Image-Guided, Intensity-Modulated Photon or Proton Beam Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage II-IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

March 5, 2026 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Phase I/II Trial of Image-Guided, Intensity-Modulated Photon (IMRT) or Scanning Beam Proton Therapy (IMPT) Both With Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Dose Escalation to the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) With Concurrent Chemotherapy for Stage II/III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

This partially randomized phase I/II trial studies the side effects and best dose of image-guided, intensity-modulated photon or proton beam radiation therapy and to see how well they work in treating patients with stage II-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer. This trial is testing a new way of delivering radiation dose when only the tumor receives dose escalation while the surrounding normal structure is kept at standard level. Photon beam radiation therapy is a type of radiation therapy that uses x-rays or gamma rays that come from a special machine called a linear accelerator (linac). The radiation dose is delivered at the surface of the body and goes into the tumor and through the body. Proton beam radiation therapy is a type of radiation therapy that uses streams of protons (tiny particles with a positive charge) to kill tumor cells. Both methods are designed to give a higher than standard dose of treatment to the tumor and may reduce the amount of radiation damage to healthy tissue near a tumor.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of image-guided intensity-modulated photon (IMRT) and proton therapy (IMPT) both with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) dose escalation to the SIBVi (internal SIB volume; defined as the gross tumor volume with consideration of respiratory motion plus setup uncertainty margin) for patients with stage II/IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving concurrent standard chemotherapy and proton irradiation. (Phase I) II. Assess and compare survival free of grade III treatment related toxicity and local progression-free survival from day 1 of concurrent chemoradiation for stage II-IIIB NSCLC patients treated with image-guided robustly-optimized IMPT versus (vs.) IMRT, both delivered with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). (Phase II)

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Determine treatment-related acute and late toxicity. II. Correlate changes in standardized uptake values (SUV) on positron emission tomography (PET) and study endpoints (toxicity, tumor response, local control).

III. Correlate changes in peripheral blood biomarkers (genes, micro-ribonucleic acid [RNA], proteins) and the study endpoints.

IV. Estimate progression-free and overall survival. V. Document and compare symptom burden before starting chemoradiation, weekly during treatment, bi-weekly from end of treatment until first follow up, and at each follow-up visit thereafter by using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory - Plus (MDASI-Plus) and European Quality of Life Instrument-5 dimensions (EQ-5D).

VI. Perform cost effectiveness between IMPT and IMRT both with SIB treatment. VII. Correlate imaged response, clinical response, blood biomarkers and symptom burdens to dose distribution patterns.

OUTLINE: This is a phase I, dose-escalation study followed by a randomized phase II study.

PHASE I: Patients undergo image-guided IMRT with SIB or IMPT with SIB once daily (QD) 5 days a week for up to 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

PHASE II: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

ARM I: Patients undergo image-guided IMRT SIB QD 5 days a week for up to 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

ARM II: Patients undergo image-guided IMPT SIB QD 5 days a week for up to 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 4-8 weeks, every 3-4 months for 3 years, every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually thereafter.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

