N-methyl-D-aspartic Acid (NMDA) and Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia

NMDA and Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia

Persistent neurocognitive deficits are a major cause of severe disability and impaired long-term psychosocial outcome in schizophrenia (SZ). In particular, within the auditory system, early deficits such as the behavioral and neurophysiological ability to match tones that vary in pitch correlate with impairments in auditory emotion recognition (affective prosody) and general functioning, suggesting that interventions aimed at remediating sensory-level dysfunction may lead to significant improvement in higher order cognitive/emotion processes. Efforts to ameliorate cognitive deficits in schizophrenia utilize either pharmacological agents or behavioral treatments such as cognitive remediation, which generally focus on higher order processes, and not on the early sensory processing which may be key to functioning.

Numerous pharmacological agents have been proposed, but accumulating evidence suggests that dysfunction of the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor may be one of the root causes of schizophrenia, including sensory and cognitive impairments, suggesting that an NMDA based treatment may be efficacious in reversing these deficits. D-Cycloserine, a synthetic partial NMDA agonist has been used in anxiety disorders to augment learning in cognitive remediation. Because of a tendency to act as an NMDA antagonist at higher doses D-cycloserine is not effective in schizophrenia. In contrast, D-serine (DSR), is a full agonist, and is therefore more ideal for enhancing NMDA function and cognitive remediation. While previous use of DSR was limited by safety concerns in rodents,the investigators have shown that it can safely be used at doses of 60 mg/kg and, moreover, demonstrates converging improvement in symptomatic, cognitive and sensory-based measures in schizophrenia. Evidence also suggests that NMDA receptor dysfunction in schizophrenia may be relative, rather than absolute, suggesting that the enhanced practice of a cognitive remediation paradigm might be able to overcome reduced plasticity and treat cognitive dysfunction.

This project will be the first to combine the NMDA based and sensory-based cognitive remediation (SBR) approaches, and will utilize not only DSR, but also a tone matching SBR paradigm has been shown to enhance learning in healthy controls, as well as a paradigm designed to augment visual motion detection. This study will pilot these interventions in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover design that will use neurophysiology together with cognitive tests to explore the effects on brain activity and cognitive function in 16 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The investigators hypothesize that DSR+SBR will lead to improvement. Subjects will have an initial visit to establish baseline performance on cognitive tasks before returning for 3 visits when they will receive blinded study medication [60 mg/kg of DSR (2 days) or placebo (1 day)] in a randomized order. The procedures on the treatment days will include the SBR paradigm and pre/post neurophysiological measurements. Primary outcomes are improvements in neurophysiologic and behavioral sensory processing. The main goal is to establish the preliminary efficacy to use in a follow-up multi-dose study utilizing a multiple session SBR R01 application.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

