Trial to Evaluate the Safety & Efficacy of the Omnilink Elite™ Peripheral Balloon-Expandable Stent System in Subjects With Atherosclerotic de Novo or Restenotic Lesions in the Native Common Iliac Artery and/or Native External Iliac Artery (MOBILITY OE)

January 8, 2016 updated by: Abbott Medical Devices

A Prospective, Non-randomized, Two Arm, Multi-center Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System and the Omnilink Elite™ Peripheral Balloon-Expandable Stent System in Subjects With Atherosclerotic de Novo or Restenotic Lesions in the Native Common Iliac Artery and/or Native External Iliac Artery.

To determine the safety and efficacy of the Omnilink Elite™ Peripheral Balloon-Expandable Stent System in subjects with atherosclerotic de novo or restenotic lesions in the native common iliac artery and/or native external iliac artery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The MOBILITY study was a prospective, non-randomized, two-arm, multi-center study. The 2 arms (Omnilink Elite arm and Absolute Pro arm) were designed to independently assess the safety and effectiveness of the 2 devices used in this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

153

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Santa Clara, California, United States, 95054
        • Abbott Vascular

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Clinical Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject must be at least 18 and < 90 years of age.
  2. Subject has been informed of the nature of the trial, agrees to its provisions, and has signed the informed consent form.
  3. Subject must agree to undergo all protocol-required follow-up examinations and requirements at the investigational site.
  4. History of symptomatic claudication (Rutherford Becker Clinical Category 2-3) or ischemic rest pain (Rutherford Becker Clinical Category 4).
  5. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have had a negative pregnancy test before treatment, and must not be nursing at the time of treatment, and agree at time of consent to use birth control during participation in this trial up to and including the follow-up at 9 months.

Angiographic Inclusion Criteria

  1. Up to two bilateral de novo or restenotic lesions of the native common iliac artery and/or native external iliac artery may be treated(one per side).
  2. Common iliac artery lesion visually estimated to be ≥50% stenosis and ≤100% stenosis (total occlusion)
  3. External iliac artery lesion visually estimated to be ≥50% stenosis and ≤99% stenosis
  4. Lesion length for stenosis of the common or external iliac artery visually estimated to be ≥ 10 mm and ≤ 110 mm (Absolute Pro)
  5. Lesion length for total occlusion of the common iliac artery visually estimated to be ≤40 mm
  6. Target vessel reference diameter visually estimated to be ≥3.6 mm and ≤9.1 mm (Absolute Pro)
  7. On the treatment side(s), patent superficial femoral and popliteal arteries and at least one patent distal outflow artery with in-line distal vessel flow to the foot as confirmed by arteriography. Patent is defined as < 50% stenosis.
  8. Lesion length for stenosis of the common or external iliac artery visually estimated to be ≥ 10 mm and ≤ 50 mm (Omnilink Elite).
  9. Target vessel reference diameter visually estimated to be ≥ 5.0 mm and ≤ 11.0 mm (Omnilink Elite).

