- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06807294
Feasibility Testing of a Tai Chi Program for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment (TCT)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, randomized, waitlist-controlled pilot trial to examine the suitability of the virtual Tai Chi program in cancer survivors with CIPN. Tai Chi is a mind-body practice that involves gentle body movements, meditation, and breathing techniques. It has proven to be effective in enhancing balance control and relieving musculoskeletal pains.
This study randomly assigns cancer survivors with CIPN with self-perceived balance difficulties to one of two groups: Group A Tai Chi Group versus Group B Waitlist Group. Randomization means a participant is placed into a study group by chance.
The research study procedures including screening for eligibility, questionnaires, and sensory and functional testing.
Participation in this study is expected to last for up to 12 weeks.
It is expected that about 21 people will take part in this research study.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Ting Bao, MD
- Phone Number: 857-215-2844
- Email: ting_bao@dfci.harvard.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Natalie Viyaran
- Email: natalie_viyaran@dfci.harvard.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
- Recruiting
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
-
Contact:
- Ting Bao, MD
- Phone Number: 857-215-2844
- Email: ting_bao@dfci.harvard.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Ting Bao, MD
-
Contact:
- Peter Wayne, PhD
- Phone Number: 617-732-6271
- Email: pwayne@bwh.harvard.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years old and older
- Cancer survivors with no evidence of disease (cancer);
- Completed neurotoxic chemotherapy, i.e., platinum agents, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, and bortezomib, at least three months before enrollment;
- A CIPN diagnosis based on symptom history, loss of deep tendon reflexes, or presence of symmetrical stocking-glove pain, numbness, or paresthesia;
- Answers "yes" to the following question: "Do you feel as though your balance is affected from experiencing CIPN?" or "Are you afraid of falling as a result of your CIPN?";
- On a stable regimen (no change in past three months) if taking anti-neuropathy or other pain medications;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale score ≤ 2
- Willing to adhere to all study-related procedures, including randomization to the Tai Chi or waitlist group, 2 in-person visits to Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) (one within 2 weeks of enrollment and one at week 12);
- Willing to adhere to requirement that no new pain medication be taken throughout the study period; and
- Individuals receiving endocrine therapy or targeted/antibody therapy, such as trastuzumab, pertuzumab, or immunotherapy, will be eligible to participate.
Exclusion Criteria:
• Patients who have received physical therapy or Tai Chi training, specifically for CIPN, in the past three months.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm A: Tai Chi Treatment Group
14 randomized participants will complete:
|
12-week virtual Tai Chi program with experienced Tai Chi instructor.
Sessions will be conducted via the HIPPA-compliant teleconference platform, Zoom.
|
|
No Intervention: Arm B: Waitlist Control Group
7 randomized participants will complete:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Enrollment Rate for the Tai Chi Program
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The intervention is considered feasible if 21 participants are enrolled within the first 6 months of the study period.
|
6 months
|
|
Assessment Completion Rate
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The intervention is considered feasible if 75% of all evaluable participants, 16 out of 21, complete the biobehavioral assessments during the intervention period.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Session Completion Rate
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The intervention is considered feasible if 62% of participants in the intervention arm, 9 out of 14, attend at least 80% or 20 of the 24 online sessions.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Score
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Assessed by the Acceptability of the Intervention Measure (AIM), a 4-item measure rated on a 5-point Likert scale with answers ranging from "Completely disagree" to "Completely agree."
A total scores range is 4 to 20 with a higher score indicating greater acceptability.
|
12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Consent Rate (Arm A)
Time Frame: Up to 6 months (based on total accrual duration)
|
Defined as the proportion of participants enrolled out of those eligible for study entry.
|
Up to 6 months (based on total accrual duration)
|
|
Consent Rate (Arm B)
Time Frame: Up to 6 months (based on total accrual duration)
|
Defined as the proportion of participants enrolled out of those eligible for study entry.
|
Up to 6 months (based on total accrual duration)
|
|
Change in Berg Balance Scale (BBS) Score from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm A)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
|
Assessed by the BBS, a 14-item tool to measure participant balance ability.
Each task is scored on a scale from 0 to 4 with a total scores range of 0 to 56.
A higher score indicates better balance.
|
Baseline and 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Berg Balance Scale (BBS) Score from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm B)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
|
Assessed by the BBS, a 14-item tool to measure participant balance ability.
Each task is scored on a scale from 0 to 4 with a total scores range of 0 to 56.
A higher score indicates better balance.
|
Baseline and 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Fall Rate from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm A)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
|
Defined as the number of falls which occur during the intervention period.
A fall is an unplanned descent to the floor with or without injury according to the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) definition.
Falls included are 1) those occurring on a surface where caregivers and clinicians do not expect to find a participant, and 2) falls unassisted or assisted, and 3) falls from rolling off a low bed.
|
Baseline and 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Fall Rate from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm B)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
|
Defined as the number of falls which occurred during the intervention period.
A fall is an unplanned descent to the floor with or without injury according to the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) definition.
