- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00952588
Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of AZD1152 Alone and in Combination With Low Dose Cytosine Arabinoside (LDAC)in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) Patients (SPARK-AML1)
February 21, 2020 updated by: AstraZeneca
A Randomised, Open-label, Multi-centre, 2-stage, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of AZD1152 Alone and in Combination With Low Dose Cytosine Arabinoside (LDAC) in Comparison With LDAC Alone in Patients Aged ≥ 60 With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML)
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of AZD1152 alone and in combination with low dose cytosine arabinoside (LDAC) in comparison with LDAC alone in AML patients.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
74
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New South Wales
-
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Research Site
-
-
Queensland
-
Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Research Site
-
-
Victoria
-
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Research Site
-
Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Angers Cedex 01, France
- Research Site
-
Clermont-ferrand, France
- Research Site
-
Grenoble Cedex 09, France
- Research Site
-
Lyon Cedex 03, France
- Research Site
-
Marseille Cedex 09, France
- Research Site
-
Nantes, France
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Duisburg, Germany
- Research Site
-
Erlangen, Germany
- Research Site
-
Frankfurt, Germany
- Research Site
-
Munster, Germany
- Research Site
-
Villingen-schwenningen, Germany
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Roma, Italy
- Research Site
-
-
BO
-
Bologna, BO, Italy
- Research Site
-
-
GE
-
Genova, GE, Italy
- Research Site
-
-
TO
-
Orbassano, TO, Italy
- Research Site
-
-
UD
-
Udine, UD, Italy
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Fukuoka, Japan
- Research Site
-
-
Aichi
-
Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
- Research Site
-
-
Fukui
-
Yoshida-gun, Fukui, Japan
- Research Site
-
-
Gunma
-
Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
- Research Site
-
-
Kanagawa
-
Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
- Research Site
-
Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
- Research Site
-
-
Tokyo
-
Chuo, Tokyo, Japan
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Brasov, Romania
- Research Site
-
TG Mures, Romania
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
Asturias
-
Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
- Research Site
-
-
Cataluna
-
Badalona(barcelona), Cataluna, Spain
- Research Site
-
Barcelona, Cataluna, Spain
- Research Site
-
-
Comunidad DE Madrid
-
Madrid, Comunidad DE Madrid, Spain
- Research Site
-
-
Comunidad Valenciana
-
Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain
- Research Site
-
-
Madrid
-
Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
-
Brighton, United Kingdom
- Research Site
-
London, United Kingdom
- Research Site
-
-
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Research Site
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States
- Research Site
-
-
South Carolina
-
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States
- Research Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Provision of written informed consent
- Newly diagnosed male or female patients aged 60 and over
- De Novo or Secondary AML
- Not eligible for intensive induction with anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy as a result of at least one of the following:Age ≥75 years; Adverse cytogenetics, e.g., as defined by the MRC Prognostic Groupings; WHO performance status >2; Organ dysfunction arising from significant co-morbidities not directly linked to leukaemia
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participation in another clinical study in which an investigational product was received within 14 days before the first dose in this study, or at any time if the patient has not recovered from side-effects associated with that investigational product
- Administration of LDAC is clinically contraindicated
- Patients with AML of FAB M3 classification Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia (APL)
- Patients with blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukaemia
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: AZD1152 1200 mg
AZD1152 1200 mg, iv, 7 day infusion monotherapy
|
1200 mg, iv, 7 day infusion
|
Active Comparator: LDAC 20 mg
LDAC 20 mg, sc, bd, 10 days (400mg per cycle)
|
20 mg, sc, bd, 10 days
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Patients With Overall Complete Response for Stage I
Time Frame: IWG Cheson criteria every 28 days from randomization for study duration (24 months, between 2009 - 2011)
|
Percentage of patients achieving either a complete response (CR) or a confirmed complete remission with incomplete recovery of neutrophils or platelets (confirmed CRi).
Per Cheson Criteria: Confirmed complete remission (CRi) is defined as a disappearance of blasts in the peripheral blood; a decrease in bone marrow blasts to <5% total bone marrow nucleated cells demonstrated in bone marrow aspirate; absence of Auer rods; no persistent extramedullary leukaemia.
Complete response (CR) is defined as all requirements to meet CRi and in addition: recovery of neutrophils to ≥1.0 x 109/L and platelets to ≥100 x 109/L; transfusion-independence.
|
IWG Cheson criteria every 28 days from randomization for study duration (24 months, between 2009 - 2011)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Duration of Response (DoR): Stage I and Transition Phase
Time Frame: DoR was measured every 28 days from randomization for study duration (24 months, between 2009 - 2011)
|
DoR was defined for the median of days which showed a confirmed CRi or CR, as the time from first documented evidence of CRi or CR until the first documented sign of disease progression or death.
Duration of Response was measured from the Response Start date until evidence of patient relapse or death.
