Detection of Liver Fibrosis With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

January 24, 2020 updated by: Bachir Taouli

Prospective Detection of Liver Fibrosis With MRI Compared to Fibroscan and Blood Tests

Patients with chronic liver disease are at high risk of developing liver scarring (fibrosis), with ultimate risks of cirrhosis and liver cancer that may require liver transplant. The investigators would like to develop non invasive advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) techniques (MR diffusion, perfusion and elastography) to assess the degree of liver damage in patients with chronic liver disease. These techniques combined could reach high diagnostic performance for detection of liver fibrosis; and could decrease the number of liver biopsies, which have risks and sample only a small portion of the liver.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients with chronic hepatitis have increased risks of liver damage, including fibrosis and cirrhosis, which may eventually lead to hepatocellular carcinoma and end-stage liver disease requiring liver transplantation. These diseases are/will be the source of enormous health care costs and morbidity/mortality in the US.

Most hepatologists still rely on liver biopsy findings in patients newly diagnosed with chronic hepatitis, which enables the assessment of liver damage (fibrosis and inflammation). Liver biopsy has limitations, including cost, invasiveness, poor patient acceptance, limited sampling, inter-observer variability and is difficult to repeat.

Non invasive tests to capture the extent of liver damage at a larger scale are urgently needed. These will gain more acceptance among patients and hepatologists.

In this proposal, the investigators would like to test and validate non invasive MRI methods based on advanced MR diffusion, perfusion and elastography techniques for the detection of fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis. In order to improve the diagnostic performance of MRI, the investigators would like to build and validate a predictive model based on advanced functional MRI metrics (diffusion, perfusion and elastography). If validated, this novel non invasive algorithm will not only decreases the number of liver biopsies, but also enable earlier diagnosis of liver fibrosis when antiviral treatment is more effective, and enable a comprehensive evaluation of the liver (to assess for cirrhosis, portal hypertension and hepatocellular cancer).

This could significantly reduce the cost of care, could become a useful tool for testing new antifibrogenic and antiviral drugs in chronic viral hepatitis, and could be used to follow patients for detection of progression to cirrhosis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

276

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic liver disease (including viral hepatitis, alcoholic hepatitis, non alcoholic steatohepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, etc..)
  • 18 years of age and older
  • Liver biopsy (percutaneous or transjugular or surgical) performed within 6 months, as part of routine clinical care.
  • Liver transplant or liver resection performed within 6 months, as part of routine clinical care.
  • Patient is able to give informed consent for this study and agrees to provide a blood sample

Control group

  • Patients without history of liver disease and healthy volunteers
  • 18 years of age and older
  • Subject is able to give informed consent for this study and agrees to provide a blood sample

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18 years
  • Unable or unwilling to give informed consent
  • Contra-indications to MRI
  • Electrical implants such as cardiac pacemakers or perfusion pumps
  • Ferromagnetic implants such as aneurysm clips, surgical clips, prostheses, artificial hearts, valves with steel parts, metal fragments, shrapnel, tattoos near the eye, or steel implants
  • Ferromagnetic objects such as jewelry or metal clips in clothing
  • Pregnant subjects
  • Pre-existing medical conditions including a likelihood of developing seizures or claustrophobic reactions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Perfusion MRI
chronic liver disease who underwent/will undergo liver biopsy or will undergo liver transplant or liver resection as part of standard care during the previous 6 months.
1) Assess the role of a new FDA approved blood pool gadolinium contrast agent (gadofosveset trisodium, Ablavar, Lantheus) for the measurement of liver MR Perfusion, compared to extra-cellular contrast agents.
Other Names:
  • Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
  • Perfusion MRI (adofosveset trisodium, Ablavar, Lantheus)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PV Flow
Time Frame: Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)
Sub-Study I Portal Venous Flow - forward flow during systole and early diastole, and flow reversal after atrial contraction.The average PV area was extracted, and PV flow was computed as the multiplication of area and velocity.
Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)
PV Velocity
Time Frame: Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)
Sub-Study I Portal Venous Flow Velocity - The mean velocity of the region of interest (ROI) was extracted for each one of the 25 phase images, and the time average was computed.
Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)
LS-MRE for Sub-Study I
Time Frame: Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)
Sub-Study I Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images.
Fasting State Scan (an average of 15 min) and Postprandial State Scan (an average of 15 min)
True Diffusion Parameter (D)
Time Frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min) Scan

