A Study of Treatment Preference During Cheek Contouring Comparing Restylane® SubQ With and Without the Addition of Lidocaine Hydrochloride

August 24, 2022 updated by: Galderma R&D

A Randomised, Subject-blinded Study of Treatment Preference During Cheek Contouring Comparing Restylane® SubQ With and Without the Addition of Lidocaine Hydrochloride 0.3%

The objectives of this study are to evaluate the pain-relieving effect and safety of adding lidocaine hydrochloride to Restylane SubQ and to evaluate the esthetic improvement obtained. The study products will be administered in the cheek.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Restylane SubQ gel is intended to be used for facial tissue augmentation. The lidocaine content is designed to reduce the subject's pain during treatment. The objectives of this split-face designed study are to evaluate the pain-relieving effect and safety of adding lidocaine hydrochloride to Restylane SubQ and to evaluate the esthetic improvement obtained with the dermal filler using the global esthetic improvement scale (GEIS).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden, 115 42
        • Akademikliniken
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 113 24
        • Plastikkirurggruppen
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 114 36
        • ZMedical

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older.
  • Intent to undergo contouring of both cheeks with 1.5 to 2 ml Restylane SubQ per cheek.
  • Sufficient symmetry of the face in order to ensure similar volume to be injected, similar injection technique and time for injection.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Surgery in the midface including aesthetic facial surgical therapy, sinus surgery or dental root surgery within the past 12 months.
  • Chronic infection in head and neck region.
  • Ongoing infections in mouth.
  • Tendency for edema, puffiness or swelling over the zygomatic prominence.
  • Active skin disease, inflammation or related conditions, such as infection, psoriasis and herpes zoster near or on the area to be treated.
  • Previous hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid or local anesthetics.
  • Concomitant anticoagulant therapy and therapy with inhibitors of platelet aggregation within 10 days prior to treatment, or a history of bleeding disorders.
  • Cancerous or pre-cancerous lesions in the area to be treated.
  • Previous tissue augmenting therapy in the area to be treated with non-permanent filler, laser treatment, or chemical peeling during the last 6 months.
  • Permanent implant placed in the area to be treated.
  • Reduced sensibility in the facial region e.g. due to trauma, facial pareses, previous tissue augmenting therapy, aesthetic facial surgical therapy, laser treatment, or peeling.
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding.
  • Participation in any other clinical study within 30 days prior to inclusion.
  • Other condition preventing the subject to entering the study in the Investigator's opinion e.g. subjects not likely to avoid other facial cosmetic treatments below the level of the upper orbital rim, subjects anticipated to be unreliable or incapable of understanding the VAS assessment, insufficient tissue support or cover of the treatment area.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Restylane SubQ
Treatment with up to 2 ml of the product
OTHER: Restylane SubQ Lidocaine
Treatment with up to 2 ml of the product

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Subjects Who Assessed Treatment With Restylane SubQ Lidocaine as Least Painful.
Time Frame: When injection of both cheeks were completed
When injection of both cheeks was completed, the subject was asked which treatment was least painful (right cheek/left cheek/both cheeks alike).
When injection of both cheeks were completed

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subject Pain Assessment by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 15 and 120 Minutes After Treatment.
Time Frame: 15 and 120 minutes
Pain was assessed during the first 2 hours after the initial injection of the study products using a 100 mm VAS. The endpoints of the scale were "no pain" (0 mm) and "worst possible pain" (100 mm). Pain was assessed at the time points 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after injection.
15 and 120 minutes
Percentage of Improved Subjects at 2 Weeks After Treatment as Assessed by Use of Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Esthetic improvement was evaluated by using Global Esthetic Improvement Scale. GEIS was evaluated by comparing current photos with pre-treatment photos and using a 5-graded scale (worse/no change/somewhat improved/much improved/very much improved). A clinically significant global esthetic improvement was defined as a score of somewhat improved, much improved or very much improved. GEIS was assessed by the Investigator and the subject. Each cheek/study product was evaluated separately. GEIS was assessed at the time points 2 weeks, 3 months, 2 weeks after re-treatment and 6, 9 and 12 months after first treatment.
2 weeks
Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Step Improvement on Medicis Midface Volume Scale (MMVS) at 2 Weeks
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The severity of midface volume loss or midface contour deficiency was assessed by the investigators using a 4-graded scale, Medicis Midface Volume Scale -MMVS (1, fairly full; 2, mild loss of fullness; 3, moderate loss, slight hollowing; and 4, substantial loss, clearly apparent hollowing). Each score were exemplified by photographic images on the scale. A one grade decrease in score from screening was defined as a treatment success/improvement.The efficacy in terms of Medicis Midface Volume Scale (MMVS) was assessed by the Investigator per treatment group. The two cheeks were evaluated separately. MMVS was assessed at the time points 2 weeks, 3 months, 2 weeks after re-treatment and 6, 9 and 12 months after first treatment.
2 weeks
Number of Subjects Reporting at Least 1 Diary Complaint Related to the Cheek Treated With Restylane SubQ and Restylane SubQ Lidocaine Respectively After Initial Treatment.
Time Frame: 14 days
A subject diary was completed for 14 days following the initial treatment and the optional re-treatment at the 3-month visit. Each subject was asked to record the presence of bruising, redness, swelling, pain, tenderness and itching.
14 days
Number of Subjects Reporting Adverse Event
Time Frame: Up to 12 months

Adverse Events (AEs) were collected by open questioning, information obtained from signs and symptoms detected during examination, observed by the study personnel or spontaneous reports from the subjects.

All subjects were injected with Restylane SubQ in one cheek and Restylane SubQ Lidocaine in the contralateral cheek.

Up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Per Hedén, M.D., Akademikliniken, Storängsvägen 10, 115 42 Stockholm

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 12, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Facial Tissue Augmentation

Clinical Trials on Restylane SubQ

Subscribe