Evaluation of Oxidative Stress Induced by Iron Injection in Healthy Volunteers and Critical Care Patients (SOFI)

August 13, 2013 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Evaluation of Oxidative Stress Induced by Iron Injection in Healthy Volunteers Versus Critical Care Patients

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pro-oxidant toxicity of iron injections in critically ill patients and in healthy volunteers. The investigators hypothesize that the inflammatory state of critically ill patients will reduce the oxydative stress induced by iron injections, compared to the one induced in healthy volunteers. It will be an open "proof-of-concept" study aimed at evaluating iron toxicity in critically ill patients (n=40) as compared to healthy volunteers (n=40).

The investigators will compare the oxidative stress (principal judgment criteria= 8-iso-PGF2α) following a 100 mg injection of iron (at T0, T2, T6 and T24 hours post injection) in both groups and the investigators will compare the effect of repeated injections in the critically ill patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Anemia is frequent among critically ill patients, with 60% of the patients being anemic at admission and more than 80% at discharge. This anemia is associated with an increased MORBI-mORTALITY. However, therapeutic options, mainly transfusion and erythropoietin, are disappointing. There is a remaining therapeutic option, iron injection, which has not been fully evaluated because of potential restrictions: inflammation may prevent its efficacy, and iron could be toxic, notably through the generation of oxidative stress. Our research is aimed at exploring the benefit of iron treatment in the critical care anemia.

The investigators already demonstrated in a MURIN model of critical care anemia that the master regulator of iron metabolism, hepcidin, is repressed and that iron can be mobilized from the stores despite inflammation. In addition, in an observational human study, the investigators reported that 25% of critically ill patients had iron deficiency and low to normal hepcidin levels.

All together, these data indicate that iron therapy may be beneficial in this situation. In the present study, the investigators evaluate the toxicity of iron in that context of critical care anemia. Iron, especially non-transferrin bound iron, is known to induce the generation of oxygen-derived free radicals through the Fenton reaction. However, the generation of oxidative stress secondary to iron injection has not been investigated in the critically ill. In our animal model, preliminary data indicate that the production of oxidative stress in the serum following iron injection may be prevented by inflammation.

Objectives: To evaluate the pro-oxidant toxicity of iron injections in critically ill patients and in healthy volunteers. The investigators hypothesize that the oxidative stress will be reduced in critically ill as compared to healthy volunteers

Human study : It will be an open "proof-of-concept" study aiming at evaluating iron toxicity in critically ill patients (n=40) as compared to healthy volunteers (n=40).

The investigators will compare the oxidative stress (principal judgment criteria= 8-iso-PGF2α) following a 100 mg injection of iron (at T0, T2, T6 and T24 hours post injection) in both groups and the investigators will compare the effect of repeated injections in the critically ill patients.

Perspectives:

This study should confirm that iron does not produce more oxidant stress in critically ill patients than in healthy volunteers. The animal study should help to precise the efficacy of this treatment, in addition to its toxicity. All these results will help to design a phase III randomized study of intravenous iron in critically ill anemic patients

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75018
        • CHU BICHAT-Claude BERNARD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Man or woman hospitalized in critical care unit,
  • between 18 and 90 years old
  • clinical examination completed
  • written consent from the patient or a patient's relative depending on the awareness of the patient
  • an iron injection has been prescribed by the responsible physician to the patient
  • anemia defined as hemoglobin level ≤11 g/dl
  • iron deficiency define by at least one of the following criteria :

    • ferritin < 100 μg/l
    • ferritin between 100 and 300 μg/l with transferrin saturation < 20%,
    • soluble transferrin receptor (RsTf) ≥1,4 mg/l,
    • ratio RsTf/log(ferritin) ≥0,7,
    • blood loss ≥ 1 blood weight.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • do not subscribe to the french health insurance program
  • Pregnancy or nursing
  • past medical history of iron overload or disfunction in iron metabolism (= primary or secondary hemochromatosis)
  • Recent bacteremia defined as positive in the 48 hours preceding the injection. Having a non positive hemoculture is not an exclusion criteria
  • Suspicion of a novel current infection defined by a new fever with temperature over >38°5 for at least three times during the last 48hours. A persisting fever for more than 48 hours without argument for a new infection is not an exclusion criteria.
  • known allergia to the iron- hydroxide complex or one of the excipient
  • active chronic alcoholism
  • oral iron treatment during the last 24 hours. Usage of antioxidant (vitamin C, vitamin E) within the 24 hours preceding the iron injection.
  • person participating to another clinical trial or being in the exclusion phase of a clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: critical care patients venofer
Critically ill patients are injected with Venofer (ferric hydroxide sucrose) 100mg IV in one hour (in critically ill patients the injection could be repeated on day 2 (200mg) and 4 (100mg) depending on treatment
100mg IV in one hour (in critically ill patients the injection could be repeated on day 2 (200mg) and 4 (100mg) depending on treatment
Other Names:
  • iron (ferric hydroxide sucrose) injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
serum 8-iso-PGF2α
Time Frame: 0 hours
oxidative stress
0 hours
serum 8-iso-PGF2α
Time Frame: 2 hours
oxidative stress
2 hours
serum 8-iso-PGF2α
Time Frame: 6 hours
oxidative stress
6 hours
serum 8-iso-PGF2α
Time Frame: 24 hours
oxidative stress
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Advanced Oxidized Protein Product
Time Frame: 0 hours
oxidative stress
0 hours
Advanced Oxidized Protein Product
Time Frame: 2 hours
oxidative stress
2 hours
Advanced Oxidized Protein Product
Time Frame: 6 hours
oxidative stress
6 hours
Advanced Oxidized Protein Product
Time Frame: 24 hours
oxidative stress
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sigismond Lasocki, MD PhD, University Hospital, Angers

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

September 30, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 14, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2013

Last Verified

August 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P101104
  • 2011-000819-10 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on critical care patients venofer

Subscribe