Emergency Department (ED)-Directed Interventions to Improve Asthma Outcomes

November 17, 2016 updated by: University of Alberta

Emergency Department (ED)-Directed Interventions to Improve Outcomes After Asthma Exacerbations

The purpose of this study is to determine if evidence-based guidance on follow-up care and self-management provided to PCPs and patients, respectively, reduces relapses within 90 days for acute asthma (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes will include follow-up visits with the primary care provider, patients' quality of life and cost-effectiveness indicators.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This prospective, randomized, open label study will include asthmatics 17-55 years of age with no evidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Patients will be eligible if they visit one of four Emergency Departments (EDs) in Edmonton or Calgary and receive treatment for acute asthma resulting in discharge home. All patients should have a primary care provider (PCP: Family Physician, Internist or Nurse Practitioner) with whom to follow-up or one will be found for them. At discharge patients will be randomized into three groups: A: Usual care; PCPs will receive a faxed copy of the ED chart and patients will receive a discharge plan and a paper-based educational pamphlet (treatment in the ED and at discharge will be left to ED physicians' discretion); B: Usual care + personalized fax to the patients' PCP including a copy of the ED chart and a opinion-leader (OL) letter encouraging follow-up within two weeks and providing management suggestions; or C: Usual care + personalized fax to the patients' PCP including the OL letter as described above + involvement of a case manager who will encourage patients' to pursue follow-up, provide management review and offer brief education within the next week. Outcomes will be ascertained blinded to treatment allocation through telephone follow-up at 30 and 90 days. A sample of 366 patients (122 per group) is required based on the proportion with relapse at 90 days (40%) and a chi-square test of association and post-hoc tests (groups A vs. B, groups B vs. C). This sample will allow for the detection of an moderate effect size of at least 0.171, and a difference between groups A and B of 50% (i.e., 40% vs. 20%) and between groups B and C of 75% (i.e., 20% vs. 5%) using two-sided z-tests, 80% power, α=0.025. Intention to treat analyses will be conducted. Relapse rates by group and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) will be calculated. Proportions among groups will be compared using chi-square tests and if statistically significant, separate proportion tests will compare pairs of groups adjusting for multiple testing. A multivariable logistic regression model will adjust effect estimates for potential baseline imbalances and site-specific differences in effectiveness.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

367

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada
        • University of Calgary
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G2B7
        • University of Alberta

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years to 55 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 17-55 years old;
  2. Patients treated and discharged from one of the four study sites with acute asthma (not simply for a prescription refill) during the study period;
  3. Patients must have had a previous physician-diagnosis of asthma and an exacerbation diagnosed by the ED physician (e.g., past asthma history, recorded response to β-agonists in the ED, and increased asthma symptoms). In the event of a new diagnosis, the patient is still eligible for the study if the treating physician feels that the history is compatible with a diagnosis of asthma;
  4. Patients must have evidence of airflow obstruction on presentation at the ED, defined as an FEV1 or PEF <80% of predicted;
  5. Patients must not have a history of more than 20 pack-years of smoking;
  6. All patients should have a PCP (FP, nurse practitioner or internist) with whom to follow-up or attempts will be made to find one for them.

Exclusion criteria:

These criteria ensure the exclusion of suspected COPD patients and patients who require different treatments:

  1. Patients with asthma who are primarily cared for by a Respirologist/Pulmonologist;
  2. Patients not seen by an emergency physician in the ED (e.g., direct referrals);
  3. Physician diagnosis of acute COPD (e.g., failure of FEV1 or PEF to respond to ED treatment and a FEV1/FVC ratio ≤ 70%);
  4. Radiologically confirmed pneumonia during the 10 days preceding trial entry;
  5. Patients with an active history of bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, or lung cancer;
  6. Clinically confirmed congestive heart failure at ED presentation;
  7. Patients not able/unwilling to perform spirometry assessment;
  8. Inability to provide informed consent or comply with the study protocol due to cognitive impairment, language barrier, or no contact details;
  9. Patient has previously participated in the study;
  10. Patients who in the opinion of the investigator are unsuitable for enrolment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control - usual care (UC)
Usual care after an ED visit for asthma will include the provision of discharge instructions/plan, and action plan, and verbal instructions for follow-up with their PCP, and a faxed copy of the ED chart to the patient's PCP.
Usual care provided to asthma patients when discharged from the ED
Experimental: Opinion leader (OL) guidance to patients' PCPs
In addition to UC, OL guidance will be provided to the patients' PCP. A letter signed by an influential, respected, and local clinical leader (Respirologist) will encourage follow-up within two weeks and provide management suggestions.
Usual care provided to asthma patients when discharged from the ED
The patients' PCP will be notified by fax about the ED visit and management. The Opinion Leader letter will contain a summary of the current asthma guidelines for ambulatory care (including: asthma education, long-term recommendations, smoking cessation, and action plan) signed by a local opinion leader. A review of the patient's management within a week of the ED visit will be recommended. The patient will also receive information regarding their acute exacerbation and will be told to review the current management of their disease with their PCP.
Experimental: Care manager education to patients
In addition to UC and OL guidance provided to the patients' PCP, care manager self-management education will be provided to patients. A care manager will encourage patients' to pursue follow-up, provide management review and offer brief education via telephone within a week of being discharged.
Usual care provided to asthma patients when discharged from the ED
The patients' PCP will be notified by fax about the ED visit and management. The Opinion Leader letter will contain a summary of the current asthma guidelines for ambulatory care (including: asthma education, long-term recommendations, smoking cessation, and action plan) signed by a local opinion leader. A review of the patient's management within a week of the ED visit will be recommended. The patient will also receive information regarding their acute exacerbation and will be told to review the current management of their disease with their PCP.
The involvement of a care manager will encourage patients' to pursue follow-up, provide management review and offer brief education via telephone within a week of being discharged

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relapses within 90 days after discharge
Time Frame: 90 days
Any unscheduled medical visit to a walk-in clinic, family doctor's office or an emergency department resulting from the patient's perceived need for further asthma treatment within 90 days after discharge.
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to relapse
Time Frame: 90 days
Time from Emergency Department (ED) discharge to first asthma relapse.
90 days
Primary care provider follow-up
Time Frame: 30 days
A patient having a face-to-face meeting with their PCP within 30 days after discharge. Telephone interactions with the office will be classified as "no PCP follow-up".
30 days
Health related quality of life (HRQoL)
Time Frame: Baseline, 30 and 90 days
A disease specific, validated instrument for asthma patients (AQLQ) will be used. We will also employ the EQ-5D.
Baseline, 30 and 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brian H Rowe, MD, MSc, University of Alberta
  • Principal Investigator: Cristina Villa-Roel, MD, MSc, University of Alberta
  • Principal Investigator: Eddy Lang, MD, University of Calgary
  • Principal Investigator: Mohit Bhutani, MD, University of Alberta
  • Principal Investigator: Bjug Borgundvaag, MD, University of Toronto
  • Principal Investigator: Sumit Majumdar, MD, MSc, University of Alberta
  • Principal Investigator: Christopher McCabe, PhD, University of Alberta
  • Principal Investigator: Rhonda Rosychuk, PhD, University of Alberta

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

March 2, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 21, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CIHR operating grant # 201109
  • CIHR Grant (Other Grant/Funding Number: CIHR 201109 Operating Grant (MOP 119354))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Asthma

Clinical Trials on Usual care

Subscribe