Furosemide Versus Ethacrynic Acid in Children With Congenital Heart Disease

July 23, 2014 updated by: Zaccaria Ricci, Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research Institute

Phase III Study of Furosemide Continuous Infusion Versus Ethacrynic Acid Continuous Infusion in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: Randomized Double Blind Controlled Clinical Trial

This study aims to verify if ethacrynic acid continuous infusion is superior to furosemide continuous infusion in total urine output production during the first 24 post operative hours.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Diuretic therapy in children after open heart surgery is widely administered, though no evidence currently supports if an ideal drug or an ideal dosage can be recommended. Loop diuretics are the most effective drugs in terms of urine output production but may cause some collateral effects such as metabolic alkalosis, hypovolemia, hypokalemia, ototoxicity. Furthermore, some reports showed that loop diuretics usage can be associated with an increased risk of renal dysfunction and mortality. However, their use in children with signs of fluid overload, pulmonary edema or oliguria is mandatory and widely practiced.

Furosemide and ethacrynic acid are often prescribed and administered without any specific indication, basing on clinicians preferences.

No study so far, explored the hypothesis of which of these drugs is the most effective in terms of urine output production and safe in terms of renal function.

This study aims to verify if ethacrynic acid continuous infusion is superior to furosemide continuous infusion in total urine output production during the first 24 post operative hours.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rome, Italy, 00165
        • Bambino Gesu Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 8 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery
  • intraoperative aortic cross clamp over 90 minutes or interventional catheterization procedures with post-operative inotrope score over 20
  • sign of fluid retention after surgical procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preoperative renal dysfunction
  • Preoperative administration of more than 4mg/kg/die loop diuretics
  • Need for renal replacement therapy at ICU admission
  • Need for ECMO at ICU admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: furosemide
furosemide, 0.2 mg/kg/h up to 0.8 mg/kg/h for 72 hours
furosemide, intravenous, continuous infusion, 0.2 mg/kg/h for 24 hours
Other Names:
  • lasix
Active Comparator: ethacryinic acid
ethacrynic acid, 0.2 mg/kg/h up to 0.8 mg/kg/h for 72 hours
ethacrynic acid, intravenous, continuous infusion, 0.2 mg/kg/h for 24 hours
Other Names:
  • reomax

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean total urine output production in the first post-operative day
Time Frame: first 24 hours after Intensive Care Unit admission
Verification of the superiority of ethacrynic acid compared with furosemide in improving patients' total urine output by at least 1 ml/kg/h in the first 24 post-operative hours
first 24 hours after Intensive Care Unit admission

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean creatinine and NGAL values
Time Frame: first 72 hours after Intensive Care Unit admission
Verification of the superiority of ethacrynic acid compared with furosemide in improving patients' renal function (asessed as creatinine, NGAL and pRIFLE score) in the first 72 post-operative hours
first 72 hours after Intensive Care Unit admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zaccaria Ricci, MD, Bambino Gesù Hospital RI

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 27, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 24, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fluid Overload

Clinical Trials on furosemide

3
Subscribe