Study of Regorafenib as a 3rd-line or Beyond Treatment for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) (GRID)

January 27, 2021 updated by: Bayer

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study of Regorafenib Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care for Subjects With Metastatic and/or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) Whose Disease Has Progressed Despite Prior Treatment With at Least Imatinib and Sunitinib

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of regorafenib plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for subjects with metastatic and/or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) whose disease has progressed despite prior treatment with at least imatinib and sunitinib.

The study is composed of 3 periods: A Screening Period, a Treatment Period, and a Survival Follow up Period.

Subjects randomized to be treated with regorafenib will receive 160 mg po od for 3 weeks of every 4 week (28 day) cycle (ie, 3 weeks on/1 week off). In addition subjects will receive best supportive care which excludes any disease specific anti cancer therapy such as any kinase inhibitor, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or surgery.

Tumor assessment will be every 4 weeks for the first 3 months, every 6 weeks for the next 3 months (through month 6), and every 8 weeks until the end of treatment, or more frequently if clinically indicated. Tumor assessments include CT or MRI and will be performed until tumor progression is seen in a central radiology review.

Subjects receiving placebo who experience disease progression may be offered active treatment.

Subjects who experience progression during regorafenib treatment may continue open label treatment.

All subjects will enter the Survival Follow-up Period upon discontinuation of randomized study treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

199

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Innsbruck, Austria, 6020
      • Wien, Austria, 1090
    • Steiermark
      • Graz, Steiermark, Austria, 8036
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 1Z2
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4L6
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X5
      • Beijing, China, 100071
      • Shanghai, China, 200030
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210002
      • Helsinki, Finland, 00290
      • Bordeaux Cedex, France, 33076
      • Lille Cedex, France, 59020
      • Lyon Cedex 08, France, 69373
      • Villejuif, France, 94805
    • Baden-Württemberg
      • Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 68167
      • Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 72076
    • Brandenburg
      • Bad Saarow, Brandenburg, Germany, 15526
    • Niedersachsen
      • Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany, 30625
    • Nordrhein-Westfalen
      • Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 40479
      • Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 45122
      • Köln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 50924
      • Tel Aviv, Israel, 64239
    • Emilia-Romagna
      • Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy, 40138
    • Lombardia
      • Milano, Lombardia, Italy, 20133
    • Piemonte
      • Torino, Piemonte, Italy, 10060
    • Sicilia
      • Palermo, Sicilia, Italy, 90127
      • Niigata, Japan, 951-8520
      • Osaka, Japan, 543-0035
    • Aichi
      • Nagoya, Aichi, Japan, 466-8650
    • Chiba
      • Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan, 277-8577
    • Hokkaido
      • Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, 060-8648
    • Tokyo
      • Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 104-0045
      • Busan, Korea, Republic of, 49201
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 138-736
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03080
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 06351
    • Gyeonggido
      • Goyang-si, Gyeonggido, Korea, Republic of, 410-769
      • Leiden, Netherlands, 2333 ZA
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6525 GA
      • Warszawa, Poland, 02-781
      • Singapore, Singapore, 169610
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
    • Barcelona
      • L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, 08907
      • London, United Kingdom, SW3 6JJ
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M20 4BX
    • Leicestershire
      • Leicester, Leicestershire, United Kingdom, LE1 5WW
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85258
    • Illinois
      • Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60201
      • Skokie, Illinois, United States, 60076
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239-2964
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19111-2497
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female subjects 18 years of age.
  • Subjects with histologically confirmed metastatic and/or unresectable GIST.
  • At least imatinib and sunitinib as prior treatment regimens, with objective disease progression or intolerance to imatinib, as well as disease progression while on sunitinib therapy. Additionally, disease progression or intolerance to other systemic therapies, as well as investigational new agents, is allowed, except prior treatment with any other vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor.
  • Subjects must have at least one measurable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1. A lesion in a previously irradiated area is eligible to be considered as measurable disease as long as there is objective evidence of progression of the lesion prior to study enrollment.

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1.

  • Adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function as assessed by laboratory parameters.

Recovery to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grade 0 or 1 level or recovery to baseline preceding the prior treatment from any previous drug/procedure-related toxicity (except alopecia and anemia).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days before start of study medication.
  • Congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2.
  • Unstable angina (angina symptoms at rest, new-onset angina, ie, within the last 3 months) or myocardial infarction (MI) within the past 6 months before start of study medication.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure 140 mmHg or diastolic pressure 90 mmHg despite optimal medical management).