Sub-Study II True Diffusion Parameter - D- describes water diffusion in tissue independently from the effects of capillary perfusion; it is obtained from bi-exponential fitting of MRI diffusion signal acquired over a range of high and low diffusion-weighting factors (b-values)

Fibrosis State/Score:

F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min) Scan
LS-MRE Fibrosis State for Sub Study II
Time Frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Sub-Study II Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images.

Fibrosis State/Score:

F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
LS-TE
Time Frame: Fasting transient elastography, average duration 10 min

Sub-Study II Liver Stiffness with transient elastography (TE) (LS-TE) - a non-invasive modality of liver fibrosis detection: a shear wave is sent into the liver through a small transducer attached to an ultrasound probe, and the velocity of the wave is measured as it passes through the liver; shear wave velocity is then converted to stiffness, measured in kilopascals (kPa)

Fibrosis State/Score:

F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

Fasting transient elastography, average duration 10 min
MTT
Time Frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Sub-Study II Mean Transit Time (MTT) - Liver Mean Transit Time of Contrast Agent through the tissue of interest from Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI

Fibrosis State/Score:

F0-F2 - no signs of fibrosis to minimal fibrosis F3-F4 - fibrosis has spread and has connected to other areas on the liver that contain fibrosis or presence of cirrhosis

Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Liver Upslope From DCE-MRI
Time Frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Sub-Study III Liver Upslope of MRI signal is defined as peak concentration to the time to reach peak concentration of gadolinium contrast agent in the liver tissue of interest, derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI.

Portal hypertension (PH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Liver Time to Peak (TTP) for PH
Time Frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Sub-Study III Liver Time to Peak (TTP) is defined as the time in seconds to reach peak concentration of gadolinium contrast agent in the liver tissue of interest, derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) Portal hypertension (PH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥10 mmHg
Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
LS-MRE Portal Hypertension for Sub Study III
Time Frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Sub-Study III Liver stiffness (LS) measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in kilopascal (kPa). Liver stiffness is assessed by mathematical modeling of compression waves propagation in the liver, as measured from MRE images.

Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Spleen Volume
Time Frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg
Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Spleen Caudocranial Diameter
Time Frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg
Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
PH Imaging Score
Time Frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Sub-Study III Portal Hypertension imaging composite score (based on the presence of varices, spleen size, presence of ascites). The imaging score is based on the number of variceal sites (0: absence of varices, 1: one variceal site, 2: two variceal sites, and 3: 3 or more variceal sites), volume of ascites (0: no ascites, 1: minimal perihepatic and perisplenic fluid, 2: intraperitoneal fluid without marked abdominal wall distension, and 3: fluid causing marked abdominal wall distension), and maximum craniocaudal diameter of the spleen (0: size less than 13 cm, 1: size between 13 and 15 cm, 2: size between 15 and 20 cm, and 3: size greater than 20 cm). Score from 0 to 9, with higher score indicating worse disease.

Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
LSLU
Time Frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Sub-Study III Liver Stiffness to Liver Upslope ratio (LSLU) Portal Hypertension is defined as an HVPG ≥5 mmHg Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg
Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Liver DV
Time Frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Sub Study III Liver Distribution Volume (DV) is the distribution volume of contrast agent in the tissue of interest defined as a percentage ratio of gadolinium material volume to the volume of the liver tissue of interest, as derived from DCE-MRI; in the case of a contrast agent with extracellular distribution, DV measures the intravascular and extravascular-extracellular volume.

Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)
Spleen TTP
Time Frame: Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Sub Study III Spleen Time To Peak (TTP) - time to reach peak gadolinium concentration in spleen tissue of interest, derived from DCE-MRI.

Clinically Significant Portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg

Fasting State Multiparametric MRI Scan (an average of 60 min)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

May 16, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Liver Disease

Clinical Trials on Perfusion MRI

3
Subscribe