A Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of LUSEDRA (Fospropofol Disodium) as an Intravenous Sedative for Diagnostic or Therapeutic Colonoscopy in Adult Special Populations

February 6, 2013 updated by: Eisai Inc.

A Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of LUSEDRA (Fospropofol Disodium) as an Intravenous Sedative for Diagnostic or Therapeutic Colonoscopy in Adult Special Populations

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LUSEDRA (fospropofol disodium) and to determine whether a dose lower than currently approved can provide effective moderate sedation required to complete diagnostic or therapeutic procedures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This will be a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter, dose-ranging study, in age >/= 65 years, and/or weight < 60 kg, and/or American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Classification Status 3 or 4 subjects using either the approved dose modification or 1 lower dose, to achieve a moderate level of sedation required to complete the scheduled diagnostic or therapeutic procedure. Three subgroups of subjects will be included. For Subgroup 1 and Subgroup 2, approximately equal numbers of subjects will be enrolled into 2 strata: weight >/= 55 kg and weight < 55 kg. For Subgroup 1 and Subgroup 2, subjects will be randomly assigned to 1 of 2 dose groups in a 1:1 ratio within each stratum. For Subgroup 3, subjects will be randomly assigned to 1 of 2 dose groups in a 1:1 ratio.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

153

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85050
        • HOPE Research Institute
    • California
      • Baldwin Park, California, United States, 91706
        • Southern California Permanente Medical Group
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92114
        • Desta Digestive Disease Medical Center
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Washington Hospital Center
    • Florida
      • Maitland, Florida, United States, 32751
        • Center for Advanced Gastroenterology
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami School of Medicine
      • South Miami, Florida, United States, 33143
        • Miami Research Associates
      • Sunrise, Florida, United States, 33323
        • Sheridan Clinical Research
    • Georgia
      • Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30060
        • Gastrointestinal Specialists of Georgia, PC
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68131
        • Creighton University Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10075
        • Research Associates of New York, LLP
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University Medical Center Department of Anesthesiology
    • Pennsylvania
      • Tyrone, Pennsylvania, United States, 16686
        • Ilumina Clinical Associates, Keystone Headache and Pain Mgt Center, Tyrone Hospital
      • Uniontown, Pennsylvania, United States, 15401
        • Ilumina Clinical Associates
    • Texas
      • Plano, Texas, United States, 75075
        • Digestive Health Associates
      • Spring, Texas, United States, 77386
        • Clinical Trial Network
    • Utah
      • Clinton, Utah, United States, 84015
        • Utah Digestive Health Institute
      • Logan, Utah, United States, 84341-2534
        • Northern Utah Gastroenterology
      • Odgen, Utah, United States, 84405
        • Advance Clinical Research
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84107
        • Utah Clinical Trials, LLC
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22911
        • Charlottesville Medical Research
      • Fairfax, Virginia, United States, 22031
        • Gastroenterology Associates of Northern Virginia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Subjects who meet all of the following criteria will be included in the study:

  1. Male and female adult candidates for diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy with at least one of the following characteristics:

    • Subgroup 1: Weight < 60 kg and age >/= 18 to < 65 years and ASA I or II;
    • Subgroup 2: Weight < 60 kg and age >/= 65 years and/or ASA 3 or 4; or
    • Subgroup 3: Weight >/=60 kg and age >/= 65 years and/or ASA 3 or 4.
  2. Females of childbearing potential must have a negative beta human chorionic gonadotropin (?hCG) urine pregnancy test at Visit 1 (Screening) and prior to starting study drug (Visit 2). Female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to be abstinent or to use a highly effective methods of contraception (eg, condom + spermicide, condom + diaphragm with spermicide, intrauterine device [IUD], or have a vasectomised partner) having starting for at least 1 menstrual cycle prior to starting study drug and throughout the entire study period and for 30 days after the last dose of study drug. Those women using hormonal contraceptives must also be using an additional approved method of contraception (as described previously). Perimenopausal women must be amenorrheic for at least 12 months to be considered of non-childbearing potential;
  3. Are willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol; and
  4. Provide written informed consent.

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in the study:

  1. Females who are pregnant (positive BhCG urine pregnancy test) or breastfeeding;
  2. Subjects who do not meet nil per os (NPO) requirement of no solid foods within 8 hours and clear fluids up to 3 hours before the procedure (assessed only at Baseline);
  3. Evidence of clinically significant disease or a history of a concomitant medical condition (eg, cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, renal disease) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could affect the subject's safety or ability to safely complete the study;
  4. Subjects with hypersensitivity to LUSEDRA or any other components of LUSEDRA, including its active metabolite, propofol;
  5. History of drug or alcohol dependency or abuse within approximately the last 2 years; or
  6. The Investigator believes to be medically unfit to receive the study drug or unsuitable for any other reason.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: fospropofol disodium Subgroup 1 Lower Dose
Dose of Initial IV (Titration) Bolus 6.5mg/kg) (administered to Subgroup 1, Weight < 60 kg and Age < 65 years and ASAI and II)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: : fospropofol disodium Subgroup 1 Approved Dose
(Dose of Initial IV (Titration) Bolus 385mg) (Administered to Subgroup 1, Weight <60 kg and Age <65 years and ASAI and II)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: fospropofol disodium Subgroup 2 Lower Dose
Dose of Initial IV (Titration) Bolus 4.875 mg/kg) (administered to Subgroup 2, Weight < 60 kg and Age >/=65 years and ASA 3 or 4
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: fospropofol disodium Subgroup 2 Approved Dose
(Dose of Initial IV (Titration) Bolus 297.5mg) (Administered to Subgroup 2, Weight <60 kg and Age >/=65 years and ASA 3 or 4
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: fospropofol disodium Subgroup 3 Lower Dose
(Dose of Initial IV (Titration) Bolus 3.9mg/kg) (Administered to Subgroup 3, Weight >/= 60 kg and Age >/= 65 years and ASA 3 or 4
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: fospropofol disodium Subgroup 3 Approved Dose
Dose of Initial IV (Titration) Bolus 4.875 mg/kg) (Administered to Subgroup 3, Weight >/= 60 kg and Age >/= 65 years and ASA 3 or 4

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Sedation Success
Time Frame: Day 1
Sedation success was defined as subjects who met the following 4 criteria: had 3 consecutive Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scores at or less than 4 after administration of sedative medication, completed the procedure, did not require the use of alternative sedative medication, and did not require manual/mechanical ventilation. The MOAA/S score was used to clinically rate the level of sedation using a score of 0 to 5 based on the subject's level of responsiveness. A high score on the MOAA/S scale indicated a lower level of sedation.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment Success
Time Frame: Day 1
Treatment success was defined as subjects who met the following 3 criteria: completed the procedure, did not require the use of alternative sedative medication, and did not require manual/mechanical ventilation.
Day 1
Number of Participants With Modified Sedation Success
Time Frame: Day 1
Modified sedation success was defined as a subject who was a sedation success and did not have a MOAA/S score <2 any time after administration of sedative medication. Sedation success was defined as subjects who had 3 consecutive MOAA/S scores at or less than 4 after administration of sedative medication, completed the procedure, did not require the use of alternative sedative medication, and did not require manual/mechanical ventilation. The MOAA/S score was used to clinically rate the level of sedation using a score of 0 to 5 based on the level of responsiveness.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jim Ferry, Eisai Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 20, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 8, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sedation

Clinical Trials on fospropofol disodium Subgroup 1 Lower Dose

3
Subscribe