Accuracy Study of a Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Cuff in Comparison to an Invasive Radial Arterial Blood Pressure

May 6, 2019 updated by: GE Healthcare

Accuracy Study of a Non-Invasive Forearm Blood Pressure Cuff in Comparison to an Invasive Radial Arterial Blood Pressure

The purpose of this study is to establish the performance of a blood pressure cuff. The hypothesis is that the blood pressure reading from the cuff will provide similar blood pressure as a radial artery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Blood pressure reading from the cuff will provide similar blood pressure as a radial artery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Louisville, Colorado, United States, 80027
        • Clinimark

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability to provide written informed consent or have a legally authorized representative provide written informed consent
  • Any volunteer subjects ≥ 18 years of age
  • Subject must have the presence of normal sinus rhythm on ECG
  • Subject will return for follow-up visit from 5 days to 8 days after study procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any subject who is unable to provide written informed consent
  • Any subject with the presence of peripheral vascular disease in either arm
  • Any subject that demonstrates an initial NIBP screening for a blood pressure distribution range that has already been filled.
  • Any subject who cannot tolerate 21 repeated BP measurements
  • Any subjects with clotting or bleeding disorders
  • Any subjects taking medications that are considered anticoagulants or blood thinners (For example, Clopidogrel, Warfarin, Dipyridamole, Aspirin, and Enoxaparin)
  • Any subject who is unable to have arterial line placed in the radial artery
  • Any subject that cannot tolerate 4 fast flushes for the frequency response
  • Any female subjects pregnant or lactating
  • Any subject that has previously participated in this study
  • Any subjects that cannot return 5 to 8 days post study procedure for a follow-up visit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Blood Pressure monitoring
Blood Pressure (BP) monitoring using invasive arterial insertion as a standard reference, and an investigational, non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitoring cuff. Data obtained from the cuff used the SuperSTAT NIBP algorithm and the Classic NIBP algorithm for output.
BP readings from participant using invasive radial arterial line, Non-invasive cuff with SuperSTAT NIBP algorithm, and Non-invasive cuff with Classic NIBP algorithm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance Comparison: NIBP Forearm Cuff Using SuperStat Algorithm vs. Invasive Radial Blood Pressure Reading
Time Frame: Approximately 2 hours
NIBP Forearm cuff systolic and diastolic values using SuperStat algorithm compared to invasive radial blood pressure systolic and diastolic values (both obtained simultaneously).
Approximately 2 hours
Performance Comparison: NIBP Forearm Cuff Using Classic Algorithm vs. Invasive Radial Blood Pressure Reading
Time Frame: Approximately 2 hours
NIBP Forearm cuff systolic and diastolic values using Classic algorithm difference compared to invasive radial blood pressure readings (both readings obtained simultaneously).
Approximately 2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Ransom, MD, Clinimark, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

December 5, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 118.02-2011-GES-0007

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Blood Pressure

Clinical Trials on BP monitoring using two methods

Subscribe