Falls included are 1) those occurring on a surface where caregivers and clinicians do not expect to find a participant, and 2) falls unassisted or assisted, and 3) falls from rolling off a low bed.
|
Baseline and 12 weeks
|
|
Change in the Number of Fall-Related Injuries from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm A)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
|
As defined by the NDNQI definitions for fall-related injuries.
Injuries will be recorded by the participant in the supplied home diary and will be summarized descriptively.
|
Baseline and 12 weeks
|
|
Change in the Number of Fall-Related Injuries from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm B)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
|
As defined by the NDNQI definitions for fall-related injuries.
Injuries will be recorded by the participant in the supplied home diary and will be summarized descriptively.
|
Baseline and 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Timed-Up-And-Go (TUG) Test from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm A)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Assessed by the TUG Test.
Participants are instructed to stand up from a chair, walk three meters as quickly and safely as possible, turn around, walk back, and sit down.
The test is timed in seconds, with a longer time indicating worse performance.
Nine seconds is the cutoff for high risk of falls.
|
Baseline to 12 weeks
|
|
Change in TUG Test from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm B)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Assessed by the TUG Test.
Participants are instructed to stand up from a chair, walk three meters as quickly and safely as possible, turn around, walk back, and sit down.
The test is timed in seconds, with a longer time indicating worse performance.
Nine seconds is the cutoff for high risk of falls.
|
Baseline to 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-Short For (BPI-SF) Score from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm A)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Assessed by the BPI-SF, 9-item measure of the severity of pain and pain interference in the 24 hours prior to questionnaire administrations.
A simple numeric rating scale from 0 to 10 is used for item rating, and a total score is the mean of the item ratings.
Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity and greater interference with function.
|
Baseline to 12 weeks
|
|
Change in BPI-SF Score from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm B)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Assessed by the BPI-SF, 9-item measure of the severity of pain and pain interference in the 24 hours prior to questionnaire administrations.
A simple numeric rating scale from 0 to 10 is used for item rating, and a total score is the mean of the item ratings.
Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity and greater interference with function.
|
Baseline to 12 weeks
|
|
Change in the Neurotoxicity (Ntx) Subscale Score from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm A)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Assessed by the Ntx Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group (FACT/GOG) questionnaire.
The Ntx Subscale is an 11-item measure of symptoms in the 7 days prior to questionnaire administration.
Answers are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 "Not at all" to 4 "Very much" with a total scores range of 0 to 44.
Higher scores represent higher functioning and fewer or less severe CIPN symptoms.
|
Baseline to 12 weeks
|
|
Change in the Neurotoxicity (Ntx) Subscale Score from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm B)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
|
Assessed by the Ntx Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group (FACT/GOG) questionnaire.
The Ntx Subscale is an 11-item measure of symptoms in the 7 days prior to questionnaire administration.
Answers are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 "Not at all" to 4 "Very much" with a total scores range of 0 to 44.
Higher scores represent higher functioning and fewer or less severe CIPN symptoms.
|
Baseline and 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Tactile Threshold Value from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm A)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
|
This will be measured using a set of 20 Von Frey monofilaments.
With participant's eyes closed, and starting at the smallest size filament, the clinical research coordinator (CRC) will touch the testing site at a 90-degree angle to the site surface until the filament bends for a one second duration.
The CRC will continue this with ascending filament size in order until the participant reports feeling a touch sensation at the testing location.
The force at which touch is perceived will be recorded as the tactile threshold.
Tactile threshold will be assessed at the dorsum of the interphalangeal joint of the right and left big toes.
Value will be recorded as the average of three readings.
|
Baseline and 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Tactile Threshold Value from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm B)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
|
This will be measured using a set of 20 Von Frey monofilaments.
With participant's eyes closed, and starting at the smallest size filament, the clinical research coordinator (CRC) will touch the testing site at a 90-degree angle to the site surface until the filament bends for a one second duration.
The CRC will continue this with ascending filament size in order until the participant reports feeling a touch sensation at the testing location.
The force at which touch is perceived will be recorded as the tactile threshold.
Tactile threshold will be assessed at the dorsum of the interphalangeal joint of the right and left big toes.
Value will be recorded as the average of three readings.
|
Baseline and 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Vibration Threshold Value from Baseline to 12 weeks (Arm A)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
|
This will be assessed using a handheld biothesiometer and the amplitude of vibration will be gradually increased (1 volt/second) until the sensation of vibration is first perceived by the participant.
The average of three perception thresholds at the dorsal interphalangeal joint of the dominant big toe will be recorded as the vibration threshold.
|
Baseline to 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Vibration Threshold Value from Baseline to 12 weeks (Arm B)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
|
This will be assessed using a handheld biothesiometer and the amplitude of vibration will be gradually increased (1 volt/second) until the sensation of vibration is first perceived by the participant.
The average of three perception thresholds at the dorsal interphalangeal joint of the dominant big toe will be recorded as the vibration threshold.
|
Baseline to 12 weeks
|
|
Change in the Short Falls Efficacy Scale - International (Short FES-I) from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm A)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Assessed by the Short FES-I, a 7-item measure of concerns about falls during daily activities.
