Human Amniotic Membrane Grafting and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers

March 14, 2016 updated by: MiMedx Group, Inc.

A Multi-center Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating Two Application Regimens of Human Amniotic Membrane Grafting and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the EpiFix human amniotic membrane is effective in the treatment of venous leg ulcers.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

98

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33433
        • Eric J. Lullove DPM
    • Massachusetts
      • Framingham, Massachusetts, United States
        • MetroWest Medical Center
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
        • St. Johns Wound Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Erie, Pennsylvania, United States, 16502
        • St. Vincent's Health Center
      • Kittanning, Pennsylvania, United States, 16201
        • Armstrong County Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years old
  • Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABI) > 0.75
  • Presence of a venous leg ulcer extending through the full thickness of the skin but not down to muscle, tendon or bone
  • Study ulcer has been present for at least one month prior to the initial screening visit, and is excluded if it has undergone 12 months of continuous high strength compression therapy over its duration
  • Study ulcer is a minimum of 2 cm2 and a maximum of 20 cm2 at the Randomization visit
  • The target ulcer has been treated with compression therapy for at least 14 days prior to randomization
  • Ulcer has a clean, granulating base with minimal adherent slough at the Randomization visit
  • Females of childbearing potential must be willing to use acceptable methods of contraception (birth control pills, barriers, or abstinence).
  • Patient understands and is willing to participate in the clinical study and can comply with weekly visits and the follow-up regimen
  • Patient has read and signed the IRB/IEC approved Informed Consent Form before screening procedures are undertaken

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Study ulcer(s) deemed by the investigator to be caused by a medical condition other than venous insufficiency
  • Study ulcer exhibits clinical signs and symptoms of infection.
  • Non-mobile i.e. not ambulatory, or bed ridden
  • Study ulcer, in the opinion of the investigator, is suspicious for cancer should undergo an ulcer biopsy to rule out a carcinoma of the ulcer
  • Patients with a history of more than two weeks treatment with immuno-suppressants (including systemic corticosteroids), cytotoxic chemotherapy, or application of topical steroids to the ulcer surface within one month prior to initial screening, or who receive such medications during the screening period, or who are anticipated to require such medications during the course of the study
  • Patients on any investigational drug(s) or therapeutic device(s) within 30 days preceding Screening
  • History of radiation at the ulcer site
  • Known history of having Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) or HIV.
  • Study ulcer has been previously treated with tissue engineered materials (e.g. Apligraf® or Dermagraft®) or other scaffold materials (e.g. Oasis, Matristem) within the last 30 days
  • Study ulcer requiring negative pressure wound therapy or hyperbaric oxygen during the course of the trial.
  • Patients who are unable to understand the aims and objectives of the trial
  • Presence of any condition(s) which seriously compromises the subject's ability to complete this study, or has a known history of poor adherence with medical treatment
  • NYHA Class III and IV congestive heart failure (CHF), as defined by the following criteria: Class III: Symptoms with moderate exertion; Class IV: Symptoms at rest
  • Ulcers on the dorsum of the foot or with more than 50% of the ulcer below the malleolus are excluded.
  • Pregnant or breast feeding
  • Currently taking medications which could affect graft incorporation.(supervising physicians discretion)
  • Allergic to gentamicin and streptomycin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: 1 application of EpiFix
1 x dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane
Dehydrated placental tissue
Compression bandaging
Other: 2 applications of EpiFix
2 x dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane
Dehydrated placental tissue
Compression bandaging
Other: Standard of care
Compression bandaging
Compression bandaging

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The proportion of wounds achieving 40% closure in patients treated with amniotic membrane vs. standard of care
Time Frame: 4 week
4 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The proportion of wounds achieving 40% closure in patients treated with one application of amniotic membrane vs. standard of care
Time Frame: 4 week
4 week
The proportion of wounds achieving 40% closure in patients treated with one application of amniotic membrane vs. 2 applications of amniotic membrane
Time Frame: 4 week
4 week
The proportion of wounds achieving 40% closure in patients treated with two applications of amniotic membrane vs. standard of care
Time Frame: 4 week
4 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas E Serena, MD, Penn North Centers for Advanced Wound Care

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 13, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 16, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Venous Leg Ulcer

Clinical Trials on EpiFix

Subscribe