Comparative Study of Non-enhanced Versus Contrast Enhanced MR Angiography in Peripheral Arterial Disease on a 3T MR Scanner. (AngioIRMNative)

February 10, 2012 updated by: Rennes University Hospital

Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) of the peripheral arteries has become essential in the diagnosis and follow-up of peripheral arterial disease.

In clinical routine, the acquisition uses intravenous injection of a Gadolinium based contrast agent (gadolinium chelates).

Initially, contrast enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) was recommended for diabetic patients, elderly patients and\or patients with chronic renal insufficiency presenting a contraindication to CT angiography using iodized contrast agent injection.

However, the increase in nephrogenic systematic fibrosis clinical cases, which would be secondary to gadolinium chelates injection, in patients with chronic renal insufficiency has restricted the use of CE-MRA. More than 500 cases were described to date in the world.

Its occurrence is currently estimated around 4 % for patients in terminal chronic renal insufficiency and its mortality around 30 %.

According to the recommendations of AFSSAPS from August, 2007, two gadolinium contrast agents (Gadodiamide-OMNISCAN *, General Electric HealthCare and Gadopentetate Dimeglumine-MAGNEVIST *, Bayer HealthCare) are contraindicated if the glomerular filtration rate is lower than 30 ml/mn.

Non-contrast enhanced MR angiography (NCE MRA) techniques have been proposed to provide complete and non-invasive investigation of the peripheral vasculature, from the abdominal aorta to the calf, thus offering patients with chronic renal insufficiency a surrogate with no side effects.

Moreover, the use of high field (3T) MR imaging and phased array coils offers high quality images and good signal to noise ratio for peripheral vasculature analysis.

Besides, the acquisition can be repeated if required as it does not require any contrast injection.

The main objective is to evaluate the quality of the NCE images obtained for every investigated station from the abdominal aorta to the calf.

The secondary objective is to compare the diagnostic performances of NCE images with those of CE MRA.

The third objective is to estimate the contribution of automated and dedicated post-processing tools in optimizing the diagnostic quality of the images.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

20 patients will be recruited either by the vascular surgery or by the cardiology departments The appointment for MRA of the peripheral arteries on the Siemens 3T MR Scanner will be given as usual.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rennes, France, 35000
        • Rennes University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patient known or clinically suspected to present a peripheral arterial disease

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any adult patient known or clinically suspected to present a peripheral arterial disease, the assessment of which requires an MRA of the peripheral arteries.
  • MRA will be prescribed by the vascular surgery or cardiology departments. The patient should be conscious and cooperative. Clear and intelligible oral and written information will be given to the patient. The patients giving written informed consent will be included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A contraindication to MRI, in particular pacemakers or implantable defibrillators, cochlear implants, neurosurgical clips, intra-orbital or brain metallic foreign bodies, endo prothesis since less than 4 weeks or osteosynthesis material since less than 6 weeks
  • Contraindication to the injection of contrast agent: pregnancy, lactation, history of allergic reaction to contrast agent injection.
  • Hemodynamically unstability, acute respiratory failure, a precarious condition or a need for continuous monitoring incompatible with the constraints of MR imaging.
  • Age under 18 or under legal protection measure or without social coverage.
  • A refusal or inability of obtaining informed consent from the patient.

Patients withdrawing their informed consent will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Peripheral arterial disease

Each patient will receive on the same day:

  • NCE MRA
  • CE MRA usually performed in the clinical routine

After each MRA examination, the CE images will be interpreted by a radiologist and the report transmitted to the prescriber within the usual delay. The radiologists in charge of this interpretation will not be involved in the evaluation of NCE images nor in the comparison between CE and NCE images.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the quality of the NCE images obtained for every investigated station from the abdominal aorta to the calf.
Time Frame: 5 months
To evaluate the quality of the NCE images obtained for every investigated station from the abdominal aorta to the calf.
5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare the diagnostic performances of NCE images with those of CE MRA.
Time Frame: 5 months
To compare the diagnostic performances of NCE images with those of CE MRA.
5 months
To estimate the contribution of automated and dedicated post-processing tools in optimizing the diagnostic quality of the images.
Time Frame: 5 months
To estimate the contribution of automated and dedicated post-processing tools in optimizing the diagnostic quality of the images.
5 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yves Gandon, MD, Rennes University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 14, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 13, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2012

Last Verified

February 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LOC/10-03 - AngioIRM-Native
  • 2010-A00342-37 (OTHER: ID RCB from AFSSAPS)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Arterial Disease

Clinical Trials on NCE MRA and CE MRA

Subscribe