Answers are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 "Not at all concerned" to 4 "Very concerned" with a total scores range of 7 to 28.
A higher score represents greater participant concern.
|
Baseline to 12 weeks
|
|
Change in the Short Falls Efficacy Scale - International (Short FES-I) from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm B)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
|
Assessed by the Short FES-I, a 7-item measure of concerns about falls during daily activities.
Answers are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 "Not at all concerned" to 4 "Very concerned" with a total scores range of 7 to 28.
A higher score represents greater participant concern.
|
Baseline to 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Functional Reach Test from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm A)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
|
The FRT test is used to quantify balance ability.
A participant is instructed to flex the test arm forward to 90 degrees and to reach forward as far as possible before taking a step.
The reach is determined by the total excursion of the third metacarpal from the starting point (with the handheld in a fist) to the point just before balance is lost.
The final score is the average of three measurements.
|
Baseline to 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Functional Reach Test from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm B)
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
|
The FRT test is used to quantify balance ability.
A participant is instructed to flex the test arm forward to 90 degrees and to reach forward as far as possible before taking a step.
The reach is determined by the total excursion of the third metacarpal from the starting point (with the handheld in a fist) to the point just before balance is lost.
The final score is the average of three measurements.
|
Baseline to 12 weeks
|
|
Change in balance, strength, gait health and mobility factors from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm A)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
|
Assessed by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the incidence of falls, fall-related injuries, the Functional Reach Test (FRT) to measure dynamic balance and muscle flexibility (lower scores indicating higher fall risk), the Single Leg Stance Test (SLS) to evaluate static balance with eyes open and closed (abnormal values indicating balance impairment), the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, the 30-second Chair Stand (30CS) test to assess motor performance (with lower TUG scores and higher 30CS scores reflecting better functional balance, strength, and endurance), and gait speed measurement across an 8-meter hallway under three conditions (quiet walking, fast speed, and cognitive dual task) at baseline and after 12 weeks of Tai Chi training.
|
Baseline and 12 weeks
|
|
Change in balance, strength, gait health and mobility factors from Baseline to 12 Weeks (Arm B)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
|
Assessed by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the incidence of falls, fall-related injuries, the Functional Reach Test (FRT) to measure dynamic balance and muscle flexibility (lower scores indicating higher fall risk), the Single Leg Stance Test (SLS) to evaluate static balance with eyes open and closed (abnormal values indicating balance impairment), the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, the 30-second Chair Stand (30CS) test to assess motor performance (with lower TUG scores and higher 30CS scores reflecting better functional balance, strength, and endurance), and gait speed measurement across an 8-meter hallway under three conditions (quiet walking, fast speed, and cognitive dual task) at baseline and after 12 weeks of Tai Chi training.
|
Baseline and 12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ting Bao, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 24-399
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neuropathy
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNot yet recruiting
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingChemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy | Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy | Refractory Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
-
Arash Asher, MDVoxxLifeCompletedNeuropathy | Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy | Neuropathy;PeripheralUnited States
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstitutePaxman Coolers LimitedRecruitingChemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy | CIPN - Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy | Taxane-Induced Peripheral NeuropathyUnited States
-
Endeavor HealthOctapharma USA, Inc.RecruitingSmall Fiber Neuropathy | Autoimmune Small Fiber Neuropathy | Inflammatory Polyneuropathy | Immune-Mediated NeuropathyUnited States
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterPhoenix Neurological Associates, LTDCompletedSmall Fiber Neuropathy | Idiopathic Peripheral NeuropathyUnited States
-
Centre Hospitalier de BlignyHopital Forcilles; AgenTNot yet recruitingTaxane-induced Peripheral Neuropathy | Chemotherapy Induced Neuropathic Pain | Neuropathy Toxic | Oxaliplatin Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Cancer Patients
-
Nihon Pharmaceutical Co., LtdCompletedMultifocal Motor NeuropathyJapan
-
University of AarhusCompletedMultifocal Motor NeuropathyDenmark
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedDiabetic Neuropathies | Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy | Painful Diabetic Neuropathy | Autonomic Neuropathy | Diabetic Polyneuropathy | Small Fiber NeuropathyEgypt
Clinical Trials on Tai Chi Program
-
Jinan University GuangzhouChaozhou Special Education SchoolActive, not recruitingAutism Spectrum Disorder (ASDChina
-
West Virginia UniversityNot yet recruitingCervical Myelopathy | Fall Risk | Balance Assessment
-
National Yang Ming UniversityCompleted
-
Kwong Wah HospitalCompletedChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseChina
-
Université de SherbrookeUniversity of Toronto; Université de MontréalCompleted
-
Harvard University Faculty of MedicineBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Brigham and Women's HospitalCompleted
-
Hong Kong Baptist UniversitySun Yat-sen University; Nanjing Normal UniversityCompleted
-
Lidian ChenPeking University Third HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)Completed
-
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineNot yet recruitingQuality of Life | Dialysis; Complications | Chinese Medicine