AMPED Outcomes Registry of Post-ED Pain Management (AMPED)

March 11, 2014 updated by: Radnor Registry Research, Inc

Acute Management of Pain From the Emergency Department: A National, Emergency Department-Based Prospective Post-Intervention Registry of Non-Opioid and Opioid Management of Acute Pain

Study aims to assess patient-recorded outcomes of pain control medications prescribed in the ER after visits for specific painful injuries/illnesses.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Multicenter, observational, prospective, out-of-hospital registry collecting clinical, satisfaction, quality of life, and healthcare resource utilization from subjects discharged after ED care for a specific acute pain syndrome with a clinician-determined analgesic regimen. Subjects are stratified by diagnosis and by regimen based on the treating clinician's judgment. The registry study is independent of ED care and clinician's decision-making.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

843

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
        • LSU Medical Center
    • Mississippi
      • Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39216
        • University of Mississippi Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • Cleveland Clinic
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74135
        • University of Oklahoma HSC
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Pennsylvania Hospital
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29403
        • Medical University of South Carolina
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Ben Taub General Hospital
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • University of Texas HSC at Houston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

at least 800 patients with specific musculoskeletal or visceral pain syndrome

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible subjects will meet the following criteria:

    1. Eligible diagnoses:

      musculoskeletal etiologies: acute extremity fractures sprains/strains acute gouty arthritis visceral etiologies: renal colic dysmenorrhea

    2. Age GTE 18 years;
    3. Decision to discharge from ED to community already made;
    4. Decision to give SPRIX, opioid, OR SPRIX + opioid rescue already made;
    5. Treating clinician deems patient appropriate for continued analgesic management as an outpatient for the next 3-5 days;
    6. Patient has ready touch-tone (mobile or land line) telephone access, provides number (and back-up number, if possible) and agrees (verbal or written consent as mandated by site) to answer and comply with brief IVR questionnaires daily for next 4 days.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible subjects will meet none of the following criteria:

    1. Patient admitted or placed on observation status from ED;
    2. Patient unwilling or unable to comply with telephonic follow-up;
    3. Fracture that requires surgical repair (even if at a later date);
    4. Patient has diagnosis of any chronic pain syndrome;
    5. Patient already routinely takes NSAID or opioid agent;
    6. Treating clinician has reasonable suspicion of drug-seeking behavior or noncompliance;
    7. Nasal abnormality or illness that could affect the absorption of intranasal medication (such as: nasal discharge, rhinitis, acute upper respiratory infection, acute epistaxis, nasal polyp, nasal tumor).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
NSAID only
Subjects have their pain treated post-ED care with NSAID medication alone
Opioid only
Subjects have their pain treated post-ED care with opioid medication alone
NSAID + Opioid
Subjects have their pain treated post-ED care with NSAID medication and opioid as PRN rescue analgesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Outcomes of pain control measures
Time Frame: 5 days
  1. Change in pain score over follow-up interval;
  2. Healthcare resource utilization during follow-up interval;
  3. Patient satisfaction with therapy;
  4. Return to work in employed cohort.
5 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction and Economic Outcomes
Time Frame: 5 days
  1. Effectiveness of work upon return;
  2. Relative adverse effect profiles of three treatment regimens;
  3. Compliance with therapy;
  4. QOL at conclusion of therapy.
5 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Charles V Pollack, MD, University of Pennsylvania
  • Study Director: Knox Todd, MD, MD Anderson
  • Study Director: Debra Diercks, MD, UC Davis
  • Study Director: Sharon Mace, MD, The Cleveland Clinic
  • Study Director: Stephen Thomas, MD, Univ Oklahoma

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 22, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 12, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Soft Tissue Injuries

3
Subscribe