Neomycin and Rifaximin Plus Neomycin in Treating Methane Positive Constipation Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (C-IBS)

July 17, 2015 updated by: Mark Pimentel, MD

Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Trial Comparing Neomycin to Rifaximin Plus Neomycin in the Treatment of Methane Positive Subjects With Constipation-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome

In this study the investigators aim to compare the efficacy of neomycin to a combination of rifaximin and neomycin in the treatment of C-IBS subjects with methane on their breath test. This study will be conducted in collaboration with Dr. John DiBaise at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, AZ and Dr. Satish Rao in Georgia Regents University in Augusta, GA.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
        • Georgia Health Sciences University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Rome III positive IBS subjects (18-75 years of age)
  • Meet criteria for constipation predominant IBS symptoms including ≤ 3 complete spontaneous bowel movements per week with hard or lumpy stools.
  • Presence of detectable methane on single breath sample (≥ 3ppm).
  • If subjects are ≥ 50 years old, a colonoscopy had to have been completed within the past 5 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with history of intestinal surgery (except appendectomy or cholecystectomy)
  • Recent antibiotic use (within the last 30 days)
  • Subjects with known pelvic floor dysfunction
  • Pregnancy
  • Creatinine level > 1.4
  • Poorly controlled/uncontrolled significant medical condition that would interfere with study procedures
  • Subjects with hearing loss and/or tinnitus
  • History of bowel obstruction
  • History of celiac disease
  • History of inflammatory bowel disease
  • Cirrhosis
  • Diabetes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1
Group 1 will receive neomycin (500 mg po bid) and placebo (tid) for 14 days
500 mg po bid for 14 days
Other Names:
  • Mycifradin
  • Neo-Fradin
  • Neo-Tab
placebo for 14 days tid
Experimental: Group 2
Group 2 will receive neomycin (500 mg po bid) and rifaximin (550mg po tid) for 14 days
500 mg po bid for 14 days
Other Names:
  • Mycifradin
  • Neo-Fradin
  • Neo-Tab
550 mg po tid
Other Names:
  • Xifaxan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of Constipation in Each Arm at Week 1 After Completion of Therapy
Time Frame: 1 year

Visual analog scale (VAS) score for constipation:

Severity was rated using a VAS from 0 to 100 units (with 0 = no symptom and 100 = severe symptoms).

1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Methane From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Final Visit (Day 44)

Methane output was reported as methane in parts per million (ppm) on breath test:

Subjects fast for 12 h prior to a breath sample. Breath samples were collected via a Quintron dual bag collecting system and analyzed using a BreathTracker SC. Output was reported as methane in parts per million (ppm) after correction for alveolar sample quality using breath CO2 concentration.

Baseline (Day 0) and Final Visit (Day 44)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark Pimentel, MD, FRCP(C), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

July 24, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 10, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe