Mapracorat Ophthalmic Suspension for the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery

August 18, 2020 updated by: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Mapracorat Ophthalmic Suspension, 3% in Subjects for the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery

The objective of this clinical study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Mapracorat Ophthalmic Suspension, 3% to vehicle for the treatment of postoperative inflammation and pain following cataract surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

311

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14609
        • Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who are candidates for routine, uncomplicated cataract surgery
  • Participants who, in the Investigator's opinion, have potential postoperative pinhole Snellen visual acuity (VA) of at least 20/200 in the study eye.
  • Participants must be willing to wait to undergo cataract surgery on the fellow eye until after the study has been completed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who are expected to require concurrent ocular therapy (either eye) with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), mast cell stabilizers, antihistamines, or decongestants.
  • Participants who are expected to require treatment with any systemic or ocular (either eye) corticosteroids or glucocorticoids.
  • Participants who are expected to require concurrent ocular therapy with immunosuppressants (eg, Restasis).
  • Participants who have known hypersensitivity or contraindication to the study drug(s) or their components.
  • Participants participating in any drug or device clinical investigation within 30 days prior to entry into this study and/or during the period of study participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle
Vehicle of mapracorat ophthalmic suspension
Instill study medication into the study eye per dosing instructions for 14 days
Experimental: Mapracorat
Ophthalmic suspension 3%
Instill study medication into study eye per dosing instructions for 14 days
Other Names:
  • BOL-303242-X

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Cells.
Time Frame: 8 days
Anterior chamber (AC) cells were assessed using a 0 to 4 grading scale by an ophthalmologist using slip lamp biomicroscopy. A slit lamp examination of the lids, conjunctiva, limbus, cornea, anterior chamber, vitreous, and lens was performed without pupil dilation. Accumulation of white blood cells in aqueous was assessed. The grades were defined as: 0 = No cells seen; 1 = 1 - 5 cells; 2 = 6 - 15 cells; 3 = 16 - 30 cells; 4 = >30 cells. Complete resolution of AC cells was defined as Grade 0.
8 days
Percentage of Participants With Grade 0 Pain
Time Frame: 8 days
Ocular pain was defined as a positive sensation of the eye, including foreign body sensation, stabbing, throbbing, or aching. The scores ranged from 0=None to 5=Severe, were higher scores indicated worse pain.
8 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Anterior Chamber (AC) Flare.
Time Frame: 8 days
A slit lamp examination of the lids, conjunctiva, limbus, cornea, anterior chamber, vitreous, and lens will be performed without pupil dilation. Scattering of a slit lamp light beam when directed into the anterior chamber (Tyndall effect). The grades for flare were 0=None to 4=Very Severe effect.
8 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Rabia Ozden, MD, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

October 28, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 663

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on Mapracorat

3
Subscribe