Stage I : 45 patients randomized in a 2:1 ratio to AZD1152 or LDAC.
Transition phase: enrollment of up to 30 additional patients randomized as per stage I.
|
DoR was measured every 28 days from randomization for study duration (24 months, between 2009 - 2011)
|
Disease Free Survival (DFS)
Time Frame: DFS was measured every 28 days from randomization for study duration (24 months, between 2009 - 2011)
|
Disease-free Survival is defined as the time from randomisation to relapse or death from any cause.
|
DFS was measured every 28 days from randomization for study duration (24 months, between 2009 - 2011)
|
Time To Complete Response (TTCR)
Time Frame: Response was measured every 28 days from randomization for study duration (24 months, between 2009 - 2011)
|
TTCR is measured as time from randomization to either a complete response (CR) or a confirmed complete remission with incomplete recovery of neutrophils or platelets (confirmed CRi)
|
Response was measured every 28 days from randomization for study duration (24 months, between 2009 - 2011)
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Assessed from randomisation until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 24 months
|
Overall Survival is defined as the median time from randomisation to death from any cause.
Patients who were not known to have died at the time of the analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive.
|
Assessed from randomisation until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 24 months
|
Percent of Patients With Worsened Trial Outcome Index (TOI)
Time Frame: TOI was measured every 28 days from randomization for study duration (24 months, between 2009 - 2011)
|
TOI is derived from the sum of the Functional Well Being (FWB), Physical Well Being (PWB) and additional subscales of the FACT-Leu.
The TOI subscale consists of 31 items with TOI scores ranging from 0 to 124.
The TOI is described as a summary measure of HRQoL.
Higher scores indicate better HRQoL.
Negative changes from baseline indicate a worsening of HRQoL while positive changes indicate an improvement in HRQoL.
A response of "Worsened" was a change from baseline in score of less than or equal to -9.
|
TOI was measured every 28 days from randomization for study duration (24 months, between 2009 - 2011)
|
Percent of Patients With Worsened Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Leukaemia (FACT-Leu) Score.
Time Frame: FACT-Leu was measured every 28 days from randomization for study duration (24 months, between 2009 - 2011)
|
The total FACT-Leu score consists of 44 items with total scores ranging from 0 to 176.
Higher scores indicate better HRQoL.
Negative changes from baseline indicate a worsening of HRQoL while positive changes indicate an improvement in HRQoL.
A response of "Worsened" was a change from baseline in score of less than or equal to -11.
|
FACT-Leu was measured every 28 days from randomization for study duration (24 months, between 2009 - 2011)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Paul Stockman, AstraZeneca
- Principal Investigator: Hagop Kantarjian, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
July 1, 2009
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2011
Study Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2011
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 4, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
August 6, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 24, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 21, 2020
Last Verified
February 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- D1531C00009
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia
-
University of PennsylvaniaActive, not recruitingAcute Myeloid Leukemia, in Relapse | Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Refractory | Acute Myeloid Leukemia, PediatricUnited States
-
Terrence J Bradley, MDImago BioSciences, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., (Rahway, New...RecruitingAcute Myeloid Leukemia | Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Acute Myeloid Leukemia, in RelapseUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingAcute Myeloid Leukemia | Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Recurrent Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Refractory Acute Myeloid LeukemiaUnited States
-
Bhavana BhatnagarCTI BioPharmaCompletedRecurrent Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Untreated Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid LeukemiaUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineWithdrawnRefractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Relapsed Acute Myeloid LeukemiaUnited States
-
C. Babis AndreadisGateway for Cancer Research; AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc.TerminatedAcute Myeloid Leukemia | Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Relapsed Acute Myeloid LeukemiaUnited States
-
Jacqueline Garcia, MDEli Lilly and CompanyCompletedCombination Merestinib and LY2874455 for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid LeukemiaRelapsed Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Refractory Adult Acute Myeloid LeukemiaUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalExelixisCompletedRefractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Relapsed Acute Myeloid LeukemiaUnited States
-
University of NebraskaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingSecondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Adult Acute Myeloid LeukemiaUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingAcute Myeloid Leukemia | Recurrent Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Refractory Acute Myeloid LeukemiaUnited States
Clinical Trials on AZD1152
-
AstraZenecaCompletedAcute Myeloid LeukaemiaUnited Kingdom
-
Oxford University Hospitals NHS TrustUniversity of Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust; Early Phase Cancer...Completed
-
AstraZenecaCompletedMyeloid LeukemiaUnited States, Italy, Netherlands, France
-
AstraZenecaCompletedAcute Myeloid LeukaemiaJapan
-
AstraZenecaTerminated
-
AstraZenecaTerminated
-
AstraZenecaTerminatedAcute Myeloid LeukaemiaUnited States, Australia
-
PATHLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine; University of Rwanda; Rwanda Biomedical...Completed
-
AstraZenecaCompletedAcute Myeloid LeukemiaUnited States, France