- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04925453
tDCS and Cognitive Training in Active Duty Service Members With Mild TBI: A Pilot Study
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Cognitive Training to Improve Concentration and Working Memory in Active Duty Service Members Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI): A Pilot Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Objectives: The proposed study will evaluate a new approach to cognitive rehabilitation of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) using a brain stimulation technique called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Specifically, we will investigate how tDCS combined with cognitive training improves deficits to attention and working memory in Active Duty Service Members with a history of mTBI. Measures of attention-related brain activity, neurocognitive assessments, and self-reported clinical outcomes will be used to determine effects of tDCS vs. sham tDCS when paired with a cognitive training intervention. By doing this study, we hope to find a reliable, noninvasive, and efficient method of treating mild TBI cognitive symptoms.
Research Plan and Methods: This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo (sham) controlled pilot study. We will recruit 60 Active Duty Service Members who are receiving outpatient services at Naval Medical Center San Diego, with a history of mTBI and reported neurocognitive symptoms related to attention, working memory, and related cognitive processes. Intake will involve a full pre-assessment of symptoms, neurocognitive performance, and an optional MRI scan. Participants will be randomized to either active or sham tDCS. Training/tDCS sessions will occur daily over five consecutive days. Random permuted blocks will be used to ensure exactly equal treatment numbers at certain equally spaced points in the sequence of patient assignment. Post-intervention assessment will include another assessment of symptoms, neurocognitive performance, and an optional MRI scan. Participants will complete assessments of symptoms and neurocognitive performance six-weeks following the post-intervention assessment.
Clinical Relevance to TBICoE/Navy Medicine: Aspects of this study will provide insight into a major research gap highlighted in the mission of the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, specifically in identifying/ developing innovative treatments/interventions which promote patient recovery and/or mitigate symptoms after mTBI. Novel, well-tolerated, neuroplasticity-based interventions that can improve attention, concentration, and working memory by targeting the underlying neural dysfunction are needed to improve outcomes and quality of life for Active Duty Service Members affected by neurocognitive weakness and dysfunction following mTBI. If tDCS proves successful in reducing TBI-related symptoms, improving cognition, or enhancing functional recovery, this non-invasive intervention could be implemented within various DoD and VA settings, enhancing recovery, improving quality of life, and bolstering occupational performance.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Lars D Hungerford, PhD
- Phone Number: 619.532.5715
- Email: lars.d.hungerford.ctr@mail.mil
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Angelica (Dilay) Aguirre, MPH
- Phone Number: 619-532-6132
- Email: angelica.d.aguirre2.ctr@mail.mil
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92134
- Recruiting
- Naval Medical Center San Diego
-
Contact:
- Lars D Hungerford, PhD
- Phone Number: 619-532-5715
- Email: lars.d.hungerford.ctr@mail.mil
-
Contact:
- Angelica Aguirre, MPH
- Phone Number: 619-532-6132
- Email: angelica.d.aguirre2.ctr@mail.mil
-
Principal Investigator:
- Lars D Hungerford, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- (1) Have a remote history mild traumatic brain injury as defined by the VA/DoD clinical practice guidelines(The Management of Concussion/mTBI Working Group, 2016) that is >/= 6 months, and report moderate severity neurocognitive symptoms related to attention, concentration, working memory, or memory based on NSI scores and self-report.
- (2) Are between the ages of 18-55.
- (3) Are stable on any medications for at least 2 weeks at the baseline visit (Visit #1).
Exclusion Criteria:
- (1) Have a history of seizures or epilepsy.
- (2) Have a history of ECT or cortical energy exposure within the past 12 months, including participation in any other neuromodulation studies.
- (3) Have current stimulant dependence.
- (4) Have a diagnosis of intellectual disability or pervasive developmental disorder (i.e. premorbid IQ less than or equal to 70).
- (5) Have any medical condition or treatment other than mild TBI (e.g. stroke, tumor, HIV, moderate-severe TBI), with significant neurological disorder or insults that, based on the Principal Investigator's judgement, would impact risk.
- (6) Diagnosed with current active psychosis or mania.
- (7) Have metallic cranial plates/screws or implanted device,
- (8) Have eczema on scalp or other scalp lesions or skin disorders that may become irritated by stimulation.
