Identifying Predictors of Treatment Success in Painful Bladder Syndrome (PBS)

August 4, 2011 updated by: Rambam Health Care Campus

Prospective Observational Study That Evaluates Predictor Tests for the Success of Myofascial Pelvic Floor Muscles for the Treatment of PBS

Study aims to: (1) evaluate the role of morphological and physiological characteristics of the pelvic floor, pain-related psychological and -psychophysical variables in prediction of the success of myofascial physical therapy (MPT) for the treatment of painful bladder syndrome Patients with clinical symptoms of PBS will undergo physical examination, sensory testing in the genital area, perineal ultrasound examination for the evaluation of the length of the levator muscles before MPT and following 10 consecutive sessions of MPT.

Improvement in clinical symptoms will be assessed and evaluated for correlations with psychophysical examinations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is highly prevalent, yet its etiology and the treatment approach are not clear. Painful bladder syndrome (PBS), a subtype of CPPS, is commonly treated by Myofascial physical therapy (MPT), however its efficiency is limited to portion of patients. The relative contribution of local factors such as pelvic anatomical and physiological function compared with systemic pain- related psychological and psychophysical parameters in the prediction of MPT outcome has not been illumined yet.

Hypothesis and aims: Assuming that MPT has mainly local effect its treatment success can be predicted by local impairment of pelvic anatomical and physiological function assessed pretreatment.

Study aims to: (1) evaluate the role of morphological and physiological characteristics of the pelvic floor, pain-related psychological and -psychophysical variables in prediction of MPT success, (2) to assess the effect of MPT on these parameters.

Methods: PBS patients will be evaluated for symptoms severity prior to MPT by: (1) pelvic physical examination for identification of trigger points, (2) self-report of pelvic pain intensity on visual analogue scale (VAS), (3) filling a questionnaire for urinary urgency symptoms, (4) evaluation of morphological and physiological characters of pelvic muscles floor by ultrasound and Doppler, respectively, (5) assessment of pain-related psychological variables (depression, somatization and pain catastrophizing) by questionnaires, and (6) psychophysical tests of experimental pain perception. Following 3 months treatment of MPT, patients will be reevaluated for the same tests. Treatment success will be determined by 30% reduction in pain and urinary urgency.

Expected results: Patients with shorter levator muscles and reduced blood flow in the pelvic region will benefit from MPT compared to patients with augmented pain sensitivity and higher depression, pain catastrophizing and somatization scores. MPT will elongate levator muscles and increased blood flow to the pelvic region that will be associated with the improvement in PBS symptoms.

Importance: The significance of the proposed study stems from its potential to extend conceptualizing of mechanisms associated with PBS and its treatment success.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

35

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Haifa, Israel, 34987
        • Zvolon Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with clinical diagnosis of painful bladder syndrome

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age > 18 years old
  2. urinary frequency of at least 10 per 24 hr including one nighttime voiding
  3. complaints of bladder pain that has been present for at least 3 months
  4. pain intensity rated at least four on a VAS from 0 ''no pain at all'' to 10 ''worst imaginable pain'' during the previous month
  5. pelvic digital exam reveals at least three different TrPs in the levator ani muscles that are verbally confirmed.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. history of pelvic cancer or radiation
  2. pelvic or abdominal surgery within 3 months
  3. urinary tract infection within the last month
  4. diagnosis of fibromyalgia or irritable bowel disease
  5. diagnosis of neurologic disorder; diabetes; pregnancy;
  6. pelvic pain and/ or urgency symptoms presented only during menses.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with painful bladder syndrome
Patients with diagnosis of PBS Will be offered to take part in the following study.
Mechanical pain threshold: Threshold will be assessed, by using the von Frey filaments. The lowest gram weight capable of inducing pain in two of three trials will be considered as a pain threshold Heat pain threshold (HPT): HPT will be measured using thermal sensory analyzer
Other Names:
  • TSA, Medoc Ramat Yishay, Israel
Morphological measures of the pelvic muscles: Using a 3D 4-8MHz abdominal probe ultrasound testing will be performed. The following parameters will be measured: (1) anteroposterior hiatal diameter; (2) lateral hiatal diameter; (3) levator ani thickness and length at 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock; (4) length of the obturator (5) length of the pubococcygeus muscle; (6) obturator thickness.
Other Names:
  • Voluson 730 Expert; GE Healthcare

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction of pain level
Time Frame: 3 months
Following MPT it is expected that patients PBS symptoms will be improved as will be evaluated by VAS.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Elongation of levator ani muscles.
Time Frame: 3 months
Following MPT treatment it is expected that the levator ani muscles will be elongated as will be measured by perineal US.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Lior Lowenstein, MD, Rambam Health Care Campus

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 5, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 5, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2011

Last Verified

August 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RMV-0232-10
  • RMB-0232-10 (OTHER: Helsinki)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Painful Bladder Syndrome

Clinical Trials on quantitive sensory testing

3
Subscribe