Respiratory Muscle Training in Institutionalized Elderly Population

March 23, 2014 updated by: Maria dels Angels Cebria i Iranzo, PT, PhD, University of Valencia

The Effectiveness of Pranayama Breathing Exercises vs. Threshold Inspiratory Muscle Trainer to Improve Respiratory Muscle Function in an Institutionalized Frail Elderly Population

The global loss of muscle mass and strength associated with aging is a cause of functional impairment and disability, particularly in the frail elderly. Respiratory function can be severely compromised if there is a decrease of respiratory (RM) strength complicated by the presence of comorbidities and physical immobility.

Previous studies have shown that the specific RM training is an effective method to increase RM strength, both in healthy people and patients. In this case, specific RM training may be regarded as a beneficial alternative to improve RM function, and thus prevent physical and clinical deterioration in this population.

The hypothesis is that specific RM training would improve RM strength and endurance in the experimental groups vs. control who do not participate in RM training.

Institutionalized elderly people with an inability to walk were randomly allocated to a control group, a Threshold group or a Pranayama group. Both experimental groups performed a supervised RM training, five days a week for six consecutive weeks. The maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP) and the maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) were assessed at four time points in each of three groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Studies have shown that general aerobic exercise training is accompanied by significant respiratory physiological benefits, including gains in RM strength and endurance (Larson, et al., 1999; Sheel, 2002; Watsford, et al., 2005; Lacasse et al., 2006). This benefit appears to be greater when general exercise conditioning is combined with specific RM training (Weiner, et al., 1992; Wanke, et al., 1994; Larson, et al., 1999; Hill y Eastwood, 2005; O'Brien, et al., 2008). However, many frail elderly are not able to perform general aerobic exercise, related or not to ADL, as it is mentioned above (e.g., institutionalized elderly with comorbidities, functional impairment and RM weakness). In this case, specific RM training may be used as a beneficial alternative to maintain or improve RM function (Watsford and Murphy, 2008), and thus prevent deterioration in this functionally impaired elderly.

The most commonly used techniques of specific RM training are: a) isocapnic hyperpnoea (Leith and Bradley, 1976; Belman and Mittman, 1980), b) respiratory resistive loading (Pardy, et al., 1981; Sonne and Davis, 1982; Belman, et al., 1986), and c) respiratory threshold loading (Clanton, et al., 1985; Chen, et al., 1985; Martyn, et al., 1987; Larson, et al., 1988). Apart from these three well-known techniques, other less studied types of exercise such as the controlled breathing exercises of Yoga, Pranayama, may also be added to this list (Kulpati, et al., 1982; Manocha, et al., 2002; Donesky-Cueco, et al., 2009).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Comunidad Valenciana
      • Moncada, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 46113
        • Residencia de la Tercera Edad "San Luis"
      • Quart de Poblet, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 46930
        • Residencia de la Tercera Edad "El Amparo"
      • Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 46003
        • Ballesol- Centros residenciales 3ª edad

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinically stable residents, institutionalized at least 1 year;
  • Barthel Index less than 95 points;
  • inability to independently walk more than 10 meters or inability to effectively use a wheelchair;
  • Mini-Mental Status Examination score of at least 20 points (i.e., subjects without moderate or severe cognitive deterioration).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • significant chronic cardiorespiratory diagnoses (e.g. moderate-severe COPD);
  • an acute cardiorespiratory episode during the last 2 months prior to the study;
  • neurological, muscular, or neuromuscular problems interfering with the capacity to engage in the tests and training protocols;
  • active smokers or former smokers who had stopped smoking less than 5 years ago;
  • a terminal disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Usual care
Experimental: Threshold Inspiratory Muscle Training
Inspiratory muscle training regime
Interval-based program consisting of seven cycles of 2-minutes work and 1-minute rest. The sessions took place 5 times per week over a six-week period for a total of 30 sessions. All participants were familiarized with the breathing exercises over a two-day familiarization period at the beginning of the protocol.
Other Names:
  • Threshold IMT
Experimental: Controlled breathing exercises
Yoga Pranayama breathing exercises
Interval-based program. The sessions took place 5 times per week over a six-week period for a total of 30 sessions. All participants were familiarized with the breathing exercises over a two-day familiarization period at the beginning of the protocol.
Other Names:
  • Pranayama

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) at 7 weeks
Time Frame: The groups were assessed at baseline (time zero) and at the end of the training protocol (week 7).
MIP is probably the most frequently reported noninvasive estimates of inspiratory muscle strength. Ever since Black and Hyatt (1969) reported this technique it has been widely used in patients, healthy control subjects across all ages, and athletes. Pressure is recorded at the mouth during a quasi-static short (few seconds) maximal inspiration. The manoeuvre is generally performed at Residual Volume (RV). Reference: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:531-535.
The groups were assessed at baseline (time zero) and at the end of the training protocol (week 7).
Change from baseline in Maximum Expiratory Pressure (MEP) at 7 weeks
Time Frame: The groups were assessed at baseline (time zero) and at the end of the training protocol (week 7).
MEP is probably the most frequently reported noninvasive estimates of expiratory muscle strength. Ever since Black and Hyatt (1969) reported this technique it has been widely used in patients, healthy control subjects across all ages, and athletes. Pressure is recorded at the mouth during a quasi-static short (few seconds) maximal expiration. The manoeuvre is generally performed at Total Lung Capacity (TLC). Reference: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:531-535.
The groups were assessed at baseline (time zero) and at the end of the training protocol (week 7).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Maximum Voluntary Ventilation at 7 weeks
Time Frame: The groups were assessed at baseline (time zero) and at the end of the training protocol (week 7).
This ventilatory test is a non-invasive technique and is a measure of both inspiratory and expiratory muscle endurance. The MVV is the largest volume that can be breathed in and out of the lungs during a 12 -15 second interval with maximal voluntary effort. Reference: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:562-564.
The groups were assessed at baseline (time zero) and at the end of the training protocol (week 7).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: José M Tomás, PhD, University of Valencia
  • Principal Investigator: M. Àngels Cebrià i Iranzo, PT, PhD, University of Valencia
  • Study Chair: David A Arnall, PT, PhD, East Tennessee State University
  • Study Chair: Celedonia Igual Camacho, PT, PhD, University of Valencia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 20, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 26, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Muscle Weakness

Clinical Trials on Threshold® Inspiratory Muscle Trainer (Respironics® Health Scan Inc. Cedar Grove, NJ, USA).

3
Subscribe