16

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Orangeburg, New York, United States, 10962
        • Recruiting
        • Nathan Kline Insitute for Psychiatric Research
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Daniel C Javitt, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Joshua T Kantrowitz, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 to 64 years old, IQ≥85 and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) < or =60. All oral and depot antipsychotics (with the exception of clozapine) are allowable.
  • Patients must be on their antipsychotic medication for 1 month and stable on dose of antipsychotic and adjunctive medications for 2 weeks prior to study entry.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Include a history of neurological visual or hearing impairment, active suicidal ideation on the Calgary Depression Scale (CDS), current alcohol or drug abuse (<1 month) or substance dependence (<4 months).
  • All women of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at the baseline visit.
  • We require an IQ of greater or equal to 85 to ensure that subjects will have a capacity to learn.
  • In our cross-sectional studies, we have observed an IQ greater than 85 in over 90% of candidates, suggesting that this is not an overly restrictive criterion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: D-serine 60 mg/kg
double blind dose of d-serine
Subjects will then undergo three treatment visits. Each visit will begin with a pre treatment MMN/visual motion paradigm. Subjects will then receive DSR (60 mg/kg) or placebo and begin a one-hour SBR intervention. SBR will begin approximately 30 minutes after drug administration, to coincide with peak serum DSR level. Finally, to evaluate the effects of SBR and NMDA treatment on neurophysiology, subjects will complete a post treatment ERP paradigm. Treatment days will be separated by 1 week to reduce carryover effect. To increase power, each subject will undergo two DSR treatment days and 1 placebo day, with the placebo day selected randomly from among the three treatment days, in counter balanced order. Treatment assignment (drug and SBR) will be double blinded. Follow-up cognitive and safety measures will also be completed on the final treatment day.
Every subject will receive sensory based remediation on each treatment visit: Three 80-tone pair blocks will be used per session (~1 hour with breaks). To minimize practice effects, we will use a different base tone for each treatment day (e.g. 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz), also in a randomized counter-balanced order. To assess the improvement over a treatment day, we will record the ratio of the frequencies in all tone pairs. To correct this non-normal distribution we take the natural log of each of these ratios to determine the tone matching threshold.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo D-serine
Every subject will receive sensory based remediation on each treatment visit: Three 80-tone pair blocks will be used per session (~1 hour with breaks). To minimize practice effects, we will use a different base tone for each treatment day (e.g. 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz), also in a randomized counter-balanced order. To assess the improvement over a treatment day, we will record the ratio of the frequencies in all tone pairs. To correct this non-normal distribution we take the natural log of each of these ratios to determine the tone matching threshold.
Subjects will then undergo three treatment visits. Each visit will begin with a pre treatment MMN/visual motion paradigm. Subjects will then receive DSR (60 mg/kg) or placebo and begin a one-hour SBR intervention. SBR will begin approximately 30 minutes after drug administration, to coincide with peak serum DSR level. Finally, to evaluate the effects of SBR and NMDA treatment on neurophysiology, subjects will complete a post treatment ERP paradigm. Treatment days will be separated by 1 week to reduce carryover effect. To increase power, each subject will undergo two DSR treatment days and 1 placebo day, with the placebo day selected randomly from among the three treatment days, in counter balanced order. Treatment assignment (drug and SBR) will be double blinded. Follow-up cognitive and safety measures will also be completed on the final treatment day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tone Matching threshold
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Three 80-tone pair blocks will be used per session (~1 hour with breaks). To minimize practice effects, we will use a different base tone for each treatment day (e.g. 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz), also in a randomized counter-balanced order. To assess the improvement over a treatment day, we will record the ratio of the frequencies in all tone pairs. To correct this non-normal distribution we take the natural log of each of these ratios to determine the tone matching threshold.
3 weeks
Mismatch Negativity (MMN)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
MMN will be obtained independently to pitch stimuli utilizing the same base frequencies as the SBR, (e.g. 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz). Two sessions will be held each day, both before and after study drug/SBR intervention. MMN will be generated using previously published methods. MMN is maximal at frontocentral electrodes (Fz, Cz). For all measures, peak amplitude at frontocentral electrodes within predefined latency range will be primary outcome measure. We primarily evaluate effect of study drug.
3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tone Matching
Time Frame: 3 weeks
This task consists of pairs of 100-ms tones in series, with 500-ms intertone interval. Within each pair, tones are either identical or differed in frequency by specified amounts in each block (2.5%, 5%, 10%, 20%, or 50%). In each block, 12 of the tones are identical and 14 are dissimilar. Tones are derived from 3 reference frequencies (500, 1000, and 2000 Hz) to avoid learning effects.
3 weeks
Auditory Emotion Recognition Task
Time Frame: 3 weeks
The sentences will be scored based on the speaker's intended emotion (happy, sad, angry, fear or neutral). The sentences are semantically neutral and consisted of both statements and questions (i.e., ''It is eleven o'clock'', ''Is it eleven o'clock?'').
3 weeks
Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Assesses severity of positive, negative and cognitive symptoms in SZ
3 weeks
Medical Symptom Inventory (aka Side Effect Checklist)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
designed to assess vital signs and commonly occurring antipsychotic side effects.
3 weeks
MATRICS consensus cognitive battery,
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Improvement is particularly expected in visual and auditory-based measures (verbal memory) as well as composite score.
3 weeks
Contrast sensitivity
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Contrast sensitivity: stimuli consist of sine wave gratings shown side-by-side with a solid gray panel. Contrast is reduced until subjects can no longer tell the grating from the solid gray panel.
3 weeks
The Perceptual Organization Index (POI):
Time Frame: Baseline-final
a component of the WAIS Performance IQ construct and consists of 3 tests: Picture Completion, Matrix Reasoning, and Block Design.
Baseline-final
Emotion in motion
Time Frame: 3 weeks
This is a computerized task that includes videos of faces expressing 4 basic emotions - happiness, sadness, anger, or fear - and neutral expressions.
3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joshua T Kantrowitz, MD, Columbia University/Nathan Kline Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 25, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2012

Last Verified

July 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on D-serine

Subscribe