Clinical Exclusion Criteria

  1. Subject is unable to walk.
  2. Subject has had recent major surgery (last 3 months) e.g., abdominal surgery, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, thoracic surgery.
  3. Subject has received, or is on the waiting list for a major organ transplant (heart, lung, kidney, liver).
  4. Subject is diagnosed as Rutherford Becker Clinical Category 0, 1, 5, or 6.
  5. Subject has ulcers or lesions on the lower extremity(ies) of the target lesion side(s).
  6. Subject has elevated serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl.
  7. Subject has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) (serum glucose > 400 mg/dl).
  8. Subject has had a myocardial infarction(MI)(Q-wave or NQWMI) within the previous 30 days.
  9. Subject has had a stroke within the previous 30 days and/or has deficits from a prior stroke that limits the subjects ability to walk.
  10. Subject has unstable angina defined as rest angina with ECG changes.
  11. Subject has a groin infection, or an acute systemic infection that is currently under treatment.
  12. Subject has acute thrombophlebitis or deep vein thrombosis in either extremity.
  13. Subject requires any planned procedure within 30 days after the index procedure that would necessitate the discontinuation of aspirin, clopidogrel or ticlopidine following the procedure.
  14. Subject has other medical illnesses (e.g., cancer or congestive heart failure) that may cause the subject to be non-compliant with protocol requirements, confound the data interpretation, or is associated with limited life-expectancy (i.e., less than 2 years).
  15. Subject is currently participating in an investigational drug or device trial that has not completed the primary endpoint follow-up or that clinically interferes with the current trial endpoints.
  16. Subject is unable to understand or unwilling to cooperate with trial procedures or is unwilling or unable to return to the treatment center for follow-up visits.
  17. If intended stent is Absolute Pro, subject has known hypersensitivity or contraindication to nickel, titanium or platinum; subject has known hypersensitivity or contraindication to standard intraprocedure anticoagulant(s); subject has sensitivity to contrast which cannot be adequately pre-treated with medication.
  18. Subject has known allergy or contraindication to aspirin or clopidogrel (Plavix®); if allergy or contraindication is to clopidogrel, subject is unable to tolerate ticlopidine (Ticlid®).
  19. Subject has known bleeding disorder or hypercoagulable disorder, or will refuse blood transfusions.
  20. Subject has suffered a gastrointestinal (GI) bleed within 30 days before the index procedure that would interfere with antiplatelet therapy.
  21. If intended stent is Omnilink Elite, subject has known hypersensitivity or contraindication to cobalt chromium; subject has known hypersensitivity or contraindication to standard intraprocedure anticoagulant(s); subject has sensitivity to contrast which cannot be adequately pre-treated with medication.
  22. Requirement of general anesthesia or spinal block for the procedure.
  23. Presence of contralateral limb amputation that was performed to treat any non-traumatic disease in that limb, e.g. atherosclerotic, vascular, neuropathic.
  24. Presence of bypass conduit in any outflow vessel, i.e. SFA, popliteal, anterior tibial, posterior tibial, peroneal, ipsilateral to the target lesion.
  25. Subject requires a concomitant percutaneous endovascular procedure in another vessel, e.g. coronary.
  26. Target lesion is in an iliac artery that has been previously stented.

Angiographic Exclusion Criteria

  1. Subject has a totally occluded (100% stenosis) external iliac artery ipsilateral to the target lesion.
  2. Subject has a totally occluded (100% stenosis) outflow artery (SFA) ipsilateral to the target lesion
  3. Target lesion is within or adjacent to an aneurysm.
  4. Lesion is located within or beyond a vessel that contains a bypass graft.
  5. Lesion(s) requires atherectomy (or ablative devices) to facilitate stent delivery.
  6. Subject has a history of aortic revascularization or has an abdominal aortic aneurysm > 3cm.
  7. Lesion extends beyond the inguinal ligament.
  8. Subject has angiographic evidence of thrombus in the target disease segment or vessel that is unresponsive to anti-thrombotic therapies.
  9. Subject has multilevel disease in the target extremity that requires other staged procedures within 30 days before or after the procedure.
  10. On the treatment side(s), subject is without patent superficial femoral and popliteal arteries and at least one patent distal outflow artery with in-line distal vessel flow to the foot as confirmed by arteriography. Patent is defined as < 50% stenosis.
  11. Requirement for > 1 stent to treat full length of lesion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Omnilink Elite™ Peripheral Balloon-Expandable Stent System
Patients with treatment of a maximum of two bilateral de novo or restenotic atherosclerotic lesions in the native common iliac artery and/or native external iliac artery (one lesion per side).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major Adverse Event (MAE)
Time Frame: 9 months
Defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), clinically-driven target lesion revascularization, and limb loss (major amputation only) on the treated side(s).
9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: Pre-procedure
The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.
Pre-procedure
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 1 month
The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.
1 month
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 9 months
The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.
9 months
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 2 years
The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.
2 years
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 3 years
The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.
3 years
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: Pre-Procedure

The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia.