- (9) Pregnant individuals and individuals with ferromagnetic metal in their body that would prohibit them from being safe in the MRI will not be excluded from the overall study, but will be excluded from the optional MRI.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: TRIPLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Active tDCS
Based on previous studies targeting working memory, focality of current delivery, and comfort and tolerance levels, (Paulo S. Boggio et al., 2006; Hill et al., 2016; Hoy et al., 2013; Teo, Hoy, Daskalakis, & Fitzgerald, 2011), we will use a 2 mA current administered via two circular carbon rubber core electrodes in saline-soaked surface sponges (25 cm2), placed in a neoprene headcap with marked locations based on the 10-10 EEG system. The anodal stimulating electrode will be at location F3, over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the cathodal electrode at location F4, over right DLPFC. Two reference electrodes, CMS and DRL, will be attached to the EarClip and applied to the earlobe with conductive gel. Before each training session, the impedance of the electrodes will be checked and verified to be ≤15 KOhm. Additionally, the stimulation will be terminated if the impedance of the electrodes is > 20 KOhm. The current and impedance will be recorded for every session. |
Intervention sessions will occur during Visits 2-6.
Cognitive training will occur concurrently with tDCS in both the active and sham tDCS groups.
Over each 46-minute daily training period, 4 of 5 BrainHQ training tasks will be performed for approximately 11 minutes in a randomly selected order.
Order of task presentation will be randomized each session.
Stimulation sequences will occur in the first 13 minutes (shut off: Minute 13) of the session and the last 13 minutes of the session (turn on: Minute 33).
The Symptom Rating Questionnaire (SRQ) will be asked before and after stimulation to assess for any side-effects.
The BrainHQ Task Load Index (TLX) will be administered at the end of each intervention session.
At the end of Intervention Session 3, subjects will be given a Blinding Questionnaire which asks whether they thought they received active or sham treatment.
Other Names:
|
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Sham tDCS
For sham stimulation, the electrodes will be placed at the same positions as for active stimulation (F3 and F4). After an initial ramp-up period of 30 seconds, stimulation fades out over a period of 30 seconds. Additionally, at the end of the sham stimulation period, stimulation will fade in over a period of 30 seconds and then end with a final 30 second ramp-down period. Participants will feel the initial itching sensation associated with tDCS and experience the ramp-down period at the end of the sham stimulation period but will receive no active current during the rest of the sham stimulation period. This method of sham stimulation has been shown to be reliable (Gandiga et al., 2006). Before each training session, the impedance of the electrodes will be checked and verified to be ≤15 KOhm. Additionally, the stimulation will be terminated if the impedance of the electrodes is > 20 KOhm. The current and impedance will be recorded for every session. |
Intervention sessions will occur during Visits 2-6.
Cognitive training will occur concurrently with tDCS in both the active and sham tDCS groups.
Over each 46-minute daily training period, 4 of 5 BrainHQ training tasks will be performed for approximately 11 minutes in a randomly selected order.
Order of task presentation will be randomized each session.
Stimulation sequences will occur in the first and last 13 minutes of the session.
For sham stimulation, the electrodes will be placed at the same positions as for active stimulation, but current will be ramped down immediately after the initial 30s ramp up period.
The Symptom Rating Questionnaire (SRQ) will be asked before and after stimulation to assess for any side-effects.
The BrainHQ Task Load Index (TLX) will be administered at the end of each intervention session.
At the end of Intervention Session 3, subjects will be given a Blinding Questionnaire which asks whether they thought they received active or sham treatment.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline SDMT at 1 week after the intervention.
|
Standardized neuropsychological assessment measure of visual attention and working memory
|
Change from Baseline SDMT at 1 week after the intervention.
|
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline SDMT at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Standardized neuropsychological assessment measure of visual attention and working memory
|
Change from Baseline SDMT at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Time Frame: Change from 1 week post-intervention SDMT at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Standardized neuropsychological assessment measure of visual attention and working memory
|
Change from 1 week post-intervention SDMT at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB) Attention Module
Time Frame: Change from Baseline NAB Attention Module at 1 week after the intervention.
|
Standardized neuropsychological assessment consisting of 4 subtests to assess visual and auditory attention, working memory, and scanning.
|
Change from Baseline NAB Attention Module at 1 week after the intervention.
|
Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB) Attention Module
Time Frame: Change from Baseline NAB Attention Module at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Standardized neuropsychological assessment consisting of 4 subtests to assess visual and auditory attention, working memory, and scanning.
|
Change from Baseline NAB Attention Module at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB) Attention Module
Time Frame: Change from 1 week post-intervention NAB Attention Module at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Standardized neuropsychological assessment consisting of 4 subtests to assess visual and auditory attention, working memory, and scanning.
|
Change from 1 week post-intervention NAB Attention Module at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Electroencephalogram (EEG)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline EEG at 1 week after the intervention.
|
EEG will be collected to assess neural dynamics during rest and during performance of generalization tasks.
