Trinity Evolution in Posterior or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF/TLIF) (TLF)

October 21, 2018 updated by: Orthofix Inc.

A Radiographic and Clinical Study Evaluating a Novel Allogeneic, Cancellous, Bone Matrix Containing Viable Stem Cells (Trinity Evolution™ Viable Cryopreserved Cellular Bone Matrix) in Posterior Lumbar or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF or TLIF)

The purpose of this study is to utilize Trinity Evolution in conjunction with an interbody spacer and supplemental posterior fixation of the surgeon's choice and to follow the patients to measure the clinical outcomes and rate of fusion. The hypothesis of the study is that Trinity Evolution combined with an interbody spacer and supplemental posterior fixation will result in fusion rates and clinical outcomes similar to those with other routinely used autograft and allograft materials including: fusion, improvement in pain and function, maintenance of lower extremity neurological function, and absence of serious adverse events related to the use of the Trinity Evolution product.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine can lead to a multitude of clinical problems including back pain and/or leg pain secondary to nerve compression and/or deformity. When conservative (non-surgical) treatment fails after at least a 6 month period and/or non-operative treatment is not indicated, patients and physicians may turn to a surgical solution. Surgical options consist basically of decompressing nerves, correcting and/or stabilizing deformities if required and fusing the segment, depending on the clinical situation. The "gold standard" for aiding healing in spinal fusion surgeries is the harvesting of autograft from the patient's iliac crest and placing it in and around the segments of the spine that are intended to be fused. Autograft is considered the "gold standard" because it contains the essential elements required for successful bone grafting: osteogenesis, osteoconduction, and osteoinduction.

However, the morbidity of harvesting autograft has been well documented and includes chronic donor-site pain, infection, neurologic injury, blood loss, deformity, bowel injury, hernia, and prolonged surgical and hospitalization time. There are now a number of products on the market to minimize or replace the use of autograft. However, few of these products contain all three essential bone-forming elements (osteogenesis, osteoconduction, and osteoinduction) in a single, stand alone product.

Trinity Evolution is a novel, allogeneic cancellous bone matrix containing viable osteoprogenitor cells, mesenchymal stem cells and a demineralized cortical bone (DCB) component to provide the required osteoconduction, osteogenesis, and osteoinduction necessary for successful bone grafting. Preclinical studies with Trinity Evolution have demonstrated in-vitro and in-vivo safety and effectiveness. Trinity Evolution is considered an allograft and as such is a "minimally manipulated" tissue and is labeled for bone repair for spinal, orthopedic and podiatric indications where autograft is used. The dosage will be dependent upon the specific requirements of the case.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

207

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Boulder, Colorado, United States, 80304
        • Boulder Neurosurgical Associates
    • Connecticut
      • Canton, Connecticut, United States, 06019
        • Total Spine Care
      • Middletown, Connecticut, United States, 06457
        • Middlesex Orthopedic Surgeons
      • New Britain, Connecticut, United States, 06051
        • Center for Advanced Neuro and Spine
    • Georgia
      • Savannah, Georgia, United States, 31405
        • Optim Healthcare (Formerly Southeastern Orthopedic Center)
    • Illinois
      • Palos Heights, Illinois, United States, 60463
        • Parkview Orthopaedic Group
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71105
        • Willis Knighton Health System
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan A. Alfred Taubman Health Care Center
    • New Jersey
      • Camden, New Jersey, United States, 08103
        • Cooper University Neurological Institute
    • New York
      • Niagara Falls, New York, United States, 14304
        • Spine Surgery of Buffalo Niagara
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
        • Carolina NeuroSurgery & Spine
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27704
        • Triangle Orthopaedic Associates
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27607
        • Triangle Neurosurgery
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23226
        • Tuckahoe Orthopedic Surgeons

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease scheduled to undergo PLIF or TLIF.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease at 1 or 2 adjacent levels between L3 and S1
  • Patients with back and/or leg pain scheduled for stabilization with or without decompression via a TLIF or PLIF approach utilizing an interbody spacer and supplemental posterior fixation.
  • Greater than 18 years of age
  • Unresponsive to conservative care over a period of at least 6 months or has progressive neurological signs and/or symptoms of neurological compromise that mandate urgent surgical intervention
  • Willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol including follow-up requirements
  • Willing and able to sign a study specific informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring surgical treatment other than at 1 or 2 adjacent levels between L3 and S1
  • Active local or systemic infection
  • Currently pregnant or considering becoming pregnant during the follow-up period
  • Active malignancy or having been on chemotherapy of any kind for a malignancy in the past 1 year
  • Use of any other bone graft or bone graft substitute in addition to or in place of Trinity Evolution matrix in and around the interbody spacer.
  • Use of adjunctive post-operative stimulation
  • Prior interbody surgery at the same level
  • Has a known history of hypersensitivity or anaphylactic reaction to dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Fusion Rates for Trinity Evolution
Time Frame: Operative to 24 months follow-up
Operative to 24 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
NDI relative improvement; VAS improvement; Maintenance or improvement of neurological function
Time Frame: Pre-op to 24 months follow-up
Pre-op to 24 months follow-up
Complication Rates for Trinity Evolution
Time Frame: Operative to 24 months
Operative to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: James T Ryaby, PhD, Orthofix Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

August 25, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Disc Disease

Subscribe