CT-FIRST: Cardiac Computed Tomography Versus Stress Imaging For Initial Risk STratification (CT-FIRST)

June 27, 2012 updated by: Todd C. Villines, Walter Reed Army Medical Center
In patients with chest pain or shortness of breath who are referred for stress imaging tests (either stress echocardiography or stress nuclear testing), the investigators seek to compare impact of using cardiac CT scans of the heart arteries to the stress test that their doctors ordered.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The current evaluation for chest pain in low and intermediate risk patients typically starts with a functional assessment for coronary ischemia. Exercise treadmill testing is often selected as the initial diagnostic modality for coronary artery function. However, exercise treadmill testing is limited by its modest sensitivity and specificity, often resulting in further cardiac resource utilization for patient risk stratification and reassurance. Additionally, many patients with chest pain are not candidates for regular stress testing due to an abnormal baseline electrocardiogram or inability to exercise. Therefore, exercise or pharmacologic stress imaging is considered the standard of care for the evaluation of coronary artery function in a large percentage of patients with chest pain. However, each of the currently available stress imaging tests has well-documented limitations, resulting in a sizeable number of false negative and false positive studies. With the advent of coronary Multislice Computed Tomography (MSCT) angiography, coronary artery anatomy can now be accurately evaluated noninvasively. Despite its impressive performance characteristics, the role of coronary MSCT angiography in the evaluation of angina remains undefined. Furthermore, studies comparing MSCT to stress imaging are lacking. CT-FIRST compares the impact on downstream resource utilization and patient outcomes of an initial diagnostic strategy employing the addition of coronary MSCT angiography to stress imaging (exercise and pharmacologic stress echo and nuclear perfusion testing) with a standard-of-care diagnostic strategy of stress imaging for the evaluation of low-intermediate risk patients with possible angina. The study is a single center, prospective, non-blinded, randomized clinical trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

240

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20307
        • Walter Reed Army Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 70 years of age at time of enrollment.
  • Chest pain or anginal equivalent symptoms possibly suggestive of symptomatic coronary artery disease
  • Low-intermediate risk (<75% pretest probability) for symptomatic coronary artery disease on basis of age, sex, and quality of reported symptom as classified by the Diamond and Forrester scheme.
  • Referred for a either a stress echocardiogram or a nuclear stress perfusion study.
  • Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of known pre-existing coronary artery disease (known prior myocardial infarction, ECG evidence of prior infarction, prior angiographic evidence of significant coronary artery disease, history of prior coronary revascularization).
  • Previous outpatient or inpatient evaluation for coronary artery disease to include exercise treadmill testing, stress echocardiography or nuclear myocardial perfusion studies within the last 24 months.
  • Presence of signs or symptoms that are clearly compatible with non-cardiac chest pain, including musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal or neuropathic causes.
  • Renal insufficiency (creatinine >1.5mg/dl) or renal failure requiring dialysis.
  • Baseline heart rate > 100bpm, atrial fibrillation or other markedly irregular rhythm (frequent ectopy, multifocal atrial tachycardia) on baseline ECG.
  • Pregnancy or unknown pregnancy status.
  • Known allergy to iodinated contrast.
  • Inability to tolerate beta-blocking drugs, including patients with reactive airways disease requiring maintenance inhaled bronchodilators or steroids, complete heart block or second-degree atrioventricular block.
  • Patients with hyperthyroidism including Grave's disease and toxic multinodular goiter
  • Computed tomography imaging or iodinated contrast administration over 50 ml, within the past 48 hours.
  • Inability to withhold ingestion of metformin or commonly used erectile dysfunction medications (Viagra, Cialis, Levitra) for 48 hours prior to and following MSCT scan.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cardiac CT Arm
Patients referred for stress imaging due to complaints consistent with possible angina, randomized to receive an additional cardiac CT scan.
Patients randomized to CT Arm will undergo 64-slice cardiac CT angiography (single scan) in addition to the stress imaging test ordered by their physician
Active Comparator: No CT Arm
Patients with symptoms consistent with possible angina, randomized to receive the type of stress imaging test ordered by their physician.
Stress imaging test as ordered by the subjects provider without option for cardiac CT angiography (no CT arm)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rates of adverse cardiac events and resource utilization (rates of additional diagnostic tests that are performed for the initial complaint of angina/angina equivalent and clinical outpatient/inpatient/ED encounters for the initial cardiac complaint)
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Total number and per-patient rates of adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary revascularization)
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Total number and per-patient rates of subsequent cardiac diagnostic tests performed (stress tests, cardiac catheterizations, other tests) for the initial complaint of angina/angina equivalent
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Total number and per-patient rates of subsequent outpatient + inpatient + emergency department encounters for the initial cardiac complaint
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Avoidance of unnecessary cardiac catheterizations. An unnecessary cardiac catheterization is defined as a catheterization showing non-obstructive coronary disease and no cause for the symptoms.
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Change in motivation for healthy behavioral change
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Change in subject anxiety, as assessed by the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Change in subject depression
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Satisfaction with diagnostic evaluation for initial complaint.
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Todd C. Villines, M.D., Walter Reed Army Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

February 3, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 28, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2012

Last Verified

June 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Cardiac CT Angiography

Subscribe