146

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pathologically proven diagnosis of unresected stage II-IIIB, or recurrent after surgical resection or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) non-small cell lung cancer
  • Suitability for concurrent chemoradiation therapy per treating physician's assessment
  • Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score >= 70
  • Weight loss < 15% in the 3 months before diagnosis
  • Prior receipt of induction chemotherapy followed by referral for concurrent chemoradiation is allowed
  • Adequate lung function indicated by forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1) >= 1 L is required
  • The primary tumor and/or regional lymph nodes must be evaluable radiographically
  • The gross target volume (GTV) is suitable for motion management using 4 dimensional computed tomography (4D CT), internal target volume (ITV), or respiratory gating; in addition, the target coverage and normal tissue constraints must be met as specified in protocol accounting for the respiratory motion of anatomy as a whole (not just the tumor)
  • No prior radiation to the mediastinal structures
  • Hemoglobin >= 9.0 g/dL
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >= 1,500/mm^3
  • Platelet count >= 100,000/mm^3
  • Total bilirubin =< 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Alanine and aspartate transaminases (ALT and AST) =< 2.5 times the ULN (=< 5 x ULN for patients with liver involvement)
  • Creatinine =< 1.5 times ULN
  • Patients must sign an informed consent indicating that they are aware of the investigational nature of the study in keeping with the policy of MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior radiotherapy to any anatomic regions that would result in overlap of radiation dose distribution to critical structures (esophagus, heart, spinal cord, brachial plexus)
  • T4 tumor with direct invasion of esophagus, spinal cord, major blood vessel, or heart
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients of childbearing potential must practice appropriate contraception
  • Patient refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (image-guided IMRT)
Patients undergo image-guided IMRT SIB QD 5 days a week for up to 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Ancillary studies
Optional correlative studies
Undergo image-guided IMRT
Other Names:
  • IGRT
  • image-guided radiation therapy
Undergo image-guided IMPT
Other Names:
  • IGRT
  • image-guided radiation therapy
Undergo image-guided IMRT
Other Names:
  • IMRT
  • Intensity Modulated RT
  • Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Undergo image-guided IMPT
Other Names:
  • IMRT
  • Intensity Modulated RT
  • Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Undergo image-guided IMRT
Experimental: Arm II (image-guided IMPT)
Patients undergo image-guided IMPT SIB QD 5 days a week for up to 6 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Ancillary studies
Optional correlative studies
Undergo image-guided IMRT
Other Names:
  • IGRT
  • image-guided radiation therapy
Undergo image-guided IMPT
Other Names:
  • IGRT
  • image-guided radiation therapy
Undergo image-guided IMRT
Other Names:
  • IMRT
  • Intensity Modulated RT
  • Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Undergo image-guided IMPT
Other Names:
  • IMRT
  • Intensity Modulated RT
  • Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Undergo image-guided IMPT
Other Names:
  • Proton Radiation Therapy
  • PBRT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) (Phase I)
Time Frame: 90 days
Will be defined as the highest simultaneous integrated boost volume (SIBV) dose that has posterior probability of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) =< 30%. DLT are defined as Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0 grade 3+ acute radiation toxicity, including esophagitis, pneumonitis, and skin reaction that are definitely, or probably related to radiation treatment. Toxicities will be tabulated by dose, severity, and relationship to radiation therapy.
90 days
MTD for intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) (Phase I)
Time Frame: 90 days
Will be defined as the highest SIBV dose that has posterior probability of DLT =< 30%. DLT are defined as CTCAE 4.0 grade 3+ acute radiation toxicity, including esophagitis, pneumonitis, and skin reaction that are definitely, or probably related to radiation treatment. Toxicities will be tabulated by dose, severity, and relationship to radiation therapy.
90 days
Survival free of grade >= 3 toxicity (with a target of at least 75%) (Phase II)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Local progression-free survival (75% at 6 months) d (Phase II)
Time Frame: 6 months
Will be defined as tumor recurrence or progression inside or at the boundary of the volume defined by the 60 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) isodose line. A Bayesian method will be applied.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to local failure (Phase II)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
The product-limit estimator of Kaplan and Meier will be used.
Up to 5 years
Progression-free survival (Phase II)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
The product-limit estimator of Kaplan and Meier will be used.
Up to 5 years
Overall survival (Phase II)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
The product-limit estimator of Kaplan and Meier will be used.
Up to 5 years
Posterior probability that the DLT rate 90 days from day 1 of radiation therapy is more than 30% (Phase II)
Time Frame: 90 days
A 90% credible interval will be reported for this rate. Toxicities will be tabulated by severity and relationship to radiation therapy.
90 days
Changes in selected biomarkers (Phase II)
Time Frame: Baseline to up to 5 years
Correlate changes in peripheral blood biomarkers (genes, ctDNA, microRNA, exosomes, proteins) and the study endpoints. Cox proportional hazards regression will be used to estimate the relationship between changes in selected biomarkers and time to local failure, progression-free survival, and overall survival.
Baseline to up to 5 years
Change in symptom burden using European Quality of Life Five Dimension [EQ-5D]) (Phase II) Survey
Time Frame: Up to 10 minutes
Descriptive statistics and box plots will be used and will be measured by participants answers to the survey.
Up to 10 minutes
Change in symptom burden using MD Anderson Symptom Inventory [MDASI]-Plus Survey
Time Frame: Up to 10 minutes
Descriptive statistics and box plots will be used and will be measured by participants answers to the survey.
Up to 10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zhongxing Liao, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 17, 2012

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

June 27, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recurrent Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire Administration

Subscribe