A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of ADX-N05 in the Treatment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness

June 11, 2021 updated by: Jazz Pharmaceuticals

A Four-week, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Cross-over Study of the Safety and Efficacy of ADX-N05 in the Treatment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness

This is a study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ADX-N05 compared to placebo in the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in adults with narcolepsy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
        • Pulmonary Associates
    • Florida
      • Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States, 33707
        • Clinical Research Group of St. Petersburg
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30342
        • Sleep Disorders Center of Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30342
        • NeuroTrials Research, Inc.
      • Macon, Georgia, United States, 31201
        • SleepMed of Central Georgia
    • Maryland
      • Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States, 20815
        • The Center for Sleep and Wake Disorders
    • Ohio
      • Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43623
        • Mercy St. Anne Sleep Disorders Center
    • South Carolina
      • Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29201
        • SleepMed of South Carolina
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
        • Future Search Trials of Neurology
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • Sleep Medicine Associates of Texas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of narcolepsy
  • Good general health
  • Willing and able to comply with the study design and schedule and other requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If female, pregnant or lactating
  • Customary bedtime later than midnight
  • History of significant medical condition, behavioral or psychiatric disorder (including suicidal ideation), or surgical history
  • Any other clinically relevant medical, behavioral or psychiatric disorder other than narcolepsy that is associated with excessive sleepiness
  • History of significant cardiovascular disease
  • Body mass index >34
  • Excessive caffeine use - > 600 mg/day of caffeine or > 6 cups of coffee/day
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse within the past two years
  • Nicotine dependence that has an affect on sleep

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Placebo, Then ADX-N05
Participants first receive a placebo to match ADX-N05 once a day for 2 consecutive weeks (Weeks 1 and 2). They will then receive ADX-N05 150 mg tablet once a day for seven days (Week 3) followed by 300 mg (2 tablets) once a day for seven days (Week 4).
150 mg once a day for seven days followed by 300 mg once a day for seven days
Placebo to match ADX-N05 once a day for 2 consecutive weeks
Placebo Comparator: ADX-N05, Then Placebo
Participants first receive ADX-N05 150 mg tablet once a day for seven days (Week 1) followed by 300 mg (2 tablets) once a day for seven days (Week 2). They will then receive a placebo to match ADX-N05 once a day for 2 consecutive weeks (Weeks 3 and 4).
150 mg once a day for seven days followed by 300 mg once a day for seven days
Placebo to match ADX-N05 once a day for 2 consecutive weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in the Average Sleep Latency Time (in Minutes) as Determined From the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) Following Two Weeks of Treatment With ADX-N05 vs. Two Weeks of Treatment With Placebo
Time Frame: Baseline up to 2 weeks post-dose.
The MWT is a validated objective measure of the ability to stay awake for a defined period of time. The change from baseline in the mean sleep latency from the MWT was the average of sleep latency from the four trials of the MWT.
Baseline up to 2 weeks post-dose.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score During Weeks 1 and 3
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 3 post-dose.
The ESS is a questionnaire intended to measure daytime sleepiness. In this test, participants answer questions with regard to the level of sleepiness they experienced over approximately the 7 days prior to the assessment while performing eight common, non-stimulating activities. The ESS total score range is 1 to 24. Each activity is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from a minimum of "would never doze" to a maximum of "a high chance of dozing." Thus, the ESS scale range is as follows: 0=would never doze, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2=moderate chance of dozing, 3=high chance of dozing; 0 indicates a better outcome, and 3 indicates a worse outcome. A negative mean change value indicates a decrease in score from baseline and an improvement in daytime sleepiness.
Baseline up to Week 3 post-dose.
Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score During Weeks 2 and 4
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 4 post-dose.
The ESS is a questionnaire intended to measure daytime sleepiness. In this test, participants answer questions with regard to the level of sleepiness they experienced over approximately the 7 days prior to the assessment while performing eight common, non-stimulating activities. The ESS total score range is 1 to 24. Each activity is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from a minimum of "would never doze" to a maximum of "a high chance of dozing." Thus, the ESS scale range is as follows: 0=would never doze, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2=moderate chance of dozing, 3=high chance of dozing; 0 indicates a better outcome, and 3 indicates a worse outcome. A negative mean change value indicates a decrease in score from baseline and an improvement in daytime sleepiness.
Baseline up to Week 4 post-dose.
Number of Participants With Improved Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Scores During Weeks 1 and 3
Time Frame: Week 1 and Week 3 post-dose.
The CGI-C scale was completed at Week 1 through 4 visits. The participant was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from a minimum of "Very much improved" to a maximum of "Very much worse." The proportion of participants experiencing at least minimal improvement on the CGI-C was calculated and summarized for each of the two weeks of each of the treatment periods. The CGI-C scale consists of the following ratings: 1-Very Much improved, 2-Much improved, 3-Minimally improved, 4-No change, 5-Minimally worse, 6-Much worse, 7-Very much worse; a rating of 1 indicates a better outcome, and a rating of 7 indicates a worse outcome. Improvement was defined as a CGI-rating of 1, 2, or 3.
Week 1 and Week 3 post-dose.
Number of Participants With Improved Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Scores During Weeks 2 and 4
Time Frame: Week 2 and Week 4 post-dose.
The CGI-C scale was completed at Week 1 through 4 visits. The participant was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from a minimum of "Very much improved" to a maximum of "Very much worse." The proportion of participants experiencing at least minimal improvement on the CGI-C was calculated and summarized for each of the two weeks of each of the treatment periods. The CGI-C scale consists of the following ratings: 1-Very Much improved, 2-Much improved, 3-Minimally improved, 4-No change, 5-Minimally worse, 6-Much worse, 7-Very much worse; a rating of 1 indicates a better outcome, and a rating of 7 indicates a worse outcome. Improvement was defined as a CGI-rating of 1, 2, or 3.
Week 2 and Week 4 post-dose.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

December 6, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Narcolepsy

Clinical Trials on ADX-N05

3
Subscribe