Arterial thrombotic or embolic events such as cerebrovascular accident (including transient ischemic attacks), or pulmonary embolism within the 6 months before start of study drug or venous thrombotic events such as deep vein thrombosis within the 3 months before start of study drug.

  • Ongoing infection grade 2 National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.0.

Symptomatic metastatic brain or meningeal tumors.

  • Subjects with evidence or history of bleeding diathesis. Any hemorrhage or bleeding event NCI-CTCAE version 4.0 grade 3 or higher within 4 weeks prior to the start of study drug.

Non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture.

  • Persistent proteinuria of NCI-CTCAE version 4.0 grade 3 or higher (3.5 g/24 hrs, measured by urine protein:creatinine ratio on a random urine sample).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)
Participants received Regorafenib (Stivarga) 160 mg (4 x 40 mg tablets) per os once daily, 3 weeks on therapy followed by 1 week off therapy to comprise a cycle of 4 weeks
160 mg po once daily (od), 3 weeks on/1 week off. Route of administration: oral
Best supportive care includes any method to preserve the comfort and dignity of the patients, and excludes any disease-specific anti-neoplastic therapy such as any kinase inhibitor, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or surgical intervention.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants received matching Placebo tablets per os once daily, 3 weeks on therapy followed by 1 week off therapy to comprise a cycle of 4 weeks
Best supportive care includes any method to preserve the comfort and dignity of the patients, and excludes any disease-specific anti-neoplastic therapy such as any kinase inhibitor, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or surgical intervention.
once daily (od), 3 weeks on/1 week off. Route of administration: oral

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free Survival
Time Frame: From randomization of the first subject until approximately 144 progression-free survival events had occurred (study duration approximately one year)
Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to radiological disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was based on central radiological assessment using modified RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) v.1.1. Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions; or appearance of new lesions. Subjects without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Results are based on central evaluation.
From randomization of the first subject until approximately 144 progression-free survival events had occurred (study duration approximately one year)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (08 Jun 2015)
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. Subjects still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their date of last contact. Median OS was not observed at the time of PFS analysis and first analysis of OS, therefore only the proportion of death events was reported in the results posting system. This approach was maintained for the subsequent updates in the results posting system.
From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (08 Jun 2015)
Time to Progression (TTP)
Time Frame: From randomization of the first subject until until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 year
Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression (based on central radiological assessment using modified RECIST [Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors] v.1.1). Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study; or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions; or appearance of new lesions. Subjects without progression at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Results are based on central evaluation.
From randomization of the first subject until until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 year
Tumor Response
Time Frame: From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 year
Tumor Response of a subject was defined as the best tumor response (Complete Response [CR: disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumor (both target and non-target).], Partial Response [PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.], Stable Disease [SD: steady state of disease. Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.], or Progressive Disease [PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or appearance of new lesions.]) observed during the trial period and assessed according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. Results are based on central evaluation.
From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 year
Objective Response Rate
Time Frame: From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 year.
Objective response rate was defined as the percentage of subjects whose best response was Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumor (both target and non-target).) or Partial Response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). Results are based on central evaluation.
From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 year.
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 year
Disease Control Rate (DCR) was defined as the percentage of subjects whose best response was Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumor (both target and non-target).), Partial Response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.), or Stable Disease (SD: steady state of disease. Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.) according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. SD had to be maintained for at least 12 weeks from the first demonstration of that rating. Results are based on central evaluation.
From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 year
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 year
Duration of Response was defined as the time from date of first response (Complete Response [CR: disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumor (both target and non-target).] or Partial Response [PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum, no unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, and no appearance of new lesions.]) to the date when Progressive Disease (PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions, or appearance of new lesions.) is first documented, or to the date of death, whichever occurs first, according to RECIST v1.1. Subjects still having CR or PR and have not died at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Duration of response defined for responders only, i.e CR or PR. Results are based on central evaluation.
From randomization of the first subject until date of database cutoff (26 Jan 2012); study duration approximately 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 26, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

January 7, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Clinical Trials on Regorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506)

Subscribe