- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01236521
Care Management for the Effective Use of Opioids (CAMEO)
Care Management for the Effective Use of Opioids (CAMEO)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The general purpose of the CAre Management for the Effective use of Opioids (CAMEO) study is to develop, test, and implement novel treatments and care delivery models that address barriers to effective pain management and that can be practicably applied in VA primary care settings for chronic low back pain (CLBP). The CAMEO trial is a 2-arm randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of pharmacological vs. behavioral approaches for CLBP.
The investigators' study sample will target 272 Veterans with moderate to severe CLBP despite long-term opioid therapy. Patients from five primary care clinics at the Roudebush VA Medical Center and two community based outpatient clinics will be recruited to participate in CAMEO and randomized to one of two treatment arms. The pharmacological arm will involve guideline-concordant opioid management coupled with algorithm-based co-analgesic treatment (MED). Patients in the behavioral arm (CBT) will receive pain self-management/coping skills training. The trial will last 12-months and all participants will undergo comprehensive outcome assessments at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Study Aims: Among Veterans with chronic low back pain refractory to long-term opioid therapy
- To compare the interventions' (MED vs. CBT) effects on pain intensity and function over 12 months
To compare the interventions' effects (MED vs. CBT) on other relevant outcomes
- Health-related quality of life
- Pain Catastrophizing
- Depression
- Anxiety
- Disability
- Opioid misuse and opioid dose
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202-2884
- Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Veterans will be eligible if they have:
- chronic lower back pain of at least moderate intensity
- pain for 6 months
- on chronic opioid therapy
- and access to a working telephone
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria includes:
- severe medical conditions
- active psychosis
- schizophrenia
- active suicidal ideation
- pending back surgery
- moderately severe cognitive impairment
- involvement in ongoing pain trials
- and pregnant or trying to become pregnant
The investigators will exclude Veterans with an active substance use disorder (i.e., those currently in treatment), but to maximize generalizability the investigators will not exclude those with a past history of substance abuse.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm 1: Pharmacological (MED)
Subjects in the Pharmacological (MED) arm will receive at least 8 contacts with the nurse care managers (NCM) over the trial period.
Participants will have an initial visit at baseline to assess their current and past treatments for chronic lower back pain, pain intensity, and pain-related limitations.
Patients' opioids will be adjusted and/or co-analgesics (or adjuvants) will be initiated.
During follow-up calls, patients' pain severity, response to treatment, adherence, adverse effects, and desire to change current treatment will be assessed.
Follow-up NCM telephone contacts will occur at 2 and 4 weeks after baseline, and months 2, 3, 4, 6, and 9 months.
On average, these calls last between 10 to 20 minutes.
Detailed logs will be kept of the timing and content of patient contacts.
|
During the baseline assessment, the nurse care managers will determine current and past treatments for chronic lower back pain and establish whether or not patients have had an adequate trial (i.e., were analgesics sufficiently dosed). If not, the nurse care manager in conjunction with study doctors will recommend an adjustment of the patients' opioid or initiate treatment with a co-analgesic with appropriate dosing and scheduling. The Patients in the MED arm will be asked to sign an opioid treatment agreement at enrollment.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Arm 2: Behavioral treatment (CBT)
Veterans randomized to behavioral treatment arm (CBT) will receive a series of 8 pain self-management/coping skills training sessions delivered by one of three primary-care based clinical psychologists.
Since optimal application of non-pharmacological interventions for pain involves tailoring to patient needs, participants will be introduced to a menu of self-management and coping skills rather than receive a prescribed program.
Delivery of the behavioral intervention will employ a flexible approach that is easily adapted to individual preferences and perceived need for learning specific pain coping skills.
Tailoring will include the selection of relevant content and skills and assessment of readiness to change behaviors.
|
There will be 8 sessions of pain self-management and coping skills.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Brief Pain Inventory Total Score at Baseline and Change Score From Baseline at 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
|
The Brief Pain Inventory Total Score combines scores from the BPI Pain Intensity subscale and the BPI Pain Interference subscale.
This scale provides a total score from 0 (no pain/no pain interference) to 10 (worst pain imaginable/completely interferes).
We report below the baseline score on the 0 to 10 scale.
At each follow-up time point (3, 6, 9, and 12 months) we report the change from baseline to follow-up.
This value was calculated as the baseline score minus the follow-up score.
|
Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
|
|
Brief Pain Inventory Pain Intensity Score at Baseline and Each Follow-up Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
|
The Brief Pain Inventory pain intensity score is scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
We report below the baseline score on the 0 to 10 scale.
At each follow-up time point (3, 6, 9, and 12 months) we report the change from baseline to follow-up.
This value was calculated as the baseline score minus the follow-up score.
|
Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
|
|
Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference Scale Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
|
The Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference Scale score assesses if pain interferes with 7 common activities.
This scale is score 0 (no interference) to 10 (high interference).
The 7-items are averaged to give a score.
|
Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
|
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale a 13-item scale that assesses catastrophizing - a pain belief that have been found to be strong predictor of poor treatment response.
It is scored from 0 (no catastrophizing) to 52 (severe catastrophizing)
|
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
|
|
Roland Morris Disability Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
|
The Roland Morris Disability Scale is a 24-item pain-specific measure of physical disability.
It provides a score from 0 (no disability) to 24 (high disability)
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
|
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 is used to assess depression severity.
It's 9-items that are scored from 0 (no depression) to 27 (severe depression)
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
|
|
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
|
The GAD-7 is a measure of anxiety.
The GAD-7 consists of 7 items that are scored from 0 (no anxiety) to 21 (severe anxiety)
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
|
|
AUDIT-C
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
|
The AUDIT-C is validated as an effective screening test and diagnostic tool for alcohol misuse in primary care samples.
