Tapentadol Versus Oxycodone - a Mechanism-based Treatment Approach in Neuropathic Pain

December 17, 2024 updated by: Ralf Baron, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein

Phase 4 Study of Tapentadol vs Oxycodone in Neuropathic Pain

The purpose of this study is to elucidate whether the additional mechanism of analgesia, i.e. reuptake inhibition of norepinephrine, of tapentadol leads to a change in different pain signs and symptoms in comparison to oxycodone.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Schleswig Holstein
      • Kiel, Schleswig Holstein, Germany, 24105
        • Division for Neurological Pain Research and Therapy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • thermal or mechanical hyperalgesia
  • chronic neuropathic pain (NRS => 6)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-specific

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: oxycodone
tapentadol pr 100-500 mg oxycodone cr 20-120mg
Other Names:
  • Palexia
Active Comparator: tapentadol
tapentadol pr 100-500 mg oxycodone cr 20-120mg
Other Names:
  • Palexia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mechanical Pain Threshold (MPT)
Time Frame: day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

Change of Mechanical Pain Threshold from baseline to V6 The mechanical pain threshold (MPT) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231.

Logarithmically transformed raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement.

(also see Rolke et. al.) A lower z-value indicates an improvement.

day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)
Heat Pain Threshold (HPT)
Time Frame: day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (10 weeks)

Change of Heat Pain Threshold from V1 to V6 The was Heat Pain Threshold (HPT)measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231.

Raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement.

(also see Rolke et. al.) A lower z-value indicates an improvement.

day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (10 weeks)
Wind-Up Ratio (WUR)
Time Frame: day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (10 weeks)

Change of Wind-Up Ratio from V1 to V6 The Wind-Up Ratio (WUR) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231.

Logarithmically transformed raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement.

(also see Rolke et. al.) A lower z-value indicates an improvement.

day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (10 weeks)
Cold Pain Threshold (CPT)
Time Frame: day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (10 weeks)

Change of Cold Pain Threshold from baseline to V6 The Cold Pain Threshold (CPT) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231.

Raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement.

(also see Rolke et. al.) A lower z-value indicates an improvement.

day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (10 weeks)
Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)
Time Frame: day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

Change of Pressure Pain Threshold from V1 to V6 The Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231.

Logarithmically transformed raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement.

(also see Rolke et. al.) A lower z-value indicates an improvement.

day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)
Mechanical Pain Sensitivity (MPS)
Time Frame: day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

Change of Mechanical Pain Sensitivity from V1 to V6 The Mechanical Pain Sensitivity (MPS) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231.

Logarithmically transformed raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement.

(also see Rolke et. al.) A lower z-value indicates an improvement.

day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)
Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia (DMA)
Time Frame: day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

Change of Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia from V1 to V6 The Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia (DMA) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). "Subjects were asked to give a pain rating for each stimulus on a '0-100' numerical rating scale ('0' indicating "no pain", and '100' indicating "most intense pain imaginable")." See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231.

A lower score indicates an improvement.

day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)
Pain Upon Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)
Change of pain upon Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0 = no pain at all; 10 = maximum pain imaginable) from V1 to V6
day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cold Detection Threshold (CDT)
Time Frame: day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (10 weeks)

Change of Cold Detection Threshold from V1 to V6 The Cold Detection Threshold (CDT) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231.

Raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement.

(also see Rolke et. al.). A higher z-value indicates an improvement.

day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (10 weeks)
Warmth Detection Threshold (WDT)
Time Frame: day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

Change of Warmth Detection Threshold from V1 to V6 The Warmth Detection Threshold (WDT) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231.

Raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement.

(also see Rolke et. al.). A higher z-value indicates an improvement.

day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)
Thermal Sensory Limen (TSL)
Time Frame: day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

Change of Thermal Sensory Limen from V1 to V6 The Thermal Sensory Limen (TSL) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231.

Logarithmically trasnformed raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement.

(also see Rolke et. al.). A higher z-value indicates an improvement.

day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)
Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT)
Time Frame: day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

Change of Mechanical Detection Threshold from V1 to V6 The Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231.

Logarithmically transformed raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement.

(also see Rolke et. al.). A higher z-value indicates an improvement.

day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)
Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT)
Time Frame: day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

Change of Vibration Detection Threshold from V1 to V6 The Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231.

Raw data were z-transformed by subtracting the mean value of the corresponding reference group followed by a division the respective standard deviation. If the resulting z-value exceeds 1.96, it is outside the 95% confidence interval of the standard normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance, independent of the original units of measurement.

(also see Rolke et. al.). A higher z-value indicates an improvement.

day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)
Paradoxical Heat Sensations (PHS)
Time Frame: day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

Change of Number of Paradoxical Heat Sensations from V1 to V6 The number of Paradoxical Heat Sensations (PHS) was measured according to the established protocol of Deutscher Forschungsverbund Neuropathischer Schmerz (DFNS). See Rolke, R et al. "Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values." Pain vol. 123,3 (2006): 231.

An occurence of up to three paradoxical heat sensations was possible. The number was assessed. A lower number indicates an improvement.

day 0 (baseline) and day 78 (V6; 10 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ralf Baron, Prof. Dr., Head of Unit of Neuropathic Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Clinic Kiel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2011

First Posted (Estimated)

October 24, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Neuropathy

Clinical Trials on tapentadol, oxycodone

Subscribe