The neural dynamics to be assessed include functional connectivity, mean ERP amplitude, and spectral power of delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency bands.
|
Change from Baseline EEG at 1 week after the intervention.
|
Electroencephalogram (EEG)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline EEG at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
EEG will be collected to assess neural dynamics during rest and during performance of generalization tasks.
The neural dynamics to be assessed include functional connectivity, mean ERP amplitude, and spectral power of delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency bands.
|
Change from Baseline EEG at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Electroencephalogram (EEG)
Time Frame: Change from 1 week post-intervention EEG at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
EEG will be collected to assess neural dynamics during rest and during performance of generalization tasks.
The neural dynamics to be assessed include functional connectivity, mean ERP amplitude, and spectral power of delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency bands.
|
Change from 1 week post-intervention EEG at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline NSI at 1 week after the intervention.
|
A measure of common post-concussive symptoms rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4); with low scores corresponding to mild or no incidence of symptoms and high scores corresponding to more severe incidence of symptoms.
|
Change from Baseline NSI at 1 week after the intervention.
|
Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline NSI at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
A measure of common post-concussive symptoms rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4); with low scores corresponding to mild or no incidence of symptoms and high scores corresponding to more severe incidence of symptoms.
|
Change from Baseline NSI at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI)
Time Frame: Change from 1 week post-intervention NSI at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
A measure of common post-concussive symptoms rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4); with low scores corresponding to mild or no incidence of symptoms and high scores corresponding to more severe incidence of symptoms.
|
Change from 1 week post-intervention NSI at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) w/out contrast (optional)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline MRI at 1 week after the intervention.
|
Medical imaging technique that uses a magnetic field and computer-generated radio waves to create detailed images of the organs and tissues in your body.
Mean white matter and CSF signals across time are calculated for each participant.
Additionally, time courses for regions of interest are also extracted.
|
Change from Baseline MRI at 1 week after the intervention.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
NIH Toolbox Quality of Life Assessment (NeuroQoL)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline NeuroQoL at 1 week after the intervention.
|
Questionnaire to assess quality of life with regard to cognitive, social, emotional, and behavioral abilities rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1-5); with low scores corresponding to mild to no impairment in these abilities and high scores corresponding to more severe impairment in these abilities.
|
Change from Baseline NeuroQoL at 1 week after the intervention.
|
NIH Toolbox Quality of Life Assessment (NeuroQoL)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline NeuroQoL at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Questionnaire to assess quality of life with regard to cognitive, social, emotional, and behavioral abilities rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1-5); with low scores corresponding to mild to no impairment in these abilities and high scores corresponding to more severe impairment in these abilities.
|
Change from Baseline NeuroQoL at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
NIH Toolbox Quality of Life Assessment (NeuroQoL)
Time Frame: Change from 1 week post-intervention NeuroQoL at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Questionnaire to assess quality of life with regard to cognitive, social, emotional, and behavioral abilities rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1-5); with low scores corresponding to mild to no impairment in these abilities and high scores corresponding to more severe impairment in these abilities.
|
Change from 1 week post-intervention NeuroQoL at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline ISI at 1 week after the intervention.
|
Measure of insomnia severity rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4); with low scores corresponding to mild or no incidence of insomnia and high scores corresponding to more severe incidences of insomnia.
|
Change from Baseline ISI at 1 week after the intervention.
|
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline ISI at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Measure of insomnia severity rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4); with low scores corresponding to mild or no incidence of insomnia and high scores corresponding to more severe incidences of insomnia.
|
Change from Baseline ISI at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: Change from 1 week post-intervention ISI at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Measure of insomnia severity rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0-4); with low scores corresponding to mild or no incidence of insomnia and high scores corresponding to more severe incidences of insomnia.
|
Change from 1 week post-intervention ISI at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Fusion Task
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Fusion task at 1 week after the intervention.
|
Multi-modal assessment of brain function including EEG and eye tracking.
The EEG measures to be assessed include functional connectivity, mean ERP amplitude, and spectral power of delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency bands.
