Comparative Effectiveness Multicenter Trial for Adhesion Characteristics of Ventral Hernia Repair Mesh

February 19, 2015 updated by: Washington University School of Medicine

A Prospective Multicenter Trial to Evaluate Adhesion Characteristics and Adhesiolysis-related Complications of Barrier-coated and Non-barrier-coated Intraperitoneal Mesh During Abdominal Re-exploration After Prior Ventral Hernia Repair

The proposed study will compare the benefits, harms, and comparative effectiveness of intraperitoneal barrier-coated and non-barrier coated ventral hernia repair (VHR) mesh in reducing adhesions, adhesion-related complications, and adhesiolysis sequelae in actual patient subpopulations and clinical circumstances. A subset of the data will be analyzed to compare the benefits, harms, and comparative effectiveness of the laparoscopic and open approaches to adhesiolysis. A comprehensive array of health-related risk factors and patient-centered outcomes will be assessed in the investigators diverse patient population for proper multivariate data analysis.

Specific Aim I: To evaluate and compare the adhesion characteristics of intraperitoneal barrier-coated versus non-barrier-coated mesh during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.

Specific Aim II: To evaluate and compare the adhesion-related complications and adhesiolysis-related complications of intraperitoneal barrier-coated versus non-barrier-coated mesh during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.

Specific Aim III: To determine the comparative effectiveness of intraperitoneal barrier-coated versus non-barrier-coated ventral hernia repair mesh in reducing adhesions, adhesion-related complications, and adhesiolysis sequelae in actual patient subpopulations and clinical circumstances.

Specific Aim IV: To evaluate and compare the adhesiolysis-related complications of the laparoscopic and open approaches to adhesiolysis during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.

Specific Aim V: To determine the comparative effectiveness of the laparoscopic and open approaches to adhesiolysis during abdominal re-exploration after prior ventral hernia repair.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

173

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85054
        • Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • University of California-San Diego
    • Massachusetts
      • Springfield, Massachusetts, United States, 01199
        • Baystate Medical Center
    • Missouri
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10028
        • Mount Sinai Medical Center
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29615
        • Greenville Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Investigators' patient population

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • greater than or equal to 18 years of age
  • prior ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal placement of mesh (open or laparoscopic approach; absorbable barrier-coated mesh, permanent barrier-coated composite mesh, permanent barrier-coated noncomposite mesh, non-barrier-coated polypropylene mesh, or biologic mesh)
  • subsequent abdominal procedure requiring exposure of entire surface area of intraperitoneal mesh

Exclusion Criteria:

  • less than 18 years of age
  • inability to verify intraperitoneal mesh type or location
  • active abdominal wound infection or open abdominal wound