It is scored on 0 to 10 score with higher scores representing alcohol misuse
|
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
|
|
Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
|
The COMM (Current Opioid Misuse Measure) is a 17-item instrument designed to monitor misuse and aberrant behaviors in patients prescribed opioids.
The scale is scored from 0 (no evidence of opioid misuse or aberrant behaviors) to 64 (strong evidence for opioid misuse and aberrant behaviors)
|
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
|
|
SF-36 General Health Perception
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
|
The SF-36 is a subscale that assesses the self-reported general health.
It is scored on a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores representing greater perceived general health
|
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
|
|
SF-36 Vitality Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
|
The SF-36 vital score is a subscale that assesses participants' vitality/energy.
It is scored on a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores representing greater vitality/energy.
|
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
|
|
SF-36 Social Functioning Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
|
The SF-36 social functioning scale is a subscale that assesses the self-reported social functioning.
It is scored on a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores representing better social functioning.
|
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Matthew J. Bair, MD MS, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chen CX, Kroenke K, Stump TE, Kean J, Carpenter JS, Krebs EE, Bair MJ, Damush TM, Monahan PO. Estimating minimally important differences for the PROMIS pain interference scales: results from 3 randomized clinical trials. Pain. 2018 Apr;159(4):775-782. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001121.
- Chen CX, Kroenke K, Stump T, Kean J, Krebs EE, Bair MJ, Damush T, Monahan PO. Comparative Responsiveness of the PROMIS Pain Interference Short Forms With Legacy Pain Measures: Results From Three Randomized Clinical Trials. J Pain. 2019 Jun;20(6):664-675. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
- Bair MJ, Outcalt SD, Slaven JE, Kroenke K, Kempf C, Zillich AJ, Damush TM, Saha C, French DD, Krebs EE. Care Management for the Effective Use of Opioids (CAMEO): A Randomized Trial. Abstracts of the 77th Annual Scientific Meeting, March 6-9, 2019. Vancouver, BC, Canada. Abstract 1734. [Abstract]. Psychosomatic medicine. 2019 May 1; 81(4):A-149.
- Kroenke K, Stump TE, Chen CX, Kean J, Bair MJ, Damush TM, Krebs EE, Monahan PO. Minimally important differences and severity thresholds are estimated for the PROMIS depression scales from three randomized clinical trials. J Affect Disord. 2020 Apr 1;266:100-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.101. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
- Kroenke K, Stump TE, Chen CX, Kean J, Damush TM, Bair MJ, Krebs EE, Monahan PO. Responsiveness of PROMIS and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) Depression Scales in three clinical trials. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Feb 4;19(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01674-3.
- Kroenke K, Stump TE, Kean J, Krebs EE, Damush TM, Bair MJ, Monahan PO. Diagnostic operating characteristics of PROMIS scales in screening for depression. J Psychosom Res. 2021 Aug;147:110532. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110532. Epub 2021 May 25.
- Bushey MA, Slaven J, Outcalt SD, Kroenke K, Kempf C, Froman A, Sargent C, Baecher B, Zillich A, Damush TM, Saha C, French DD, Bair MJ. Design and methods of the Care Management for the Effective Use of Opioids (CAMEO) trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jul;106:106456. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106456. Epub 2021 May 25.
- Bushey MA, Slaven JE, Outcalt SD, Kroenke K, Kempf C, Froman A, Sargent C, Baecher B, Zillich AJ, Damush TM, Saha C, French DD, Bair MJ. Effect of Medication Optimization vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Among US Veterans With Chronic Low Back Pain Receiving Long-term Opioid Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2242533. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42533.
- Midboe AM, Lewis ET, Paik MC, Gallagher RM, Rosenberg JM, Goodman F, Kerns RD, Becker WC, Trafton JA. Measurement of adherence to clinical practice guidelines for opioid therapy for chronic pain. Transl Behav Med. 2012 Mar;2(1):57-64. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0104-5.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IIR 10-128
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
Flowonix MedicalApproved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
Universitat Jaume ICompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | OncologySpain
-
Boston Scientific CorporationRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Leg Pain | Intractable Pain | Chronic Leg PainUnited States
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinZealand University Hospital; European Regional Development Fund; Design School...CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, CancerGermany
-
University of Campinas, BrazilCompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
-
noiVita SrlsUniversity of Eastern PiedmontCompletedCervical Pain | Pain Management | Lumbar Pain | Muscular | Chronic Pain (Back / Neck)Italy
-
Qi's ClinicNot yet recruitingNon-Cancer Pain,Musculoskeletal Pain,Chronic Pain,Acute Pain
-
Chinese University of Hong KongNot yet recruitingPain, Acute | Chronic Post Operative Pain | Pain, ChronicHong Kong
-
University of SaskatchewanRoyal University Hospital FoundationCompletedPain | Pain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain, IntractableCanada
-
Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.Completed
Clinical Trials on Pharmacological (MED)
-
USDA Beltsville Human Nutrition Research CenterPenn State UniversityCompletedHealthy VolunteersUnited States
-
Rambam Health Care CampusCompleted
-
Pulse TherapeuticsSuspendedCerebrovascular Disorders | Neurologic Disorder | Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Intracranial Embolism and Thrombosis | Strokes ThromboticUnited Kingdom
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCenters for Disease Control and PreventionCompleted
-
USDA Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research CenterEgg Nutrition CenterTerminated
-
South Eastern Health and Social Care TrustCompletedChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseUnited Kingdom
-
Queen's University, BelfastWellcome TrustCompletedSubjective Cognitive ImpairmentUnited Kingdom
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Recruiting
-
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung UniversityCompletedMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) | Oral Health | Mediterranean DietTaiwan
-
cortEXplore GmbHRaffeiner GmbHCompleted