Efficiency Evaluation of Intradiploic Intra-osseus Anesthesia Versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

August 28, 2014 updated by: Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille

Management of dental pain emergencies is a challenge for the clinician, particularly when pain is due to endodontic infection.

Tested hypothesis is intradiploic anesthesia is more effective and quicker than inferior alveolar nerve block for mandibular molars anesthesia.

The aim of the study is the evaluation of Quicksleeper efficiency used in first intention versus inferior alveolar nerve block used in most current dental treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Management of dental pain emergencies is a challenge for the clinician, particularly when pain is due to endodontic infection. Failure rate of local anesthesia highly increases with irreversible pulpitis or inflamed periradicular tissue.

Tested hypothesis is intradiploic anesthesia is more effective and quicker than inferior alveolar nerve block for mandibular molars anesthesia (from teeth 35 up to 38 and from 45 up to 48).

The primary aim of the study is the evaluation of Quicksleeper efficiency used in first intention versus inferior alveolar nerve block used in most current dental treatment.

Four clinical situations are evaluated : pulpitis; periapical abcess; pulpal hyperemia; asymptomatic decayed tooth.

Evaluated parameters are : speed of sedation, ability of cure, additional anesthesia needed, total of needles and cartridges used, side effects. Time and validation of complete anesthesia is controlled by pulp tester.

Studied population is patients cared in restorative, endodontics department.

Pulpal and periapical molar and premolar sedation is randomly managed by inferior alveolar nerve block or Quicksleeper intraosseous anesthesia, among studied population (divided in 2 groups of 50 patients). Pulp-tester measures anesthesia minute by minute.

The comparison of study results to bibliography, guidelines and advantages for using mechanical Quicksleeper anesthesia system will be discussed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France
        • Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Marseille

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Irreversible pulpitis on second mandibular premolar or mandibular molars
  • Necessity of pulpotomy or pulpectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy, chest feeding
  • Non dental emergency state
  • hypersensibility to local anesthesia
  • Pheochromocytoma
  • Irregularity of cardiac rhythm
  • Myocardial infarct in the 6 previous months
  • Hepatic porphyria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Quicksleeper intraosseous anesthesia
Pulpal and periapical molar and premolar sedation is managed by Quicksleeper intraosseous anesthesia.
Pulpal and periapical molar and premolar sedation is randomly managed among studied population and Pulp-tester measures anesthesia minute by minute.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Inferior alveolar nerve block
Pulpal and periapical molar and premolar sedation is managed by inferior alveolar nerve block.
Pulpal and periapical molar and premolar sedation is randomly managed among studied population and Pulp-tester measures anesthesia minute by minute.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To evaluate the Quicksleeper efficiency used in first intention versus inferior alveolar nerve block used in most current dental treatment.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Herve TASSERY, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 9, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 29, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2014

Last Verified

August 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Pain

Clinical Trials on Dental anesthesia

3
Subscribe