- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01355939
Comparative Effectiveness Multicenter Trial for Adhesion Characteristics of Ventral Hernia Repair Mesh
A Prospective Multicenter Trial to Evaluate Adhesion Characteristics and Adhesiolysis-related Complications of Barrier-coated and Non-barrier-coated Intraperitoneal Mesh During Abdominal Re-exploration After Prior Ventral Hernia Repair
The proposed study will compare the benefits, harms, and comparative effectiveness of intraperitoneal barrier-coated and non-barrier coated ventral hernia repair (VHR) mesh in reducing adhesions, adhesion-related complications, and adhesiolysis sequelae in actual patient subpopulations and clinical circumstances. A subset of the data will be analyzed to compare the benefits, harms, and comparative effectiveness of the laparoscopic and open approaches to adhesiolysis. A comprehensive array of health-related risk factors and patient-centered outcomes will be assessed in the investigators diverse patient population for proper multivariate data analysis.
Specific Aim I: To evaluate and compare the adhesion characteristics of intraperitoneal barrier-coated versus non-barrier-coated mesh during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.
Specific Aim II: To evaluate and compare the adhesion-related complications and adhesiolysis-related complications of intraperitoneal barrier-coated versus non-barrier-coated mesh during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.
Specific Aim III: To determine the comparative effectiveness of intraperitoneal barrier-coated versus non-barrier-coated ventral hernia repair mesh in reducing adhesions, adhesion-related complications, and adhesiolysis sequelae in actual patient subpopulations and clinical circumstances.
Specific Aim IV: To evaluate and compare the adhesiolysis-related complications of the laparoscopic and open approaches to adhesiolysis during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.
Specific Aim V: To determine the comparative effectiveness of the laparoscopic and open approaches to adhesiolysis during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85054
- Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92103
- University of California-San Diego
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Springfield, Massachusetts, United States, 01199
- Baystate Medical Center
-
-
Missouri
-
St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
- Washington University
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10028
- Mount Sinai Medical Center
-
-
South Carolina
-
Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29615
- Greenville Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- greater than or equal to 18 years of age
- prior ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal placement of mesh (open or laparoscopic approach; absorbable barrier-coated mesh, permanent barrier-coated composite mesh, permanent barrier-coated noncomposite mesh, non-barrier-coated polypropylene mesh, or biologic mesh)
- subsequent abdominal procedure requiring exposure of entire surface area of intraperitoneal mesh
Exclusion Criteria:
- less than 18 years of age
- inability to verify intraperitoneal mesh type or location
- active abdominal wound infection or open abdominal wound
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Abdominal surgery after prior VHR with barrier-coated mesh
|
This is a prospective observational study.
Abdominal re-exploration surgery is clinically-indicated and planned as the standard of care for the patients regardless of their decision to participate in the study.
Other Names:
|
|
Abdominal surgery after prior VHR with nonbarrier-coated mesh
|
This is a prospective observational study.
Abdominal re-exploration surgery is clinically-indicated and planned as the standard of care for the patients regardless of their decision to participate in the study.
Other Names:
|
|
Lap adhesiolysis during abdominal surgery after prior VHR
|
This is a prospective observational study.
Abdominal re-exploration surgery is clinically-indicated and planned as the standard of care for the patients regardless of their decision to participate in the study.
Other Names:
|
|
Open adhesioloysis during abdominal surgery after prior VHR
|
This is a prospective observational study.
Abdominal re-exploration surgery is clinically-indicated and planned as the standard of care for the patients regardless of their decision to participate in the study.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Mesh adhesiolysis time:Mesh surface area
Time Frame: Intraoperatively (day 1)
|
Intraoperatively (day 1)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Mesh Contracture
Time Frame: Intraoperatively (day 1)
|
Intraoperatively (day 1)
|
|
Mesh adhesion tenacity
Time Frame: Intraoperatively (day 1)
|
Intraoperatively (day 1)
|
|
Percentage mesh surface area covered with adhesions
Time Frame: Intraoperatively (day 1)
|
Intraoperatively (day 1)
|
|
Adhesiolysis time to abdominal wall
Time Frame: Intraoperatively (day 1)
|
Intraoperatively (day 1)
|
|
Adhesiolysis time to mesh
Time Frame: Intraoperatively (day 1)
|
Intraoperatively (day 1)
|
|
Incidence of adhesiolysis-related intra-operative complications
Time Frame: Intraoperatively (day 1)
|
Intraoperatively (day 1)
|
|
Length of stay of hospital admission
Time Frame: 30 day postoperative
|
30 day postoperative
|
|
Length of stay in ICU
Time Frame: 30 day postoperative
|
30 day postoperative
|
|
Interval to return to bowel function
Time Frame: 30 day postoperative
|
30 day postoperative
|
|
Interval to return to independent ambulation or activities of daily living
Time Frame: 30 day postoperative
|
30 day postoperative
|
|
Interval to return to work or routine physical activity
Time Frame: 30 day postoperative
|
30 day postoperative
|
|
Incidence of postoperative complications
Time Frame: 30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
|
30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
|
|
Incidence of surgical site infection
Time Frame: 30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
|
30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
|
|
Incidence of initiation of antibiotics, blood and total parenteral nutrition
Time Frame: 30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
|
30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
|
|
Incidence of bedside procedures to address a postoperative surgical complication
Time Frame: 30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
|
30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
|
|
Incidence of surgery under local anesthesia to address a postoperative complication
Time Frame: 30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
|
30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
|
|
Incidence of single system organ failure
Time Frame: 30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
|
30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
|
|
Incidence of multiple-system organ failure
Time Frame: 30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
|
30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
|
|
Mortality rate
Time Frame: 30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
|
30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael Brunt, M.D., Washington University School of Medicine
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2011-02112
- 1KM1CA156708-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ventral Hernia
-
Varazdin General HospitalCompletedIncisional Ventral Hernia | Recurrent Ventral HerniaCroatia
-
Anne Arundel Health System Research InstituteMedtronic - MITGCompletedGrade I Ventral Hernia | Grade II Ventral HerniaUnited States
-
Sofregen Medical, Inc.TerminatedVentral Hernia RepairUnited States
-
GSVM Medical CollegeCompleted
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceRecruitingVentral Hernia RepairFrance
-
Makassed General HospitalSuspended
-
Zaza DemetrashviliRecruitingLarge Midline Ventral HerniaGeorgia
-
Hvidovre University HospitalUniversity of CopenhagenCompleted
-
Hvidovre University HospitalCopenhagen University Hospital at HerlevCompleted
-
Distalmotion SAConfinisCompletedVentral Hernia RepairSwitzerland, Austria, France, Germany