Other outcome measures to be assessed include saccadic response time latency, saccadic response time consistency, manual response time latency, manual response time consistency, and 1-back total score.
|
Change from Baseline Fusion task at 1 week after the intervention.
|
Fusion Task
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Fusion task at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Multi-modal assessment of brain function including EEG and eye tracking.
The EEG measures to be assessed include functional connectivity, mean ERP amplitude, and spectral power of delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency bands.
Other outcome measures to be assessed include saccadic response time latency, saccadic response time consistency, manual response time latency, manual response time consistency, and 1-back total score.
|
Change from Baseline Fusion task at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Fusion Task
Time Frame: Change from 1 week post-intervention Fusion task at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
Multi-modal assessment of brain function including EEG and eye tracking.
The EEG measures to be assessed include functional connectivity, mean ERP amplitude, and spectral power of delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency bands.
Other outcome measures to be assessed include saccadic response time latency, saccadic response time consistency, manual response time latency, manual response time consistency, and 1-back total score.
|
Change from 1 week post-intervention Fusion task at 6 weeks after the intervention.
|
tDCS Symptom Rating Questionnaire (SRQ)
Time Frame: Change from pre-intervention SRQ at post-intervention.
|
Questionnaire to assess pre-post tDCS symptom rating, rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3); with low scores corresponding to mild or no incidence of symptoms and high scores corresponding to severe incidence of symptoms.
|
Change from pre-intervention SRQ at post-intervention.
|
BrainHQ Task Load Index (TLX)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention.
|
Subjective workload assessment of level of effort, mental demand, frustration, and performance during cognitive training, rated on a 10-point Likert scale (1-10); with low scores corresponding to less effort or mental demand and high scores corresponding to more effort or mental demand.
|
Immediately after the intervention.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lars D Hungerford, PhD, United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Mental Disorders
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Neurocognitive Disorders
- Craniocerebral Trauma
- Trauma, Nervous System
- Cognition Disorders
- Head Injuries, Closed
- Wounds, Nonpenetrating
- Brain Injuries
- Wounds and Injuries
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic
- Cognitive Dysfunction
- Brain Concussion
Other Study ID Numbers
- NMCSD.2020.0016
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Brain Injuries
-
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child...CompletedTraumatic Brain Injuries
-
Technical University of MunichFederal Ministry of Defence (Germany); Bundesministerium der VerteidigungRecruitingTraumatic Brain InjuriesFrance, Germany
-
University of Colorado, DenverBinghamton University; Brooke Army Medical CenterRecruitingBrain ConcussionUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedTraumatic Brain InjuriesUnited States
-
Mosaic Life CareMissouri Western State UniversityTerminatedBrain Injuries | Brain Concussion | Athletic Injuries | Diffuse Axonal Injury | Injury, Brain, TraumaticUnited States
-
Bayside HealthVictorian Trauma FoundationCompletedTraumatic Brain Injury | Multiple Trauma | Spinal InjuriesAustralia
-
La Trobe UniversityRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Concussion, Brain | Musculoskeletal InjuryAustralia
-
More FoundationElMindA Ltd; Riddell, LLC; Mimic SystemsUnknownAthletic Injuries | Concussion, BrainUnited States
-
Association de Recherche Bibliographique pour les...University of Cambridge; Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace; Institut National...CompletedBrain Injuries | Sport Injury | Concussion, BrainMonaco
-
CentraCareElectroCore INCCompletedTraumatic Brain Injury | Acute Brain InjuriesUnited States
Clinical Trials on active tDCS and cognitive training intervention
-
University of Sao PauloFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloNot yet recruitingCOVID-19 | Cognitive Impairment | Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRecruitingElectroencephalography | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation | Autistic Spectrum Disorder | Booster EffectsHong Kong
-
University of MinnesotaRecruiting
-
Federal University of ParaíbaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteUnknownParkinson Disease | Motor Disorders | Cognition Disorder
-
IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio FatebenefratelliAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di BresciaActive, not recruitingPrimary Progressive AphasiaItaly
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityYbrain Inc.Enrolling by invitationDementia | Mild Cognitive Impairment | Primary Progressive AphasiaUnited States
-
University of MichiganCompletedSchizophrenia | Bipolar Disorder | Schizo Affective DisorderUnited States
-
University of FloridaNational Institute on Aging (NIA); University of ArizonaCompleted
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterAmerican Academy of NeurologyRecruitingDepression | Aging | Cognitive SymptomUnited States
-
Federal University of ParaíbaUnknownAutistic Disorders SpectrumBrazil