Effects of a Rehabilitation Program on Physical Performance and Disease Self-management in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

January 21, 2022 updated by: University Medical Center Groningen

Effects of a Group-based Exercise and Educational Program on Physical Performance and Disease Self-management in Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Randomized Controlled Study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of a group-based exercise and educational program for people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) on physical performance and disease-self-management.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Currently, the effectiveness of a program consisting of education to improve disease self-management combined with intensive exercises is not clear. In the present study the investigators developed a group-based program for people with RA consisting of physical exercise to increase physical performance (i.e. aerobic capacity and muscle strength) combined with an educational program to improve disease self-management (self-reported health status and self-efficacy). The investigators called it the 'FIT program'. The aim of the present randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to examine the effects of the FIT program on aerobic capacity, muscle strength, self-reported health status and self-efficacy, in a population of people with RA. The investigators hypothesized that the FIT-program would have beneficial effects on physical performance (ie. aerobic capacity and muscle strength) and disease self-management (i.e. perceived health status and self-efficacy components) compared to a waiting list control group (WLCgroup).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Groningen
      • Haren, Groningen, Netherlands, PO box 30 002
        • University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Rehabilitation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • medical diagnosis of RA according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
  • between 18 and 66 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe disease activity (Disease Activity Score:DAS-28 > 5.1)
  • cardiac or pulmonary diseases resulting in restrictions in their ability to follow a physical exercise program
  • a Steinbrocker classification of functional capacity in RA ≥ 3
  • no stable medication for the RA
  • intra-articular injections during the time of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: fit-program
Participants in the intervention group followed an eight week multi-disciplinary group rehabilitation program, consisting of a physical exercise part and an educational component.
Participants in the intervention group followed an eight week multi-disciplinary group rehabilitation program, consisting of a physical exercise part and an educational component. The physical exercise part consisted of a muscle exercise circuit and bicycle training,sport and aqua jogging. The educational part consisted of a weekly sixty minutes session. A multi-disciplinary group of healthcare professionals gave specialist orientated informational advice about how to handle the consequences of RA. Special attention was paid to ensure adjusting the level of each patients activity level to the participants' actual energy level. Further information was given about body sensations, sports, food and energy, pain, fatigue, emotional changes, sleeping disturbance and daily routine.
Other Names:
  • rehabilitation
Other: waiting list control group
The waiting-list control group was allowed to enter the FIT program for rehabilitation after the study period.
waiting list control group with no intervention
Other Names:
  • rehabilitation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in VO2 Max, Maximum Oxygen Uptake in ml/Min/kg is the Standard Index of Cardio-respiratory Fitness
Time Frame: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks
maximum oxygen uptake(VO2max, in ml/min/kg)was determined using the Åstrand-Rhyming test.The workload on the cycle ergometer was increased every minute by 25 watts until a steady-state heart rate was achieved. Participants had to sustain cycling for about 6 minutes, the heart rate(HR) was taken every minute. Mean HR of the 5th and 6th minute was registered. With the given workload, observed HR and participants'weight, maximal oxygen uptake can be established using the Åstrand-Rhyming nomogram. Values vary from < 21( sedentary with disease) to > 57 ( very good physical condition).
baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Self-efficacy Pain and Other Symptoms
Time Frame: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,
Self-efficacy was assessed by the Arthritis-Self-efficacy Scale Dutch version. This arthritis self-efficacy scale contains two sub scales: self-efficacy pain (5 items related to coping with pain, and self-efficacy other symptoms (6 items related to coping with other symptoms, such as depression, fatigue and frustrations.A five-point ordinal scale is used ranging from 'totally disagree' (1) to 'totally agree' (5). We computed a mean score of 11 items ranging from 1-5. A higher score refers to higher self-efficacy.
baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,
Change in Self-efficacy Function
Time Frame: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,
Self-efficacy function was assessed by the Arthritis-Self-efficacy Scale Dutch version The subscale self-efficacy function contains 8 items related to physical function. A five-point ordinal scale is used ranging from 'totally disagree' (1) to 'totally agree' (5). A mean score of 8 items was computed ranging from 1-5. A higher score refers to higher self-efficacy.
baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,
Change in Muscle Strength of the Upper Extremity
Time Frame: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,
Muscle strength was assessed using a hand-held dynamometer (Microfet, Hoggan health Industries Inc.USA).Maximal voluntary isometric muscle strength of the elbow-flexors, elbow-extensors, was tested and recorded three times for each muscle group. All tests were performed bilaterally. The mean value of three measurements was computed. In addition a sum score of the mean values of the flexors and extensors on both sides for the upper extremity (UE)was computed and taken for analyses.
baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,
Change in Muscle Strength of the Lower Extremity
Time Frame: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,
Muscle strength was assessed using a hand-held dynamometer (Microfet, Hoggan health Industries Inc.USA).Maximal voluntary isometric muscle strength of the knee-flexor and knee-extensors, was tested and recorded three times for each muscle group. All tests were performed bilaterally. The mean value of three measurements was computed. In addition a sum score of the mean values of the flexors and extensors on both sides for the lower extremity (LE)was computed and taken for analyses.
baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,
Change in Health Status: Physical Health
Time Frame: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,
Self-reported health status was assessed using the Arthritis Impact-Measurement Scale-2, the Dutch version (Dutch-AIMS2).The questionnaire contains 77 items which represent 5 dimensions: physical functioning, psychological functioning, symptoms, social interaction and role functioning. Responses are recorded on a 5-point scale. All responses were recoded and calculated to a 0-10 scale. Scores were modified according to the number of co-morbidity complaints, as was recommended in the Dutch-AIMS2 manual. A low score indicates better health.
baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,
Change in Health Status: Psychological Health
Time Frame: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,
Self-reported health status was assessed using the Arthritis Impact-Measurement Scale-2, the Dutch version (Dutch-AIMS2).The questionnaire contains 77 items which represent 5 dimensions: physical functioning, psychological functioning, symptoms, social interaction and role functioning. Responses are recorded on a 5-point scale. All responses were recoded and calculated to a 0-10 scale. Scores were modified according to the number of co-morbidity complaints, as was recommended in the Dutch-AIMS2 manual. A low score indicates better health.
baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,
Change in Health Status: Social Interaction
Time Frame: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,
Self-reported health status was assessed using the Arthritis Impact-Measurement Scale-2, the Dutch version (Dutch-AIMS2).The questionnaire contains 77 items which represent 5 dimensions: physical functioning, psychological functioning, symptoms, social interaction and role functioning. Responses are recorded on a 5-point scale. All responses were recoded and calculated to a 0-10 scale. Scores were modified according to the number of co-morbidity complaints, as was recommended in the Dutch-AIMS2 manual. A low score indicates better health.
baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ellen van Weert, phd, UMCG

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

March 3, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on experimental Fit-program

Subscribe