Category and Clinical Description:

0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable

Pre-Procedure
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 1 month

The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia.

Category and Clinical Description:

0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable

1 month
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 9 months

The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia.

Category and Clinical Description:

0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable

9 months
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 2 years

The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia.

Category and Clinical Description:

0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable

2 years
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 3 years

The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia.

Category and Clinical Description:

0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable

3 years
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: Between baseline and 1 month

Change in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category:

Worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category:

Deterioration (an increase) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category by at least two categories from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement or to a category 5 or 6.

Improved Rutherford Becker Clinical Category:

An improvement (a decrease) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category of at least one category from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement.

Between baseline and 1 month
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: Between baseline and 9 months

Change in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category:

Worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category:

Deterioration (an increase) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category by at least two categories from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement or to a category 5 or 6.

Improved Rutherford Becker Clinical Category:

An improvement (a decrease) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category of at least one category from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement.

Between baseline and 9 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)
Time Frame: 1 month and 9 months
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Clinically-driven is defined as: Revascularization of the stent with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion, and target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography.) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon or stent into a study stent, that has <50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel).
1 month and 9 months
Primary Stent Patency
Time Frame: 1 month
Absence of in-stent restenosis of the target lesion (≥50%) as determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram and without interval reintervention since the initial study procedure.
1 month
Primary Stent Patency
Time Frame: 9 months
Absence of in-stent restenosis of the target lesion (≥50%) as determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram and without interval reintervention since the initial study procedure.
9 months
Restenosis
Time Frame: 9 months
Defined as ≥ 50% stenosis at follow-up.
9 months
Restenosis
Time Frame: 2 years
Defined as ≥ 50% stenosis at follow-up.
2 years
Restenosis
Time Frame: 3 years
Defined as ≥ 50% stenosis at follow-up.
3 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Death (All Cause)
Time Frame: 1 month and 9 months
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years
1 month and 9 months
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Physical Component Summary
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month

This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean.

SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.

Baseline and 1 month
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Physical Component Summary
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 months

This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean.

SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.

Baseline and 9 months
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Physical Component Summary
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 years

This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean.

SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.

Baseline and 2 years
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Physical Component Summary
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 years

This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean.

SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.

Baseline and 3 years
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Mental Component Summary
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 month

This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean.

SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.

Baseline and 1 month
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Mental Component Summary
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 months

This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean.

SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.

Baseline and 9 months
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Mental Component Summary
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 years

This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean.

SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.

Baseline and 2 years
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Mental Component Summary
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 years

This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean.

SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.

Baseline and 3 years
Device Success
Time Frame: Acute: from beginning of index procedure to end of procedure
On a per device basis, the achievement of successful delivery and deployment of the trial device(s) at the intended location(s) and successful withdrawal of the delivery catheter(s).
Acute: from beginning of index procedure to end of procedure
Technical Success
Time Frame: Acute: from beginning of index procedure to end of procedure
Technical success is defined as device success (the achievement of successful delivery and deployment of the trial device(s) at the intended target lesion(s), successful withdrawal of the delivery catheter(s)), and attainment of a final residual stenosis of < 30% by QA or as reported by the investigator.
Acute: from beginning of index procedure to end of procedure
Procedure Success
Time Frame: Beginning of index procedure to 2 days post-index procedure or discharge, whichever is sooner
Procedure success is defined as technical success (device success and attainment of a final residual stenosis of < 30% by QA) without complications within two (2) days after the index procedure or at hospital discharge, whichever is sooner.
Beginning of index procedure to 2 days post-index procedure or discharge, whichever is sooner
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: Post-Procedure
The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.
Post-Procedure
Changes in Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: Between baseline and Post-procedure
The changes in thigh brachial index is the absolute change between the pre-procedure measure and the stated timepoint measure.
Between baseline and Post-procedure
Changes in Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: Between Baseline and 1 month
The changes in thigh brachial index is the absolute change between the pre-procedure measure and the stated timepoint measure.
Between Baseline and 1 month
Changes in Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: Between baseline and 9 months
The changes in thigh brachial index is the absolute change between the pre-procedure measure and the stated timepoint measure.
Between baseline and 9 months
Changes in Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: Between baseline and 2 years
The changes in thigh brachial index is the ratio of change between the pre-procedure measure and the stated timepoint measure.
Between baseline and 2 years
Changes in Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: Between baseline and 3 years
The changes in thigh brachial index is the ratio of change between the pre-procedure measure and the stated timepoint measure.
Between baseline and 3 years
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Time Frame: Pre-procedure
Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best). The highest possible score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity.
Pre-procedure
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Time Frame: 1 month
Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best). The highest possible score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity.
1 month
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Time Frame: 9 months
Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best). The highest possible score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity.
9 months
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Time Frame: 2 years
Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best). The highest possible score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity.
2 years
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Time Frame: 3 years
Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best). The highest possible score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity.
3 years
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 years

