Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Selective Cardiac Catheterization (CONSERVE)

March 21, 2017 updated by: MDDX LLC

Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Selective Cardiac Catheterization: Relation to CardioVascular Outcomes, Cost Effectiveness and Quality of Life

To determine the effectiveness, safety, and cost efficiency associated with a CCTA-guided selective catheterization strategy for stable patients but without known CAD and an American Heart Association/ American College of Cardiology Class II indication for non-emergent invasive coronary angiography.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A prospective, randomized controlled multicenter trial to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of a "selective catheterization" strategy versus a "direct catheterization" strategy for stable patients with suspected but without known CAD and clinical indication for non-emergent invasive coronary angiography. Subjects in the "selective catheterization" arm will be followed for a primary endpoint of non-inferiority for rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) as compare to subjects in the "direct catheterization" strategy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1631

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Curitiba, Brazil
        • Quanta Diagnostico Nuclear, Curitiba-PR
      • Hyderabad, India
        • FACTS
      • Monzino, Italy
        • Centro Cardiologico Monzino
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Gangnam Severance Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Severance Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Ajou University Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Gangneung Asan Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Korea University, Guro hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Pusan National University Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Yeongnam University Hospital
    • South Korea
      • Seoul, South Korea, Korea, Republic of
        • KangWon National University Hospital
      • Warsaw, Poland
        • Institute of Cardiology Warsaw
    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States
        • Walter Reed Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. Age >18 years
  2. Patients providing written informed consent
  3. Scheduled to undergo clinically-indicated non-emergent invasive coronary angiography with an ACC/AHA Class II indication

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. Known CAD (myocardial infarction, PCI, CABG)
  2. ACC/AHA Class I or III indication for ICA
  3. Non-cardiac illness with life expectancy <2 years
  4. Inability to provide written informed consent
  5. Concomitant participation in another clinical trial in which subject is subject to investigational drug or device
  6. Pregnant women
  7. Allergy to iodinated contrast agent
  8. Serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dl or Glomerular Filtration Rate <30 ml/min
  9. Uncontrolled Baseline irregular heart rhythm (e.g., atrial fibrillation, etc.)
  10. Heart rate ≥100 beats per minute

12) Systolic blood pressure ≤90 mm Hg 13) Contraindications to β blockers or nitroglycerin 14) Known complex congenital heart disease 15) Body mass index >35

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cardiac CT
Patients who undergo Cardiac CT (instead of Invasive Coronary Angiography)
Perform a non-invasive Cardiac CT Angiogram
Active Comparator: Invasive Coronary Angiography
Patients did not undergo Cardiac CT, went straight to Invasive Coronary Angiography
Patient undergoes Invasive Coronary Angiography

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MACE Endpoints
Time Frame: 1 year
  • Death
  • Non-fatal myocardial infarction
  • Unstable angina (including new onset angina or those requiring hospitalization, revascularization or that are troponin-positive)
  • Stroke
  • Urgent or emergent coronary revascularization
  • Cardiovascular hospitalization (including for angina, heart failure or other)
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Additional MACE Endpoints
Time Frame: 1 year
  • The primary composite MACE endpoint plus major bleeding.
  • The primary composite MACE endpoint plus major bleeding or need for urgent/ emergent surgery due to hemorrhage.
  • The primary composite MACE endpoint plus major bleeding plus need for urgent/ emergent surgery due to hemorrhage plus need for major transfusion.
1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Economic
Time Frame: 1 year

The secondary economic endpoint is within-trial cardiovascular costs*.

*Costs will include index- and downstream CAD-related costs related to diagnostic testing, medications, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, outpatient visits, and coronary revascularizations. (Costs will also include non-CAD-related but test related costs.)

1 year
Secondary Safety Endpoint
Time Frame: 1 year

The secondary safety endpoint will be rates of serious test-related complications*.

*Serious test-related complications will include contrast-induced nephropathy, hematoma requiring transfusion, arteriovenous fistula, aneurysm formation, retroperitoneal bleed, arterial dissection and any surgery for test-related complications and cumulative CAD test-related effective biological radiation dose.

1 year
Quality of Life
Time Frame: 1 year
The tertiary endpoint will be general and angina-specific quality of life, as measured by the EQ-5D Health Survey and Seattle Angina Questionnaire, respectively.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Dan Gebow, PhD, MDDX LLC
  • Principal Investigator: James Min, MD, Cornell Weill Medical College
  • Principal Investigator: Hyuk-Jae Chang, MD, Severance Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

March 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Cardiac CT

3
Subscribe