Promoting Recovery Processes in Women With Borderline Personality Disorder Using a Dynamic Cognitive Intervention
Promoting Recovery Processes in Women Diagnosed With Borderline Personality Disorder Using a Dynamic Cognitive Intervention
The field of psychiatric rehabilitation focuses on creating a personal narrative and developing coping strategies and environmental supports. The concept of recovery is person-centered and emphasizes the person's ability to change and to live meaningful life. The strengths approach has a central role in the recovery concept, emphasizing the person's abilities and potential. A preserved cognitive ability can be a significant strength in the recovery process.
Research had shown growing support for the use of cognitive-behavioral approaches as the most effective therapy for people with borderline personality disorder, using structured interventions. A central focus in cognitive therapy is the change of maladaptive schemes. The dynamic-cognitive intervention (DCI) is based on the understanding of structural cognitive modifiability and suggests the use of mediated learning in order to enhance sense of competence and develop better psychological coping skills.
The present study will focus on women diagnosed with borderline personality disorder, with normative cognitive ability seen as a strength as opposed to their emotional ability. This study will examine the effects of a Dynamic Cognitive Intervention on recovery measures and on symptoms severity.
The study will include 30 women aged 18-45 years. Participants will be randomly assigned to an intervention group and a control group. All participants will be assessed before and after intervention using Recovery Assessment Scale, Hope Scale and The Brief Symptom Inventory.
The intervention designed for this study is based on the principles of the Dynamic Cognitive Intervention. The intervention tools that will be used include: a. Instrumental Enrichment tools. b. life events analysis. c. Stories, lyrics and movie clips. d. Worksheets. The intervention encompasses 12 sessions of 1.5 hours, with a routine structure.
The results are expected to contribute to the understanding of the impact of a dynamic cognitive intervention in women diagnosed with borderline personality disorder.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Netanya, Israel
- Day Center for Mentally Ill
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women
- Age 18 - 45
- Borderline Personality Disorder, by DSM-V
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current Acute Depressive Episode
- Current Psychotic Episode
- Less Than 12 school years
- Non Compliance with therapy
- Dual diagnosis
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Dynamic Cognitive Intervention Group
Twelve Meetings of Dynamic Cognitive Intervention.
|
Twelve meetings of a Dynamic Cognitive Intervention group.
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: No Additional Intervention
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Recovery Assessment Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline in Recovery Assessment Scale at 12th meeting (6 up to 12 weeks)
|
A baseline Recovery Assessment Scale will be used on the first intervention group meeting.
Recovery Assessment Scale will be used again on the last (i.e.
12th) intervention group meeting.
|
Change from baseline in Recovery Assessment Scale at 12th meeting (6 up to 12 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Hope Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline in Hope Scale at 12th meeting (6 up to 12 weeks)
|
A baseline Hope Scale will be used on the first intervention group meeting.
Hope Scale will be used again on the last (i.e.
12th) intervention group meeting.
|
Change from baseline in Hope Scale at 12th meeting (6 up to 12 weeks)
|
|
Change in Brief Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: Change from baseline in Brief Symptom Inventory at 12th meeting (6 up to 12 weeks)
|
A baseline Brief Symptom Inventory will be used on the first intervention group meeting.
Brief Symptom Inventory will be used again on the last (i.e.
12th) intervention group meeting.
|
Change from baseline in Brief Symptom Inventory at 12th meeting (6 up to 12 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Orly Tsabar, B.O.T., Tel Aviv University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0010-12-HYMC
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.