Change in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category:

Worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category:

Deterioration (an increase) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category by at least two categories from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement or to a category 5 or 6.

Improved Rutherford Becker Clinical Category:

An improvement (a decrease) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category of at least one category from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement.

Baseline and 2 years
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 years

Change in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category:

Worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category:

Deterioration (an increase) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category by at least two categories from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement or to a category 5 or 6.

Improved Rutherford Becker Clinical Category:

An improvement (a decrease) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category of at least one category from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement.

Baseline and 3 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Time Frame: 1 month and 9 months
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years.Target lesion revascularization (TLR) is defined as any revascularization at the target lesion with or without evidence of target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by Duplex ultrasonography (DUS) or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion).
1 month and 9 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Time Frame: 18 months
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) is defined as any revascularization at the target lesion with or without evidence of target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion).
18 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Time Frame: 2 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) is defined as any revascularization at the target lesion with or without evidence of target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion).
2 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Time Frame: 3 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) is defined as any revascularization at the target lesion with or without evidence of target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion).
3 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)
Time Frame: 18 months
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Clinically-driven TLR is defined as: Revascularization of the stent with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion, and target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography.) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a PTA balloon or stent into a study stent, that has <50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel).
18 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)
Time Frame: 2 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Clinically-driven TLR is defined as: Revascularization of the stent with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion, and target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography.) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a PTA balloon or stent into a study stent, that has <50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel).
2 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)
Time Frame: 3 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Clinically-driven TLR is defined as: Revascularization of the stent with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion, and target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography.) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a PTA balloon or stent into a study stent, that has <50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel).
3 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 1 month and 9 months
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) is defined as any revascularization of the target vessel, outside of the target lesion, with or without evidence of diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target vessel).
1 month and 9 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 18 months
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) is defined as any revascularization of the target vessel, outside of the target lesion, with or without evidence of diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target vessel).
18 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 2 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) is defined as any revascularization of the target vessel, outside of the target lesion, with or without evidence of diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target vessel).
2 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 3 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) is defined as any revascularization of the target vessel, outside of the target lesion, with or without evidence of diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target vessel).
3 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (CD-TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 1 month and 9 months
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization is defined as revascularization of the target vessel (outside the target lesion) with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker clinical category that is clearly referable to the target vessel, and diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography).
1 month and 9 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 18 months
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization is defined as revascularization of the target vessel (outside the target lesion) with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker clinical category that is clearly referable to the target vessel, and diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography)
18 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 2 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization is defined as revascularization of the target vessel (outside the target lesion) with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker clinical category that is clearly referable to the target vessel, and diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography).
2 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically DrivenTarget Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 3 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization is defined as revascularization of the target vessel (outside the target lesion) with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker clinical category that is clearly referable to the target vessel, and diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography).
3 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Extremity Revascularization (TER) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 1 month and 9 months
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target extremity revascularization (TER) is defined as any revascularization of a target extremity vessel (distal to the superior border of the inguinal ligament on the ipsilateral side) with or without evidence of vessel diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, and with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category).
1 month and 9 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Extremity Revascularization (TER) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 18 months
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target extremity revascularization (TER) is defined as any revascularization of a target extremity vessel (distal to the superior border of the inguinal ligament on the ipsilateral side) with or without evidence of vessel diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, and with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category).
