)

    o concomitant use with other drugs known to cause QT-interval prolongation, ( e.g. macrolides, quinolones, amiodarone etc)

  • History of allergic disease or reactions likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccine, e.g. egg products, Kathon.
  • History of clinically significant contact dermatitis
  • Any history of anaphylaxis in reaction to vaccination
  • History of cancer (except basal cell carcinoma of the skin and cervical carcinoma in situ)
  • History of serious psychiatric condition
  • Any other serious chronic illness requiring hospital specialist supervision
  • Suspected or known current alcohol abuse as defined by an alcohol intake of greater than 42 units every week
  • Suspected or known injecting drug abuse
  • Seropositive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)
  • Seropositive for hepatitis C virus (antibodies to HCV)
  • Seropositive for simian adenovirus 63 (antibodies to AdCh63) at a titre > 1: 200 ( EXCEPT CONTROL VOLUNTEERS)
  • Any other significant disease, disorder or finding, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the volunteer at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the volunteer's ability to participate in the study.
  • History of clinical P. falciparum malaria
  • Travel to a malaria endemic region during the study period or within the previous six months
  • Any clinically significant abnormal finding on screening biochemistry or haematology blood tests or urinalysis
  • Any other finding which in the opinion of the investigators would significantly increase the risk of having an adverse outcome from participating in the protocol or impair interpretation of the study data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1
AdCh63 ME-TRAP prime followed by MVA ME-TRAP boost 8 weeks later and challenged by sporozoite 3 weeks after boost
5 x 10*10 vp IM
2 x 10*8 pfu ID
Infected mosquito bite
Experimental: Group 2
AdCh63 ME-TRAP alone followed by sporozoite challenge 3 weeks later
5 x 10*10 vp IM
Infected mosquito bite
Experimental: Group 3
Non-vaccinated Control for Groups 1 and 2 challenged with sporozoite
Infected mosquito bite
Experimental: Group 4
AdCh63 ME-TRAP prime followed by MVA ME-TRAP boost 8 weeks later and challenged by sporozoite 11 weeks after boost
5 x 10*10 vp IM
2 x 10*8 pfu ID
Infected mosquito bite
Experimental: Group 5
AdCh63 ME-TRAP prime followed by MVA ME-TRAP boost 8 weeks later and challenged by sporozoite 3 weeks after boost
5 x 10*10 vp IM
2 x 10*8 pfu ID
Infected mosquito bite
Experimental: Group 6
Protected volunteers from Group 1 re-challenged with sporozoite after 6 months
5 x 10*10 vp IM
Infected mosquito bite
Experimental: Group 7
Non vaccinated control for Groups 4-6, 8-10 challenged with sporozoite
Infected mosquito bite
Experimental: Group 8
3 vaccinations of mixture formulation AdCh63 ME-TRAP and MVA ME-TRAP give at 8 weeks interval each followed by sporozoite challenge 3 weeks after last vaccination
Infected mosquito bite
AdCh63 ME-TRAP 5 x 10*10 vp MVA ME-TRAP 2 x 10*8 pfu
Experimental: Group 9
2 vaccinations of mixture formulation AdCh63 ME-TRAP and MVA ME-TRAP give at 8 weeks interval followed by sporozoite challenge 3 weeks after last vaccination
Infected mosquito bite
AdCh63 ME-TRAP 5 x 10*10 vp MVA ME-TRAP 2 x 10*8 pfu
Experimental: Group 10
3 vaccinations of mixture formulation AdCh63 ME-TRAP and MVA ME-TRAP give at 4 weeks interval each followed by sporozoite challenge 3 weeks after last vaccination
Infected mosquito bite
AdCh63 ME-TRAP 5 x 10*10 vp MVA ME-TRAP 2 x 10*8 pfu

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Vaccine prevention (partial or complete) of malaria infection by sporozoite challenge
Time Frame: Approxiamately 5-16 months following last intervention
Approxiamately 5-16 months following last intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Safety of vaccine
Time Frame: Approxiamately 5-16 months following last intervention
Approxiamately 5-16 months following last intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

April 30, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 29, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2012

Last Verified

November 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MAL 034

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malaria

Clinical Trials on AdCh63 ME-TRAP

Subscribe