Half-Dose Radiopharmaceutical in Wide Beam Reconstruction (REGA-1102)

January 27, 2016 updated by: Edwin Wu

Feasibility of Half-Dose Radiopharmaceutical Administration Utilizing Wide-Beam Reconstruction

This study is recruiting patients already scheduled for a single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) test. SPECT-MPI is a nuclear imaging technique that uses a radioactive substance, or radiotracer, and special equipment to create three-dimensional (3D) images of the heart. Radiotracer is a radioactive dye that will make the structures of the heart visible and is routinely used to view blood flow in the heart, scan for damaged heart tissue, or assess heart function.

For a routine SPECT-MPI test, the radiotracer is given in one dose at the beginning of the test, followed by taking resting images of the heart. For this study, researchers would like to administer half of the radiotracer, obtain resting images, administer the remainder of the radiotracer and obtain a second set of resting images. Participants will receive the same amount of radioactive material that would normally be given for this test; however, it will be administered in two half-doses. Participation in this study will add about 30 minutes to the time it takes to complete the routine test. The investigators expect to enroll about 160 subjects in this study at Northwestern.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Subjects in this study will proceed to the nuclear cardiology laboratory for their scheduled nuclear stress test. After informed consent is obtained, the study doctor or research staff member will ask detailed questions about the subject's current health, medications and medical history, and the subject's medical chart will be reviewed including results of any previous nuclear images.

For the test, a small catheter (tube) will be placed in a vein in the subject's arm to administer the radioactive imaging agent, Tc-99m sestamibi. Subjects will be given half (1/2) of the normal Tc-99m sestamibi dose and then the study staff will obtain resting images pictures of the heart. After this set of images, the subject will be given the remaining half of the radioactive imaging agent followed by a second set of images.

After this, the subject will then undergo the stress portion of the test in the usual manner as prescribed by the referring physician.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over the age of 18 years
  • Undergoing nuclear stress testing
  • History of myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, heart failure or prior nuclear studies with resting perfusion defects

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling or unable to undergo an additional resting SPECT acquisition
  • Clinical contraindications to nuclear stress testing including acute myocardial infarction

    • For patients undergoing exercise treadmill stress testing:
  • Left bundle branch block or artificial ventricular pacemaker

    • For patients undergoing regadenoson (Lexiscan) stress testing:
  • Moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, second- or third degree atrioventricular block or sinus node disease (unless patients have a functioning artificial pacemaker), known hypersensitivity to aminophylline or adenosine
  • Inability to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Half-dose radiotracer administration
For this study, researchers would like to administer half of the radiotracer, obtain resting images, administer the remainder of the radiotracer and obtain a second set of resting images. Subjects will be given the same amount of radioactive material that would normally be given for this test; however, it will be administered in two ½ doses.
Researchers will administer half of the radiotracer (Cardiolite), obtain resting images, administer the remainder of the radiotracer and obtain a second set of resting images. Subjects will be given the same amount of radioactive material that would normally be given for this test; however, it will be administered in two ½ doses.
Other Names:
  • technetium (Tc-99m) sestamibi, Cardiolite

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sum Rest Score
Time Frame: Baseline
Left ventricular myocardium was divided into standardized 17-segments with 6 equiangular segments in the basal region, 6 equiangular segments in the mid region, 4 equiangular segments in the apical regions, and 1 region in the apex (Cerqueira MD, et al., J Nucl Cardiol 2002;9:240-5). Each segment was scored on a scale from 0 to 4 to indicate the severity of the perfusion defect (0=no perfusion defect; 1=mild perfusion defect; 2=moderate perfusion defect; 3=severe perfusion defect; and 4=absent perfusion). The scores over 17 segments were summed to report the Sum Rest Score (SRS), ie. the greater the SRS, the larger the perfusion defect.
Baseline
Segments With Resting Perfusion Defect
Time Frame: Baseline
Left ventricular myocardium was divided into standardized 17-segments with 6 equiangular segments in the basal region, 6 equiangular segments in the mid region, 4 equiangular segments in the apical regions, and 1 region in the apex (Cerqueira MD, et al., J Nucl Cardiol 2002;9:240-5). Each segment was scored on a scale from 0 to 4 to indicate the severity of the perfusion defect (0=no perfusion defect; 1=mild perfusion defect; 2=moderate perfusion defect; 3=severe perfusion defect; and 4=absent perfusion). The number of segments with a score of 1 or greater were summed to obtain the number of segments with a resting perfusion defect.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Image Quality Score
Time Frame: Baseline
Each reconstructed image was subjectively scored by the expert readers to determine the overall image quality. The Image Quality Score of the reconstructed images were graded on a 4-point scale. (1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; and 4=Excellent).
Baseline
Diagnostic Confidence Score
Time Frame: Baseline
Each reconstructed image was subjectively scored by the expert readers to determine the expert reader's diagnostic confidence in scoring and interpreting the perfusion scores. The Diagnostic Confidence Score of the reconstructed images were graded on a 4-point scale. (1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; and 4=Excellent).
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Edwin Wu, M.D., FACC, Northwestern University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

December 26, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 24, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on Half-dose of the Tc99-m sestamibi (Cardiolite)

Subscribe