Vascular Alteration and Evolution of Cognitive Impairment (ADELAHYDE2)

September 9, 2025 updated by: Pr Athanase BENETOS, Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Arterial Function and Structure and Evolution of Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Hypertensive Subjects With Subjective Memory Complaints

In the cross sectional study "Adelahyde 1" which took place between 2001 and 2005, the investigators data suggest that vascular alterations may play a role in the setting of subjective memory complaints.

This longitudinal study (Adelahyde 2) aims to confirm the role of vascular factors in the evolution of cognitive function and dementia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: The role of arterial hypertension and vascular alterations in the development of cognitive decline is a major issue in both research and clinical practice. In a recently published cross-sectional study (Kearney-Schwartz, Rossignol et al. 2009), conducted on the "ADELAHYDE" cohort comprised of older hypertensive patients with memory complaints, the investigators showed the association of arterial changes (hypertrophy and arterial stiffness, endothelial dysfunction) with cognitive functions and/or white matter hyperintensities on MRI. A longitudinal study is the only means to confirm the role of vascular factors in the evolution of cognitive function and onset of dementia.

Objectives: i) Primary: To establish, in the "ADELAHYDE" cohort, the relationship between vascular alterations assessed at baseline during the cross-sectional study (hypertrophy and arterial stiffness, endothelial dysfunction) and the evolution of cognitive function (primary study endpoint) over a 8-year follow-up period; ii) Secondary a) To investigate the evolution of white matter hyperintensities on MRI (secondary study endpoint) as a function of peripheral vascular status, and especially of endothelial function. b) Determine the role of genetic factors and biomarkers of oxidative stress (from DNA and serum biobanks collected at the first visit) in the evolution of cognitive functions and white matter hyperintensities.

Methods: Prospective longitudinal single center study. All patients (378 subjects) who participated in the baseline cross-sectional study conducted between 2001 and 2005, will be reconvened at the Clinical Investigation Centre (CIC) of Nancy.

As in the cross-sectional study, the following will be assessed in this longitudinal phase: pulse wave velocity (PWV), carotid ultrasonography, flow-mediated dilation, brain MRI with semi-quantification of white matter hyperintensities, cognitive function evaluation and measurement of various biomarkers of endothelial function.

Expected fallouts: A major benefit of this project is that this cohort has already been explored in terms of cognitive function, arterial properties and neurovascular imaging (MRI). Thus, the programmed reconvening of these subjects for this project in 2011 will enable us to identify the role of vascular alterations in the evolution of cognitive function and leucoaraiosis in this population at high risk of dementia over a period of at least 8 years. Finally, it could pave the way for further investigations, notably in the field of cognitive impairment prevention, aimed at reducing or delaying the onset of dementia by acting on the "vascular factor", which is potentially modifiable.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

131

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nancy, France, 54500
        • CHU Nancy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 85 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient who have participated Adelahyde 1 study
  • patient who have signed a consent
  • patient who have a social security

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient who can't understand information letter and who is not under legal protection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Elderly hypertensive patients with mnemonic subjective

Elderly hypertensive patients with mnemonic subjective without dementia. Interventions :

blood sampling brain MRI Assessment of cognitive functions brain MRI and TEP cerebral Electrocardiogram and blood pressure Pulse wave velocity Quality of life questionnaire Urine sample Vascular explorations

take a sample of blood, 46 ml
magnetic resonance imaging
Folstein MMSE, Mac Nair scale, Depression (GDS) scale, The Benton Visual Retention Test, Test of verbal fluency, formal and categorical, Trail Making Test, Grober et Buschke scale (RL/RI-16), Apathy Robert scale, Praxis rating Scale .
Electrocardiogramm Blood pressure monitoring
Pulse wave velocity, VWF, IMT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Global memory, visual retention and verbal fluency composite score
Time Frame: up to two years
up to two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
vascular exploration
Time Frame: up to two years
Pulse wave velocity, VWF, IMT
up to two years
white matter hyperintensities by fazekas score.
Time Frame: up to two years
Hyperintensities of white matter will be classified following the Fazekas scale (6 ranks.
up to two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Athanase BENETOS, professor, CHU Nancy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2011

First Posted (Estimated)

May 11, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on blood sampling

Subscribe