Endoscopy Every 2 Years or Only as Needed in Monitoring Patients With Barrett Esophagus

August 17, 2017 updated by: Clive Stokes, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Barrett's Oesophagus Two Yearly Surveillance Versus Endoscopy at Need: a Randomised Controlled Trial to Estimate Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness Study (BOSS)

RATIONALE: Screening tests may help doctors find cancer cells early and plan better treatment. It is not yet known whether endoscopy every 2 years is more effective than endoscopy only as needed in finding esophageal cancer in patients with Barrett esophagus.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying endoscopy every 2 years to see how well it works compared with endoscopy only as needed in monitoring patients with Barrett esophagus.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • To establish whether endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only is superior in terms of overall survival and, if neither is superior, whether endoscopy at need only is non-inferior to surveillance every 2 years in patients with Barrett esophagus.

Secondary

  • To estimate the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic surveillance every 2 years as compared to endoscopy at need only.
  • To establish whether there is a significant difference between endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only in terms of the incidence of esophageal cancer, gastric or esophageal cancer, or all cancers.
  • To establish whether there is a significant difference between endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only in terms of the time to diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
  • To establish whether there is a significant difference between endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only in terms of the stage of esophageal adenocarcinoma at diagnosis using TNM staging.
  • To establish whether there is a significant difference between endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only in terms of morbidity and mortality related to endoscopy, esophageal surgery, and other endoscopy-related interventions (e.g., ablation).
  • To establish whether there is a significant difference between endoscopic surveillance every 2 years or endoscopy at need only in terms of the frequency of endoscopy.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to age at diagnosis (< 65 years vs ≥ 65 years), length of Barrett metaplasia segment including tongues (< 2 cm vs ≥ 2 cm and ≤ 3 cm vs > 3 cm and ≤ 8 cm vs > 8 cm), and newly diagnosed disease (defined as the date of endoscopy confirming Barrett metaplasia was within the past 4 months) (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 intervention arms.

  • Arm I: Patients undergo surveillance endoscopy with quadrantic biopsies taken every 2 cm. Patients undergo endoscopy every 2 years for a total of 6 endoscopies over 10 years.
  • Arm II: Patients undergo endoscopy as needed over 10 years. All patients may undergo urgent endoscopy if they develop dysphagia, unexplained weight loss of > 7 lb, iron-deficiency anemia, recurrent vomiting, or worsening upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

All patients complete a questionnaire that includes a quality-of-life measure and questions about medication at baseline, every 2 years, and following key events (e.g., diagnosis of any cancer or high-grade dysplasia).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • England
      • Gloucester, England, United Kingdom, GL1 3NN
        • Gloucestershire Royal Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 120 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed circumferential Barrett metaplasia meeting 1 of the following criteria:

    • At least 1 cm from the gastro-esophageal junction
    • At least a 2 cm non-circumferential tongue of Barrett metaplasia
  • Undergone endoscopy within the last 2 years to confirm Barrett metaplasia and exclude high-grade dysplasia and carcinoma
  • No known high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Resident of the United Kingdom
  • Informed of the risk of Barrett esophagus developing into esophageal cancer, either at the visit when the invitation letter is issued or on a documented previous occasion
  • Able to undergo endoscopy
  • No medical conditions that would make endoscopy difficult or hazardous

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 2 yearly endoscopies
Two years endoscopies
2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
QOL aims to elicit any differences in QOL between 2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
All Barretts patients to be screened
Experimental: endoscopy at need
Endoscopy only when patient reports symptoms
2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
QOL aims to elicit any differences in QOL between 2 yearly endoscopy versus endoscopy at need
All Barretts patients to be screened

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Overall survival

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Cost-effectiveness
Incidence of esophageal cancer, gastric or esophageal cancer, or all cancers
Time to diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma
Stage of esophageal adenocarcinoma at diagnosis using TNM staging
Morbidity and mortality related to endoscopy, esophageal surgery, and other endoscopy-related interventions
Frequency of endoscopy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hugh Barr, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

October 1, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Cancer

Clinical Trials on 2 yearly endoscopy

3
Subscribe