INAPEN Protocol for Impact of Breakfast Improvement (INAPEN)

April 26, 2011 updated by: Centre Hospitalier de Meaux

INAPEN Protocol for Impact of Breakfast Improvement on the Nutritional Status of Hospitalized Patients (INcidence de l'Amélioration du Petit-déjeuner Sur l'Etat Nutritinonel Des Patients hospitalisés)

Hospital undernutrition is a common health problem [1]. As a countermeasure, French hospitals have created a system of cross-function committees for feeding and nutrition called CLANs [Comité de Liaison pour l'alimentation et la nutrition] [2]. Potential actions for improving patient nutritional status include improving the characteristics of the food provided to increase both protein and calorie intake in at-risk patients that do not require enteral or parenteral nutrition. Looking at the various daily meals, the investigators considered that breakfast following the night fast would be the easiest meal to improve .

Condition Intervention Phase Patients scheduled for hospitalization of over 4 days Addition of protein (milky food in the breakfast) Current care

Study Overview

Detailed Description

INAPEN protocol for impact of breakfast improvement on the nutritional status of hospitalized patients (INcidence de l'Amélioration du Petit-déjeuner sur l'Etat Nutritinonel des patients hospitalisés)

Sponsored by Meaux Hospital (Centre Hospitalier de Meaux),

Financing: unrestricted grant from the French speaking society for enteral and parenteral nutrition [SFNEP: Société Francophone de nutrition entérale et parentérale].

Information provided by Meaux Hospital Center (Centre Hospitalier de Meaux) as per the protocol submitted to the SFNEP in 2009.

Purpose

Hospital undernutrition is a common health problem [1]. As a countermeasure, French hospitals have created a system of cross-function committees for feeding and nutrition called CLANs [Comité de Liaison pour l'alimentation et la nutrition] [2]. Potential actions for improving patient nutritional status include improving the characteristics of the food provided to increase both protein and calorie intake in at-risk patients that do not require enteral or parenteral nutrition. Looking at the various daily meals, we considered that breakfast following the night fast would be the easiest meal to improve .

Condition Intervention Phase Patients scheduled for hospitalization of over 4 days Addition of protein (milky food in the breakfast) Current care

Study Type: Interventional study in current care

Study design: Sequential cohorts, Efficacy study

Official title: Inapen Impact of breakfast improvement on the nutritional status of hospitalized patients (Incidence de l'amélioration du petit-déjeuner sur l'état nutritionnel des patients hospitalisés).

Further study details:

Primary outcome: Improvement of serum transthyretin (prealbumin) concentration changes between D0 to D7 Secondary outcomes: serum albumin concentration changes between D0 to D7, length of stay

Expected total enrollment: 800 patients (400 patients x 2).

Study start date: October 2009 Expected inclusion completion date: June 2011

Rationale:

It has long been known that more than half of hospitalized patients suffer from undernutrition [3-5]), consequently increasing length of stay of 2 to 6 days and morbidity [3]. Early nutrition has been shown to reduce length of stay and hospitalization costs [3, 6], but is mostly based on early enteral or parenteral nutrition. Our purpose was to evaluate the impact of an improved oral nutrition in mildly-challenged hospitalized patients. It is widely accepted that breakfast should deliver 25% of energy intake and nutritional requirements (ref4). A preliminary study found that the total protein and energy impact of breakfast in Meaux hospital was 4 g protein and 346 Kcal of total energy intake, whereas French institutional catering recommendations on nutrition (Groupe d'Etude des Marchés de Restauration Collective et de Nutrition, GEM RCN) stipulate 7.75 g of protein and 403 Kcal of energy.

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of additional protein (adding milky food to the breakfast) in order to deliver an optimized protein and energy intake of 15.75 g and 559 Kcal, respectively.

A first period of follow-up on the 400 patients was designed to survey and evaluate current nutrition administration policy. The second period of follow-up on the 400 patients was designed to evaluate the impacts of adding milky food to the breakfast and of educating health care professionals on the early detection of undernutrition. Efficacy will be evaluated based on increase in transthyretin concentrations, with special focus given to length of stay as a secondary end-point.

Eligibility Ages eligible for study: > 18 years. Both genders eligible for study.

Location and Contact Information France Rheumatology, Cardiology, Neurology, Pneumology departements Vascular and orthopedic surgery department

Study directorship and principal investigators Xavier Forceville, MD, PhD, Principal investigator Francois Thuillier, Pharmacist, CLAN chairman Karell Prieux-Lucas, Investigator Samia Touati, MD, Investigator

Further information

Study ID Number: CNIL : 909314 Health Authority: France CCTIRS : 09.358 (2009, september 10Th) Ethical committee: France, Ile-de-France XI (Saint Germain-en-Laye), August 17th, 2009

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

800

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Meaux, France, 77
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier de Meaux
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Xavier Forceville, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Samia Touati, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Karell Prieux - Lucas, Dietitian

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients hospitalized for 8 days or more in the participant wards and capable of eating the proposed breakfast.

According to the current care procedure, patients receiving an information document and offered the possibility of refusal.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • End of life defined as an absence of curative treatment (limitation of care)
  • Enteral or parenteral nutrition
  • Need for limitations on oral nutrition (i.e. post-surgery)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Observational period
A first period of follow-up on the 400 patients was designed to survey and evaluate current nutrition administration policy
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of additional protein (adding milky food to the breakfast) in order to deliver an optimized protein and energy intake of 15.75 g and 559 Kcal, respectively.
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention period
The second period of follow-up on the 400 patients was designed to evaluate the impacts of adding milky food to the breakfast and of educating health care professionals on the early detection of undernutrition.
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of additional protein (adding milky food to the breakfast) in order to deliver an optimized protein and energy intake of 15.75 g and 559 Kcal, respectively.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
serum transthyretin (prealbumin) concentration
Time Frame: changes between D0 to D7 between the 2 cohorts
Improvement of serum transthyretin (prealbumin) concentration changes between D0 to D7
changes between D0 to D7 between the 2 cohorts

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
serum albumin concentration changes and length of stay
Time Frame: Changes between the 2 cohorts
serum albumin concentration changes between D0 to D7, length of stay
Changes between the 2 cohorts

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 27, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 27, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2011

Last Verified

April 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malnutrition

Clinical Trials on Addition of protein (milky food in the breakfast)

3
Subscribe