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Abdominal surgery after prior VHR with barrier-coated mesh
This is a prospective observational study. Abdominal re-exploration surgery is clinically-indicated and planned as the standard of care for the patients regardless of their decision to participate in the study.
Other Names:
  • Bard(TM) Mesh
  • PROLENE(TM)
  • ProLite(TM)
  • ProLite(TM) Ultra(TM)
  • Bard(TM) Soft Mesh
  • PROLENE(TM) Soft
  • Parietex(TM) Flat Sheet TEC
  • INFINIT(TM) Mesh
  • C-QUR Lite(TM)
  • ULTRAPRO(TM)
  • PROLENE(TM) Hernia System
  • Bard(TM) Mesh PerFix Plug
  • Bard(TM) Ventralex
  • C-QUR(TM) Mesh
  • PROCEED(TM)
  • Bard(TM) Sepramesh(TM) IP Composite
  • Parietex(TM) Composite
  • PHYSIOMESH(TM)
  • Bard(TM) Composix(TM) E/X
  • Bard(TM) Composix(TM) L/P
  • DUALMESH(R)
  • DUALMESH(R) Plus
  • VICRYL(TM)
  • TIGR(R) Matrix
  • Gore (R) Bio-A(R)
  • AlloDerm(R)
  • AlloMax(TM)
  • FlexHD(R)
  • Biodesign(TM) Surgisis(R)
  • Strattice(TM)
  • XenMatrix(TM)
  • Veritas(R)
  • SurgiMend(R)
  • Peri-Guard(R)
  • Permacol(TM)
  • CollaMend(TM) FM
  • CollaMend(TM)
Abdominal surgery after prior VHR with nonbarrier-coated mesh
This is a prospective observational study. Abdominal re-exploration surgery is clinically-indicated and planned as the standard of care for the patients regardless of their decision to participate in the study.
Other Names:
  • Bard(TM) Mesh
  • PROLENE(TM)
  • ProLite(TM)
  • ProLite(TM) Ultra(TM)
  • Bard(TM) Soft Mesh
  • PROLENE(TM) Soft
  • Parietex(TM) Flat Sheet TEC
  • INFINIT(TM) Mesh
  • C-QUR Lite(TM)
  • ULTRAPRO(TM)
  • PROLENE(TM) Hernia System
  • Bard(TM) Mesh PerFix Plug
  • Bard(TM) Ventralex
  • C-QUR(TM) Mesh
  • PROCEED(TM)
  • Bard(TM) Sepramesh(TM) IP Composite
  • Parietex(TM) Composite
  • PHYSIOMESH(TM)
  • Bard(TM) Composix(TM) E/X
  • Bard(TM) Composix(TM) L/P
  • DUALMESH(R)
  • DUALMESH(R) Plus
  • VICRYL(TM)
  • TIGR(R) Matrix
  • Gore (R) Bio-A(R)
  • AlloDerm(R)
  • AlloMax(TM)
  • FlexHD(R)
  • Biodesign(TM) Surgisis(R)
  • Strattice(TM)
  • XenMatrix(TM)
  • Veritas(R)
  • SurgiMend(R)
  • Peri-Guard(R)
  • Permacol(TM)
  • CollaMend(TM) FM
  • CollaMend(TM)
Lap adhesiolysis during abdominal surgery after prior VHR
This is a prospective observational study. Abdominal re-exploration surgery is clinically-indicated and planned as the standard of care for the patients regardless of their decision to participate in the study.
Other Names:
  • Bard(TM) Mesh
  • PROLENE(TM)
  • ProLite(TM)
  • ProLite(TM) Ultra(TM)
  • Bard(TM) Soft Mesh
  • PROLENE(TM) Soft
  • Parietex(TM) Flat Sheet TEC
  • INFINIT(TM) Mesh
  • C-QUR Lite(TM)
  • ULTRAPRO(TM)
  • PROLENE(TM) Hernia System
  • Bard(TM) Mesh PerFix Plug
  • Bard(TM) Ventralex
  • C-QUR(TM) Mesh
  • PROCEED(TM)
  • Bard(TM) Sepramesh(TM) IP Composite
  • Parietex(TM) Composite
  • PHYSIOMESH(TM)
  • Bard(TM) Composix(TM) E/X
  • Bard(TM) Composix(TM) L/P
  • DUALMESH(R)
  • DUALMESH(R) Plus
  • VICRYL(TM)
  • TIGR(R) Matrix
  • Gore (R) Bio-A(R)
  • AlloDerm(R)
  • AlloMax(TM)
  • FlexHD(R)
  • Biodesign(TM) Surgisis(R)
  • Strattice(TM)
  • XenMatrix(TM)
  • Veritas(R)
  • SurgiMend(R)
  • Peri-Guard(R)
  • Permacol(TM)
  • CollaMend(TM) FM
  • CollaMend(TM)
Open adhesioloysis during abdominal surgery after prior VHR
This is a prospective observational study. Abdominal re-exploration surgery is clinically-indicated and planned as the standard of care for the patients regardless of their decision to participate in the study.
Other Names:
  • Bard(TM) Mesh
  • PROLENE(TM)
  • ProLite(TM)
  • ProLite(TM) Ultra(TM)
  • Bard(TM) Soft Mesh
  • PROLENE(TM) Soft
  • Parietex(TM) Flat Sheet TEC
  • INFINIT(TM) Mesh
  • C-QUR Lite(TM)
  • ULTRAPRO(TM)
  • PROLENE(TM) Hernia System
  • Bard(TM) Mesh PerFix Plug
  • Bard(TM) Ventralex
  • C-QUR(TM) Mesh
  • PROCEED(TM)
  • Bard(TM) Sepramesh(TM) IP Composite
  • Parietex(TM) Composite
  • PHYSIOMESH(TM)
  • Bard(TM) Composix(TM) E/X
  • Bard(TM) Composix(TM) L/P
  • DUALMESH(R)
  • DUALMESH(R) Plus
  • VICRYL(TM)
  • TIGR(R) Matrix
  • Gore (R) Bio-A(R)
  • AlloDerm(R)
  • AlloMax(TM)
  • FlexHD(R)
  • Biodesign(TM) Surgisis(R)
  • Strattice(TM)
  • XenMatrix(TM)
  • Veritas(R)
  • SurgiMend(R)
  • Peri-Guard(R)
  • Permacol(TM)
  • CollaMend(TM) FM
  • CollaMend(TM)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mesh adhesiolysis time:Mesh surface area
Time Frame: Intraoperatively (day 1)
Intraoperatively (day 1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mesh Contracture
Time Frame: Intraoperatively (day 1)
Intraoperatively (day 1)
Mesh adhesion tenacity
Time Frame: Intraoperatively (day 1)
Intraoperatively (day 1)
Percentage mesh surface area covered with adhesions
Time Frame: Intraoperatively (day 1)
Intraoperatively (day 1)
Adhesiolysis time to abdominal wall
Time Frame: Intraoperatively (day 1)
Intraoperatively (day 1)
Adhesiolysis time to mesh
Time Frame: Intraoperatively (day 1)
Intraoperatively (day 1)
Incidence of adhesiolysis-related intra-operative complications
Time Frame: Intraoperatively (day 1)
Intraoperatively (day 1)
Length of stay of hospital admission
Time Frame: 30 day postoperative
30 day postoperative
Length of stay in ICU
Time Frame: 30 day postoperative
30 day postoperative
Interval to return to bowel function
Time Frame: 30 day postoperative
30 day postoperative
Interval to return to independent ambulation or activities of daily living
Time Frame: 30 day postoperative
30 day postoperative
Interval to return to work or routine physical activity
Time Frame: 30 day postoperative
30 day postoperative
Incidence of postoperative complications
Time Frame: 30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
Incidence of surgical site infection
Time Frame: 30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
Incidence of initiation of antibiotics, blood and total parenteral nutrition
Time Frame: 30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
Incidence of bedside procedures to address a postoperative surgical complication
Time Frame: 30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
Incidence of surgery under local anesthesia to address a postoperative complication
Time Frame: 30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
Incidence of single system organ failure
Time Frame: 30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
Incidence of multiple-system organ failure
Time Frame: 30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
Mortality rate
Time Frame: 30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative
30 day, 12 month, and 24 month postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Brunt, M.D., Washington University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 19, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 23, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventral Hernia

Subscribe