Comparative Study to Examine Whether Echocardiography Performed During Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Implantation Can Improve the Response Rate (E-OPT)

September 3, 2015 updated by: Ngai Yin Chan, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong

OPTimization of Left-Ventricular Lead Implantation by Echocardiography- E-OPT Study

Empirical implantation of the left ventricular lead is the prevailing practice in cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation. The response rate to the therapy has been uniformly 70% only despite various methods to screen patients before device implantation. This study tested the hypothesis that echocardiography to assess acute resynchronization of the left ventricle during device implantation may improve the response rate to the therapy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, China, 852
        • Princess Margaret Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with SR or AF, indicated for CRT procedures (NYHA Class III or ambulatory Class IV despite optimal medical therapy, QRSd≥120ms and LVEF≤35%)
  2. Patients with ischaemic or non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy can be recruited

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients already implanted with an implantable cardiac device, undergoing device upgrade or generator replacement
  2. Patients who aged less than 18 or over 80.
  3. Patients who are pregnant.
  4. Patients who cannot give informed consent.
  5. Patients who are judged to have severe mental impairment and cannot report symptoms of heart failure during follow-up.
  6. Patients who have comorbid congenital heart disease.
  7. Patients who have severe valvular heart disease, apart from severe mitral regurgitation.
  8. Patients who have unstable angina or who are within 1 month of myocardial infarction.
  9. Patients who have severe lung disease and accurate clinical assessment for heart failure symptoms cannot be performed.
  10. Patients who have poor echocardiographic windows precluding reliable echocardiographic examination during baseline assessment, CRT procedures or follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Empirical
Empirical implantation of the left ventricular lead during cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation
Empirical implantation of the left ventricular lead during cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation
Experimental: Echocardiography-guided approach
Echocardiography-guided implantation of the left ventricular lead during cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation
Echocardiography-guided implantation of the left ventricular lead during cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Clinical response (Improvement in functional class status by at least one NYHA Class or ≥10% increase in 6-minute hall walk distance) to CRT
Time Frame: 6 months after device implantation
6 months after device implantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Echocardiographic response of ≥15% reduction in LVESV
Time Frame: 6 months after device implantation
6 months after device implantation
Echocardiographic response of absolute increase of ≥5% in LVEF
Time Frame: 6 months after device implantation
6 months after device implantation
Biochemical response with reduction of BNP level≥15%
Time Frame: 6 months after device implantation
6 months after device implantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ngai Yin Chan, MBBS, Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

November 16, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 4, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2015

Last Verified

September 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EOPT01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Empirical group

Subscribe