Botulinum A Toxin in the Treatment of Patients With Painful Bladder Syndrome

April 19, 2011 updated by: University Of Perugia

Botulinum A Toxin Intravesical Injections Versus Bladder Overdistension in the Treatment of Patients With Painful Bladder Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Study

Previous clinical observations showed that Botulinum A toxin (BoNT/A) has also an antinociceptive effect and can control the neuropathic pain.

In the urologic field, recent in in vitro and in in vivo studies demonstrated that the neurotoxin is able to inhibit the release of several neurotransmitters from the bladder afferent fibers and urothelium. These neurotrasmitters as SP, CGRP, ATP, NGF and Prostaglandins are involved in neurogenic inflammation. Thus, it is reasonable to hypothesize that patients with affected by painful bladder syndrome (PBS) could benefit from BoNT/A intravesically administered.

The aim of the study is to investigate the clinical and urodynamic effects of an intravesical treatment with BoNT/A in patients affected by PBS associated with increased urinary frequency, who are refractory to conventional treatments. This treatment will be compared to bladder over distention, which is considered a conventional therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients with refractory PBS will be prospectively enrolled in the study. Baseline evaluation: Clinical evaluation with visual analog scale (VAS) for pain quantification; QoL assessment with a standardized questionnaire, HAM-A and HAM-D scales for the evaluation of anxiety and depression; voiding diary with the recording of diurnal and nocturnal urinary frequency; urodynamic evaluation, 1 month before commencing the study.

Treatment: According to a computerized randomization, patients will receive: A) one single injection of BoNT/A, 100 U diluted in 10 ml normal saline into the bladder, under cystoscopic guidance, under local anesthesia ; or B) one single bladder overdistension under local anesthesia. C) one single injection of placebo (NACL 0.9 % 10 ml) under local anesthesia.

Follow up: clinical evaluation (VAS, HAM-A and HAM-D, QOL assessment, voiding diary) and urodynamics three months after treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Perugia, Italy, 16100
        • University Of Perugia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • refractory bladder pain, the urgency-frequency syndrome, and sterile urine

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neurological diseases
  • pregnancy and concomitant use of aminoglycosides and anticoagulants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
One single injection of placebo
Other Names:
  • One single injection of placebo
Active Comparator: Botulinum A toxin
Botulinum A toxin intravesical injection.
One treatment, 100 U vials diluted in 10 ml normal saline
Other Names:
  • Allergan
Sham Comparator: Bladder overdistension
Standard treatment: bladder overdistension
Bladder overdistension

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Clinical efficacy: reduction in pain and diurnal and nocturnal urinary frequency; improvement in QOL; improvement in HAM-A and HAM-D scores.
Time Frame: PAIN quantification with 3 months follow up
PAIN quantification with 3 months follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Urodynamic assessment
Time Frame: 3 months follow up
3 months follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2011

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

July 7, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 20, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2011

Last Verified

December 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Painful Bladder Syndrome (PBS)

Clinical Trials on Intravesical injection of Botulinum A Toxin

3
Subscribe