18 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Extremity Revascularization (TER) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 2 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target extremity revascularization (TER) is defined as any revascularization of a target extremity vessel (distal to the superior border of the inguinal ligament on the ipsilateral side) with or without evidence of vessel diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, and with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category).
2 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Extremity Revascularization (TER) for the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 3 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target extremity revascularization (TER) is defined as any revascularization of a target extremity vessel (distal to the superior border of the inguinal ligament on the ipsilateral side) with or without evidence of vessel diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, and with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category).
3 years
Primary Stent Patency
Time Frame: 2 years
Absence of in-stent restenosis of the target lesion (≥50%) as determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram and without interval reintervention since the initial study procedure
2 years
Primary Stent Patency
Time Frame: 3 years
Absence of in-stent restenosis of the target lesion (≥50%) as determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram and without interval reintervention since the initial study procedure
3 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Death (All Cause)
Time Frame: 18 months
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years.
18 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Death (All Cause)
Time Frame: 2 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years.
2 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Death (All Cause)
Time Frame: 3 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years.
3 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Myocardial Infarction (MI)
Time Frame: 1 month and 9 months
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. The term myocardial infarction should be used when there is evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia.
1 month and 9 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Myocardial Infarction (MI)
Time Frame: 18 months
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. The term myocardial infarction should be used when there is evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia.
18 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Myocardial Infarction (MI)
Time Frame: 2 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. The term myocardial infarction should be used when there is evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia.
2 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Myocardial Infarction (MI)
Time Frame: 3 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. The term myocardial infarction should be used when there is evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia.
3 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Major) of the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 1 month and 9 months
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. The removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this study, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb(s) that was/were treated. A major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle.
1 month and 9 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Major) of the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 18 months
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. The removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this study, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb(s) that was/were treated. A major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle.
18 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Major) of the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 2 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. The removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this study, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb(s) that was/were treated. A major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle.
2 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Major) of the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 3 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. The removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this study, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb(s) that was/were treated. A major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle.
3 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Embolic Events
Time Frame: 1 month and 9 months
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Embolism is the formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery.
1 month and 9 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Embolic Events
Time Frame: 18 months
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Embolism is the formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery.
18 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Embolic Events
Time Frame: 2 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1 and 9 months and at 2 and 3 years. Embolism is the formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery.
2 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Embolic Events
Time Frame: 3 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1 and 9 months and at 2 and 3 years. Embolism is the formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery.
3 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Minor) of the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 1 month and 9 months
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. The removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this study, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb(s) that was/were treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle.
1 month and 9 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Minor) of the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 18 months
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. The removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this study, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb(s) that was/were treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle.
18 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Minor) of the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 2 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. The removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this study, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb(s) that was/were treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle.
2 years
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Minor) of the Treated Limb(s)
Time Frame: 3 years
Outcome measure analyzed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. The removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this study, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb(s) that was/were treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle.
3 years
Stent Thrombosis
Time Frame: 1 month
Defined as a total occlusion documented by duplex ultrasound and/or arteriography at the stent site with or without symptoms that occurs ≤ 30 days post index procedure.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tony S. Das, MD, Presbyterian Heart Institute, Dallas, TX
  • Principal Investigator: Manish Mehta, MD, MPH, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

July 18, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 8, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Vascular Disease

Clinical Trials on Omnilink Elite™ Peripheral Balloon-Expandable Stent System

3
Subscribe