- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01626612
De-escalation of Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy Study in Severe Sepsis
De-escalation of Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy Study in Severe Sepsis: A Randomized Clinical Trial (DEA Study)
Rational: Severe sepsis is one of the leading cause of mortality in intensive care unit patients. Early initiation of an appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy is associated with improved outcomes. In order to avoid an increase of selection pressure and the emergence of multidrug resistant pathogens, guidelines recommend to streamline the antimicrobial therapy after the identification of the pathogen responsible for infection. This strategy has been evaluated in several observational studies. However, at the bedside, few randomized clinical trials tested this strategy prospectively.
Method: the investigators conduct a randomized clinical trial comparing a strategy based on de-escalation (streamlining of the empirical antimicrobial therapy) and a conservative strategy (continuation of the empirical antimicrobial therapy). The investigators first aim was to show that a strategy based on de-escalation is not inferior to a conservative strategy in terms of intensive care unit length of stay. Secondary aims are to compare the rate of mortality rate, the emergence of multidrug resistant pathogens, and the feasibility of de-escalation. The study is performed in nine intensive care units from four institutions, and 120 patients are required to validate the investigators hypothesis. New technologies for the rapid diagnosis of severe infections are investigated in an ancillary study.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Marseille, France, 13354
- Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Major Subject;
- Subject having a sepsis engraves(burns) defined according to the following criteria during the initiation of the probability antibiotic treatment:
- Criteria of SIRS [ 14 ],
- And a suspected infection,
- And a failure of organ: low blood pressure, respiratory failure, coma, hepatic insufficiency, renal insufficiency, thrombopénia, spontaneous extension of the TCA,
- Subject for which an antibiotic treatment was begun within 6 hours following the diagnosis of sepsis engraves(burns);
- Subject for which a taking with microbiological aim was made within 48 hours following the diagnosis of sepsis
Exclusion Criteria:
- Minor Subject, pregnant or breast-feeding woman;
- Neutropénia (PN < 1000 / mm3);
- Absence of identification of a microorganism in the microbiological examinations;
- Absence of Social Security;
- Subject deprived of freedom or under guardianship;
- Subject for which the lit(enlightened) consent is not collected(taken in) (itself and/or reliable person).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: a strategy based on de-escalation
|
ALL THE ANTIBACTERIAL IN WORN SYSTEMATIC
|
|
Active Comparator: a conservative strategy
|
ALL THE ANTIBACTERIAL IN WORN SYSTEMATIC
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
the length of stay
Time Frame: 24 months
|
he deadline in days sold enters the diagnosis of sepsis engrave or toxic shock and the exit of resuscitation.
|
24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mortality in resuscitation
Time Frame: 24 months
|
The arisen of the death during the initial phase of stay in resuscitation
|
24 months
|
|
Lasted treatment antibiotic
Time Frame: 24 MONTHS
|
Deadline in days between the beginning of the initiation of the treatment(processing) antibiotic and the 1st day when the subject is not any more handled by antibiotic
|
24 MONTHS
|
|
Lasted mechanical ventilation(breakdown)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Deadline in days sold between the implementation and the stop(ruling) of the mechanical ventilation(breakdown)
|
24 months
|
|
Lasted administration of catécholamines
Time Frame: 24 months
|
The number of days without catécholamines during the stay in resuscitation
|
24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: BERNARD BELAIGUES, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2011-002297-22
- 2011 -10 (Other Identifier: AP HM)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Severe Sepsis
-
Indonesia UniversityCompletedSevere Sepsis With Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockIndonesia
-
Beckman Coulter, Inc.Biomedical Advanced Research and Development AuthorityEnrolling by invitationSevere Sepsis | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockUnited States
-
Rennes University HospitalUnknownSevere Sepsis or Septic Shock
-
Beckman Coulter, Inc.CompletedSepsis | Severe Sepsis | Severe InfectionFrance, Spain
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedSevere Sepsis or Septic ShockKorea, Republic of
-
University of RostockCompletedSevere Sepsis and Septic ShockGermany
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceUnknownComparison of Sensitivity Between Presepsine and Lactate for the Diagnosis of Severe Sepsis. (PREDI)Severe Sepsis and Septic ShockFrance
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceUnknownSevere Sepsis and Septic ShockFrance
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalUnknownLactate | Severe Sepsis With Septic Shock
-
University of UtahNational Institutes of Health (NIH)CompletedSevere Sepsis With Septic Shock
Clinical Trials on streamlining of the empirical antimicrobial therapy
-
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la...Completed
-
Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive MedizinEdwards LifesciencesCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensCompleted
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingHELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTIONS | Rescue Therapy for Helicobacter Pylori
-
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University...RecruitingUrolithiasis | AntibioticsChina
-
Universita di VeronaCompletedPhotodynamic Therapy | Third Molar Extraction | Antimicrobial Photodynamic TherapyItaly
-
Erasme University HospitalUniversity of Liege; Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel; University Hospital, Lille and other collaboratorsCompletedBacteriuria | Urinary Tract Infections | Kidney Transplantation | Asymptomatic BacteriuriaBelgium, France
-
Indian Council of Medical ResearchKing George's Medical University; Lady Hardinge Medical College; King Edward... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingSepsis | Preterm Birth | Preterm Premature Rupture of Membrane | PROM, Preterm (Pregnancy) | Early-Onset Neonatal SepsisIndia
-
D'Or Institute for Research and EducationNot yet recruiting
-
University of ManitobaUnknown