Feasibility Study to Determine the Effects of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Periodic Breathing

January 2, 2014 updated by: Respicardia, Inc.

The purpose of this feasibility study is to determine the effect of stimulating the phrenic nerve to treat periodic breathing (a pattern of breathing characterized by hyperpneas followed by hypopneas or apneas). Clinically, these physiologic events translate into sleep fragmentation, excessive daytime sleepiness, reduced exercise capacity, and possibly ventricular arrhythmias.

Stage 1 of the study is acute in nature, such that subjects will undergo the placement of a stimulation lead, followed by assessment of stimulation of the phrenic nerve using the lead for up to 2 nights of sleep. A sensing lead may also be placed during the initial implant procedure. Observational data will be obtained and stimulation provided using an externalized system connected to the study leads. Following the study, all investigational components will be removed from the patient.

Stage 2 of the study is being conducted at one of the participating sites to determine the initial safety of chronic stimulation of the phrenic nerve in a limited number of patients with sleep disordered breathing. It is anticipated that data obtained in this feasibility study will show that the proposed intervention can modify respiration with a low incidence of adverse effects. The results of this trial are intended to be used to develop a subsequent protocol for a multi-center study of chronic phrenic nerve pacing.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nanjing, China
        • Jiangsu Province Hospital
      • Wroclaw, Poland
        • Polish Military Hospital
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
        • Hennepin County Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
        • Ohio Heart Hospital
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States
        • The Ohio State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is 18 years of age or older
  • Patient has a demonstrated history of periodic breathing (symptoms may include sleep fragmentation, as reported by patient or as witnessed by another person, night arousal after apneic episodes, reduced exercise capacity, and daytime sleepiness)
  • Patient is expected to be able to tolerate the procedure and remain clinically stable for the duration of the study (e.g. the subject is able to lie down long enough to insert the lead(s) without shortness of breath and the subject is able to tolerate instrumentation during study).
  • Patient or their legal representative is willing and able to sign an IRB/MEC approved informed consent (and a privacy protection authorization in the United States)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Baseline oxygen saturation less than or equal to 90% on a stable FIO2
  • Evidence of phrenic nerve palsy
  • Temperature > 38.0 degrees Celsius
  • Inability to place catheter (e.g. previously known coagulopathy, distorted anatomy, etc.)
  • Patient is currently enrolled in another study that may confound the results of this study
  • Patient for whom informed consent cannot be obtained
  • Patient who is pregnant or of child bearing potential without a negative pregnancy test within 10 days of the study procedure
  • Patients implanted with a pacemaker, implantable defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization device who are unable to tolerate turning off the device for the duration of the system testing procedure (based on medical judgment)
  • Patients with severe COPD (per GOLD scale)
  • Patients with a history of myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to the study
  • Patients with unstable angina
  • Patients who are intolerant of or allergic to contrast dye
  • Patients who are contraindicated for <1mg of steroid (on the stimulation lead).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Phrenic Stimulation
In Stage 1, a stimulation lead will be introduced via standard access methods and positioned to provide stimulation. A second lead may also be placed for sensing purposes. The proximal portions of the implanted lead(s) will remain externalized such that stimulation and observation can be made using external stimulation and recording equipment. Study subjects will be observed and stimulation will be performed for up to 2 nights of sleep in a clinically supported environment. In Stage 2, a stimulation device and lead will be permanently implanted.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary goal of this feasibility study is to show an acute improvement in respiration.
Time Frame: Acute (up to 2 nights of sleep)
Acute (up to 2 nights of sleep)
The primary safety endpoint of the study is the absence of adverse events related to stimulation that result in hospitalization, the prolongation of an existing hospitalization, or death of the patient.
Time Frame: Acute (up to 2 nights of sleep) plus post-operative assessment at one week (5-10 days) or until resolution of an observed adverse event.
Acute (up to 2 nights of sleep) plus post-operative assessment at one week (5-10 days) or until resolution of an observed adverse event.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Characterization of chronic safety of stimulating the phrenic nerve (Stage 2 of study).
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

May 27, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 6, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cheyne-Stokes Respiration

Clinical Trials on Phrenic stimulation device

3
Subscribe